Title: [WSG] Which editors do you guys recommend?
For those that use notepad and type
everything in by hand, theres a far better answer for you
Ultraedit (ultraedit.com). It is a simple text editor, but it has syntax
highlighting, can handle files as big as your whole hard drive, can
At 05:07 on Sunday, 06 Jun 2004, helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
Topstyle Pro 3.1 is my choice. Simply the best windows application for
handcoding html / CSS includes most language syntax coloring and mapping
for local live previews via
Hi Mike,
You just saved me a heap of typing :-)
Its Ditto to for me, plus a bit:
ULtraEdit has to be one of the best text editors about
DreamWeaver when doing designy type stuff
HomeSite+ for pounding out code (my main task in life g)
TopStyle for the CSS
And responding to Dante's comment,
Neerav,
Doesn't look good in Safari 1.0, Neerav. (Submenus appear at the top of
the viewport.) Fine in Safari 1.2. No submenus in IE 5.2.3 Mac.
Is this acceptable to your client?
-Hugh Todd
Vertical Son of Suckerfish - Practical implementation at
http://www.rci.com.au
What a difference it
G'day Kym,
Anything to help a fellow traveller.
Now if only I could find some contract work to employ my skills gainfully.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Bert,
Don't know what constitutes 'wasting money' for you, but to me it makes
sense to buy a system with a commitment to open standards (and quite a
lot of open source as well) rather than one which seems to have as its
goal the sabotaging of open standards for the purpose of ensuring that
the
At 08:35 on Sunday, 06 Jun 2004, Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
Self explanatory, see subject.
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
http://www.scintilla.org/SciTE.html
small footprint.
code folding
loads of syntax highlighting
hth
Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
Self explanatory, see subject.
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
HTML-Kit.
--
Cristhian Palma
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+593.9.976 1992
*
The discussion list for
7 sinz, If you noticed, I wasn't using tables
http://www.english-sofas.co.uk/els_new/value_leather_sofas_0.htm. The
challenge was to incorporate fluid and centred linear lists. The presented
solution doesn't actually satisfy the requirement but does so for the client
(who loved the site then
Been there, Nick --
I am looking for a standard structure, a list (ul, li ...) which holds
images and associated captions centred in a fluid container.
e.g. -
-- [img] [img] [img] [img] [img] ... -
-- [img] [img] [img] [img] [img] ... -
-- [img] [img] [img] -
That's what we
John,
Without a doubt, TopStyle Pro 3.1 is the best around
http://www.bradsoft.com/topstyle/index.asp. A bold statement but I've used a
few and have settled on Nick's Delphi-written combined editor for about 15
months. It's a delight to use and extremely flexible, configuration-wise.
Mike Pepper
Recently Paul Scrivens (Whitespace) conducted a Non-scientific poll on
HTML/CSS Editors which attracted over 120 responses and so probably
constitutes one of the more compresnhensive discussions on this topic:
http://www.9rules.com/whitespace/our_thoughts/nonscientific_poll_htmlcss_editors.php
Hugh
Any choice has its +'s and -'s, as they say What you lose on the
swings, you gain on the roundabouts.
In this case:
Swings
* I lose the wide cross browser functionality of AJMenu
http://navsurf.com/menus/browsers.asp
* In a few older browser versions, or browsers that arent very popular
Wow. I (and no doubt every other Mac user in the world) will be shocked
and deeply perturbed to discover that we've wasted our money. I wonder
if Apple give refunds?
Let me suggest that the direction this thread is taking should stop
right here - it's gonna get off-topic (ie Mac v PC) really
I'm looking for something similar, wondering what a good html syntax could
be for this.
i need a title, image and a description:
-- Title Title2 Title3--
-- [img] descrip [img] descr [img] another --
-- tion of thislong --
-- image
On 6/6/04 2:42 AM Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Damn. No self contol. Sorry. I'm off for a Bex and a good lie down.
When in doubt, delete them.
I do.
