[WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread kvnmcwebn
hello all, let me discribe the effect that im trying to achieve with css using a table as a metaphor. table width='760' height=100% tr height=120px td../td/tr tr height=auto td../td/tr tr heigth=120pxtd../td/tr /table Im trying this with 4 divs-a header, body and footer and a wrapper. My

Re: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread Vincent Johansen
1. You got a problem with IE5.2 for Mac too, your footer won't display. 2. It seems to me that you got alot of unescesary classes and id's in your stylesheet, in addition you've both got an inline stylesheet and external one, some ID's and classes are defined two times. It would be a good idea

RE: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread kvnmcwebn
I guess i put the page together hastily just trying to figure out the height challenge. -didnt validate it. Thanks for your help especially with the ampersand delimeter thing - that was showing up on previous versions when i ran it through the validator. I've nearly given up on solving the 100%

Re: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread Total {'-_-'} Ninj@
please remove my mail for the list !!! - Original Message - From: kvnmcwebn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 2:15 PM Subject: RE: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout. I guess i put the page together hastily just trying to figure out

Re: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
kvnmcwebn wrote: Right now I'm trying another fixed height version but its a big comprimize in the look im going for. Hope to get some good advice here. I wonder how a 'fixed height' should fit different windows/screens, but I guess 'fixed to window' is what you mean. You may pick up some

RE: [WSG] 3 column vetical layout.

2005-10-15 Thread kvnmcwebn
thanks georg that brilliant. i slightly modified some source from the frames with no frames site because it used more block elements than yours. you can check out the basic template that i created if you like http://www.mcmonagle.biz/final9.htm I should have asked sooner. -best kvnmcwebn