Hey guys. I remember seeing this a while back, but for the life of me I
can't find it now. It's an experimental browser that supports
everything currently included in the XHTML 2.0 spec. Does anyone know
what it's called?
-Noa
Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
Self explanatory, see subject.
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
EditPlus http://editplus.com/ isn't free, as such, but it has an
unlimited unrestricted trial mode, and better syntax highlighting.
Also, it has a built in FTP
Does 'CSS-Discuss' consider validation a theoretical issue?
Justin French wrote:
On 23/05/2004, at 10:23 PM, Michael J. Hußmann wrote:
Personally, I have no particular
interest in discussing theoretical issues regarding web standards; if
someone can steer me to a list better suited to dealing with
The W3C validator does recognise application/xhtml+xml. The problem
might be that you're not checking for the W3C's user agent string when
you decide which browsers to send which MIME type to. The string is
W3C_Validator.
Mordechai Peller wrote:
According to the W3C, my valid XHTML 1.1 page
YoYoEtc wrote:
Just wanted to make a comment - criticism perhaps - of the size of the
print/text I see on some web sites I have visited. Honestly, I am not
old and I almost need a magnifying glass to see some of it. Sometimes
it seems that the designer has tried to cram as much as is humanly
Document Type Definition. It defines what all the tags mean.
YoYoEtc wrote:
What is DTD?
At 09:03 PM 5/5/2004, Chris Bentley wrote:
On 05/05/2004, at 10:09 PM, Patrick Griffiths wrote:
I thought XHTML transitional _is_ XML. In what way is XHTML
transitional is a less strict data format?
It's a
Gabriel Vasquez wrote:
Hi List!
Ever since I've been using the standards approach to web design, I've never
used spans at all. What's the point of using them?
Thanks for your input!
Gabriel
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Cb2 Web Design wrote:
Hello list,
I have been dealing with some ways of having box borders other than the
regular ones... Can you please tell me if this attempt is semantically
correct and if it has too much nested divs?
Example: http://cb2web.com/tests/testboxmodel.htm
CSS:
Nelson Ford wrote:
The reason I brought this up was not because I had been seeing a lot
of that talk on this list, but more on some forums on the internet
where a standards beginner asks a question and someone pipes up: Just
change the DTD and we can all validate! [insert south park smile
*
That's a great trick, too.. simplicity all the way.
-Noa
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
://eastsdomain.com/test/ .
Thanks!
-Noa
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting help
*
for
agent-switching, etc.
That said, if you want to use css.. you could just seperate the header
from the table, give it a seperate class and set the width accordingly.
B
Noa Groveman wrote:
Hey everyone, I've been reading this list for a couple weeks and this
is my first time posting. I've got
it. In that case, I would emneed/em
to use CSS tables.
Here's a static version of the table (with the colspan header):
http://eastsdomain.com/test/table1.htm
And a static version of the CSS tables:
http://eastsdomain.com/test/table2.htm
(notice the difference in file size as well)
-Noa
Justin French
13 matches
Mail list logo