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
- Original Message -
From: Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] Centering a liquid grid of image thumbs and captions
I have a 400MHz iMac you can have for $300 - that's less than a
software upgrade. I'll even
Without question, the best editor out there (at least until the next
version come out--which should be soon) is TopStyle 3.10. Full support
for XHTML 1.1 (a default template is missing, but can be added in under
a minute), CSS-2, and Ruby. It has code highlighting for several
scripting
On 6/6/04 3:39 AM Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Ruby
What is Ruby?
TIA
Rick Faaberg
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting
Nick thats a top idea, have done as you suggest, adding links to the
top level parts of the menu eg: Products.
Im sure you know that the probability of IE X (the next version) being
released as part of the next Windows Operating System is 100%, whereas
the chance of M'soft releasing a new IE
helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
vim. (and occasionally dreamweaver.)
no. really.
http://www.vim.org
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Is Google that hard to use?
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=ruby+editor
Can we send these directly to the person that requested it please and that
person can post the suggestions.
Also, just give positives. If you don't like 'product-x', then don't suggest
it. Trashing products on-list is not
On Sunday, June 6, 2004, at 08:59 PM, Neerav wrote:
Nick thats a top idea, have done as you suggest, adding links to the
top level parts of the menu eg: Products.
You're welcome.
Im sure you know that the probability of IE X (the next version) being
released as part of the next Windows
Rick Faaberg wrote:
On 6/6/04 3:39 AM Mordechai Peller [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this out:
Ruby
What is Ruby?
http://www.ruby-lang.org
it's an object-oriented scripting language. very powerful language, and
pushed object-oriented programming to its limit.
but this is now off-topic...
TIA
Rick
Subject: Re: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
hmm
Topstyle Pro 3.10 - CSS
Dreamweaver MX 2004 7.01 - XHTML/PHP
Browsers
Mozilla 1.7 RC1
IE 6 SP1
Opera 7.50
http://www.danvine.com/icapture/
Safari testing...
http://www.danvine.com/iecapture/
IE 6/5.5/5/4, Firefox Opera
I use jEdit. Has FTP and SFTP support. Lots and lots of plugins
to install.
helmut wrote:
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you guys use for hand coding and testing?
*
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Rick Faaberg wrote:
What is Ruby?
Contrary to what others seem to have thought, I meant the Ruby Annotation
specification from the W3C:
http://www.w3.org/TR/ruby/
I mentioned Ruby support not because I think it's that useful in most
instances, but rather what having the support says
Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
Self explanatory, see subject.
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
EditPlus http://editplus.com/ isn't free, as such, but it has an
unlimited unrestricted trial mode, and better syntax highlighting.
Also, it has a built in FTP
Original Message -
From: "helmut" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WSG] What Editors do you guys
use?
What CSS/XHTML/HTML editors do you
guys use for hand coding and testing?
I now use UltraEdit-32.
Simon
Jessey--mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]web :
Been seeing a lot mentioned about RUBY.
Can anyone point out some resources for
information on this besides W3C? W3C is great for a detailed technical overview
but seeing realistic real world examples and how it is used is more informative
from a designers standpoint.
Thanks.
Clean code = HomeSite 5.5!
Regards,
Amit Karmakar
www.karmakars.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Benjamin
Sent: Monday, 7 June 2004 1:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [WSG] What Editors do you guys use?
Homesite 5.5
Nick Gleitzman wrote:
Thanks again, Kristof. I appreciate the time you've put into this; I
have to get back to work too.
I'm not sure that even nesting tables would give the liquid layout;
I meant to reply on this:
-- [img] [img] [img] [img] [img] ... -
-- [img] [img] [img] [img] [img] ... -
--
This is my first post here... so I want to say hi
all and to quickly present myself: I'm Nicola... from Italy.
I'm a web designer with a great passion for this
job and now devoted to web standards too.
I'm redesigning our company's web site, here is a
link to check the new layout (if you
noa wrote:
Sean M. Hall AKA Dante wrote:
As I said before: syntax highlighting and no automatic insertion.
EditPlus http://editplus.com/ isn't free, as such, but it has an
unlimited unrestricted trial mode, and better syntax highlighting.
Also, it has a built in FTP browser.
