Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but since everyone I know
has moved to Tiger, I don't assume this is a problem...
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: www.alphanumeric.cz | www.janbrasna.com
Hi
I'm not sure, but given Safari and Konquerer run off the same base
(khtml) you could try searching the bugz database at opendarwin.org
and kde.org
http://bugzilla.opendarwin.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specificorder=relevance+descbug_status=__all__product=WebKitcontent=
On 18 Aug 2005, at 9:35 pm, Jan Brasna wrote:
Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but since everyone I
know has moved to Tiger, I don't assume this is a problem...
Safari 1.3 and 2.0 are supposed to be identical.
, August 18, 2005 5:56 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2 differences
On 18 Aug 2005, at 9:35 pm, Jan Brasna wrote:
Gamma correction, min-/mix-width/height, this is the most visible
difference between 1.2.4 (maybe 1.3) and 2.0, but since everyone I
know
On 19/8/05 8:22 AM, chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quoteSafari 1.3 and 2.0 are supposed to be identical/quote
I was recently working on a site that errors out completely in
Safari/Tiger but works great in Safari/Panther.
The error in Tiger is too many http requests when downloading
Oh no. Not another browser difference to account for. When does it
ever end? :)
(Please excuse me if this has been discussed before and I missed it.)
Has anyone else been noticing differences on sites rendering
differently in Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2? I sure have in the 2 latest
sites I've
From: Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh no. Not another browser difference to account for. When does it
ever end? :)
(Please excuse me if this has been discussed before and I missed
it.)
Has anyone else been noticing differences on sites rendering
differently in Safari 1.3 vs Safari 2? I
