Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-13 Thread Tonico Strasser
Neerav schrieb: Theoretical example 1: we used to design for 5.x browsers but recently stopped doing so without charging clients an extra XX% That is what we do now. I add an import filter (and document it) so that IE 4.0-5.0/Win and IE4.0-5.x/Mac and NN 4.x ignore imported styles:

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-13 Thread Jan Brasna
@import'styles.css'; http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/import_single_quotes_no_space.html Agree, I'm lately converting to doing it the same way (as you never know when the brokem wannabe-css-rendering makes the site unusable, so rather serve plain document to them). -- Jan Brasna

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Kornel Lesinski
I develop sites primarily for Opera and Firefox and then downgrade for IE6. I occasionally check in Safari. Opera/Gecko/Safari get fully-featured website. IE6 almost (except some :hover/:focus, etc) and generally I don't care about anything else. If client pays extra I add stylesheet+scripting

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Kris Khaira
I design on the mac so I first test on Safari and then Camino. Then I go to my PC or VNC it and test on IE6.0 and Firefox. Firefox and Camino have slight differences e.g. form behaviour and font-size in form inputs so it's important to test in both. And then I test on Opera on the mac.

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Martin Heiden
Neerav, we develop for Firefox and test while developing from time to time in Opera (7). If everything is done, we check in IE6 and Safari and tweak the code (using conditional comments for IE). After that we check in IE5 (Win), but just if anything breaks the layout completly. IE5

RE: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Nick Elliott
on PC and Safari and IE5 on Mac. Cheers Nick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Neerav Sent: 12 May 2005 03:03 To: WSG Subject: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for? Hi I havent asked this for a while so it would be interesting to know what

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Lisa Hoppes
Our current list is: Windows 2000/XP Mac OS 10 + Browsers: IE 6.0 + Netscape 7 + Firefox 1 + Mozilla 1.7 + Safari We are a company, with most of our users are IE6 on Windows. They're in industries where the flashiest newest is not a proirity. We until recently fully supported IE 5/5.5 but no

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Neerav wrote: I havent asked this for a while so it would be interesting to know what the current trend in Browser/Operating system support is for the freelancers/corporates on this list to see if there has been any change in the last 6-12 months I think of people stuck with old browsers, the

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Kornel Lesinski
On Thu, 12 May 2005 15:56:10 +0100, Thierry Koblentz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think of people stuck with old browsers, the same way I think of people using keyboard navigation, etc. I believe browser support is accessibility, so I spend time tweaking my sheets, *trying* to make my sites look

Re: [WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-12 Thread Thierry Koblentz
Kornel Lesinski wrote: Pretty does not mean accessible. OK, I should have said look good and functional ;-) For example, when DIVs overlap, links become unclickable, content disappear. etc. I think it's better to spend time on some WAI checkpoints rather than adding display tweaks for NN4 and

[WSG] Minimum browsers/OS tested for?

2005-05-11 Thread Neerav
Hi I havent asked this for a while so it would be interesting to know what the current trend in Browser/Operating system support is for the freelancers/corporates on this list to see if there has been any change in the last 6-12 months Theoretical example 1: we used to design for 5.x browsers