+1
Worth 36* its
Title: Message
Ciao
belo,
And
that's all your getting because I don't know any Italian. :) That's
a nice layout. Clean and uses colours that lead the eye but don't drag
it. Only thing I can see that I might change is purely subjective and it
has to do with the black border at the very
Missing from the list is Context Programmers Editor.
http://www.fixedsys.com/context/
With my as yet limited skill set, I still treat it pretty much like Notepad, but it
has much, much
more to it than just text editing. Context provides syntax highlighting for a great
many programming
and
Thanks for that, Vlad. I'm still a long way off being able to make heads or tails of
the xsl. I can
follow what is going on, though.
Perhaps a little explanation would help me better understand what to expect from
screenreader.xsl
(private mail is okay, since this may be not be considered a
Iain Gardiner wrote:
Oh, and replacing the code-heavy javascript rollover effects with a more
lightweight option like Pixy's
(http://wellstyled.com/css-nopreload-rollovers.html) might be an option
you wish to consider.
As Iain suggested, it would be good to change the heavy navigation menu
From my bookmarks, these may help...
http://www.loudthinking.com/arc/000199.html
http://pine.fm/LearnToProgram/
http://poignantguide.net/ruby/
http://www.rubyonrails.org/show/HomePage
Cheers
dez
theGrafixGuy wrote:
Been seeing a lot mentioned about RUBY.
Can anyone point out some resources for
http://tsware.net/
TSW Web Coder, pretty cool app. Has great CSS support and can make it do
automatic xhtml syntax etc. and its free, (need valid email though, but
I haven't received any spam from it)
Tim Hill
Computer Associates
Graphic Artist
tel: +612 9937 0792
fax: +612 9937 0546
[EMAIL
Title: [WSG] What to do?
Dante,
Best
by example: rebuild without tables and say, Hey, this is how easy it is, would
you like me to do the rest for you? As it's a non-profit org, they will likely
be concerned about bandwidth and if, as you say, the site proves popular, the
bandwidth will go
Title: RE: [WSG] What to do?
Best by Example...
That's what I was going to do (in fact, I came really close, but a certain browser interfered and I gave up). Perhaps I'll try when I come back from Ireland.
He'll have to pay me in Sunflower Seeds (my latest addiction) since I'm under
Hello all
I have started a new category on the WSG site call Development and
design tools. I think at this point it would be a good idea for
everyone to login and start listing all these programs on the WSG
website so that we can refer to these in the future, without having to
navigate thru a
Thanks to Jeff and Kay, I have been able to clean up the site and code quite
a bit. Unfortunately, there are a couple of things that I cannot seem to get
a grasp on conceptually:
1. I don't understand why Mozilla is dropping the header down about 20px. I
don't have either padding or margins in
Hi Ward.
Ward and Andrea Scott wrote:
1. I don't understand why Mozilla is dropping the header down about 20px. I
don't have either padding or margins in either the container or the #top
header.
For this one, try setting padding /or margins of the h1 element to
zero. I just experienced the same
Id recommend against using
Image replacement in this instance as the only time itll be semantically
correct to have the header as the H1 element would be the homepage of the site.
e.g. on the news page - h2News Page - Style 2/h2 really should be:h1News Page - Style 2/h1
So Id just
People,
I did this site
over the last weekend.Still needs more work though.
The
siteseems to be working fine in most browsers except IE6. Bloody
IE
Any help to get it
working in IE v6/Win would be appreciated.
People on macs
would you mind giving me your feedback too. Thanks.
The
How would you go about selecting the markers on an ordered list to
style them? I want to style the 1,2,3,4 markers (or in this case, I.
II. III. IV. , as i have the style set to upper-roman) with things such
as size and color, but I can't figure out how to select just the
markers the closest
This is your problem:#navcontainer li a{display: block;padding: 5px 5px 5px 0.5em;border-left: 10px solid #326263;border-right: 10px solid #92C6C7;background-color: #498485;color: #EDF7F8;text-decoration: none;width: 100%; - you dont need this}
Cheers
Jeff Lowder
Accessibility 1st
49 matches
Mail list logo
