Re: [WSG] Site test?

2011-05-22 Thread David Laakso
On 5/21/11 5:22 PM, Telford Computer Doctor wrote: Just in the process of designing a website for a client, just wondering whether iPad, iPhone, mobile users could give me some feedback as to the jQuery used - whether it works basically. http://www.telfordcomputerdoctor.co.uk/lt Only the

RE: [WSG] Site test?

2011-05-22 Thread Birendra
AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site test? The transition is smooth and the paging buttons just big enough to hit with my finger on my iPad. Agree regarding the blue on blue nav. Clearly you have not finished so I'll leave it there. -- @ollicle On 22/05/2011, at 7:03 AM

[WSG] Site test?

2011-05-21 Thread Telford Computer Doctor
Good morning/afternoon/evening all, First post here, so go easy ;-) Just in the process of designing a website for a client, just wondering whether iPad, iPhone, mobile users could give me some feedback as to the jQuery used - whether it works basically.

Re: [WSG] Site test?

2011-05-21 Thread Andrew Maben
Looks good on my Touch, except the blue on blue nav is a bit hard to read. The transtions look great! Andrew Sent from my iPod On May 21, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Telford Computer Doctor i...@telfordpc.co.uk wrote: Good morning/afternoon/evening all, First post here, so go easy ;-) Just in

Re: [WSG] Site test?

2011-05-21 Thread Oliver Boermans
The transition is smooth and the paging buttons just big enough to hit with my finger on my iPad. Agree regarding the blue on blue nav. Clearly you have not finished so I'll leave it there. -- @ollicle On 22/05/2011, at 7:03 AM, Andrew Maben and...@andrewmaben.com wrote: Looks good on my

Re: [WSG] Site test?

2011-05-21 Thread Stuart Shearing
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 5:33 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Site test? Looks good on my Touch, except the blue on blue nav is a bit hard to read. The transtions look great! Andrew Sent from my iPod On May 21, 2011, at 5:22 PM, Telford Computer Doctor i

Re: [WSG] Site test Google analytics

2007-07-26 Thread Tee G. Peng
On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:24 PM, Jason Robb wrote: Hello everyone, I launched a site today. http://www.barbarawellsstudio.com - I'm looking for some criticism, any suggestions are appreciated. On a side note, I posted a thread back in late May on Photo Gallery markup. My solution is located

Re: [WSG] Site test Google analytics

2007-07-26 Thread James Ellis
(strict transitional etc) so you can have your standards cake and eat it too. Cheers James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Robb Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:25 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Site test Google

RE: [WSG] Site test Google analytics

2007-07-26 Thread Joyce Evans
, July 26, 2007 4:25 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Site test Google analytics Hello everyone, I launched a site today. http://www.barbarawellsstudio.com - I'm looking for some criticism, any suggestions are appreciated. On a side note, I posted a thread back in late May on Photo

[WSG] Site test Google analytics

2007-07-26 Thread Jason Robb
Hello everyone, I launched a site today. http://www.barbarawellsstudio.com - I'm looking for some criticism, any suggestions are appreciated. On a side note, I posted a thread back in late May on Photo Gallery markup. My solution is located here: http://www.barbarawellsstudio.com/collections/

Re: [WSG] Site test Google analytics

2007-07-26 Thread Matthew Cruickshank
Jason Robb wrote: My question is this: If I insert the script anywhere but the head, does this break any rules or standards? Shouldn't all scripts be located in the head ONLY? Perhaps I am way off on this. HTML 4.01 states, The SCRIPT element places a script within a document. This element