In what way do you think that SPANs are better than DIVs? My
understanding was that they were both entirely neutral, and at exactly
the same level as each other, simply that one is a block by default,
while the other is inline.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 3/5/2007 08:44 PM, Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
http://geofeat.com/
Nice site, Sarah.
If you look at the home page with images turned off you'll see that
there's no site title -- the graphic logo disappears and you've
positioned the text head (Geofeat - all things green, eco-friendly
and
I think it looks great! Just a couple of things I noticed:
1. Your ordered lists could do with the text being indented rather than
wrapping under the number.
2. Your directory top 10 links don't change bg-color when they receive
:focus
3. Your main nav links don't change on :focus like they
I like the clean layout but to be honest when I read your description I was
thinking I wuld see more green seeing its a 'greeny' website
nothing like green for the corporate ID
On 3/6/07, Sarah Peeke (XERT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We have recently unveiled a new project on all
Fantastic work, Sarah.
My only comment is that I'd put your rounded corners in spans instead of
divs. Seems like it'd be more semantic. Being they're just holding images
and not really divisions.
Respectfully,
Mike Cherim
http://green-beast.com/
- Original Message -
From: Sarah
Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote:
We have recently unveiled a new project on all things green,
eco-friendly and organic:
http://geofeat.com/
I would really appreciate feedback on issues related to standards,
usability and accessibility.
Sarah :)
Quick look in XP, Sarah.
Doing well in
