Does this site use some kind of image replacement/substitution technique
for the headers?
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help:
PROTECTED] De la part de kevin mcmonagle
Envoyé : mercredi 28 mars 2007 14:04
À : wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Objet : Re: [WSG] New Yorker Redesign
Does this site use some kind of image replacement/substitution technique
for the headers
misc:exposeBean var=platform bean=platform/
Never a good look to expose your beans in public...
Apart from that it seems to be just url encoding issues - great to see more and
more large sites moving to standards based code
Paul
Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming the new 800x600, but it's
something that is probably ahead of its time. Especially since two members
of my immediate family intentionally use the smaller resolution because it's
easier to see. Still, though, adoption of standards is a positive
John Horner wrote:
Speaking of redesigns, http://www.newyorker.com/ is looking very nice
these days. Not a table in sight.
but other than that it looks like a good standards-based website.
Yes, well, sort of...still the need (for me) to go through the drill of
ignoring their
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming the new 800x600, but it's
something that is probably ahead of its time. Especially since two members
I work at a newspaper... we are heading that direction for our next site
design iteration Content area will
Yeah the new web design at my australian government place is also currently
involved in a redesign and it is made for a 1024 screen (funny seeing the web
managers still use 800)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 28/03/2007 10:43 am
Mike at Green-Beast.com wrote:
Nice site. Looks like 1204x768 is becoming
