Sarah Peeke (XERT) writes:
Hi Philippe,
Japanese (and other East-Asian) language support is installed by
default on OS X.
Not so on Windows side of things (it comes with the install discs as
an extra package).
I've been told that Firefox/Win tries to display the text
nevertheless.
If
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:08 pm, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Also worth noting, with CJK text, in the absence of css specifying a
font, the browser will chose the font based on langauge of the text.
If the language of the text is not indicated then IE will try ot use a
Japanese font to display CJK,
(hence, out of curiosity, if someone would be kind enough to send me a
screenshot of the file I posted earlier, that would be appreciated).
I don't have a screen shot, because I have just installed the language
pack, however I can confirm that my Win PC showed ?? where the
text should have
Samuel Richardson wrote:
If you want to load entire web pages embedded into the current page you
will have to use the iframe, if just want to change simple text/html
within a div then you will have to use the innerhtml property (or use
this method that came up on delicious this morning:
Hi Everyone,
I just noticed Opera have opened the Opera Labs page and they now have
Opera 9 Preview 2 available for testing. The site has minimal content
at the moment (after all it just opened) but there is a short speil on
Opera supported web standards and the direction they are heading in:
found this interesting--
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20060206/tc_pcworld/124621
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list getting
Justin Carter said:
It truly is frustrating when FAQ pages hide everything with
invisible DIVs. As already mentioned it makes Ctrl-F useless (which
I personally find very annoying), and it also makes me click a whole
bunch of useless + symbols if I want to read more than one question on
the
From: Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] cool FAQ page [follow up]
Justin Carter said:
It truly is frustrating when FAQ pages hide everything with
invisible DIVs. As already
a marketing-oriented person would probably eat you for lunch
I doubt it. I spent over a decade in marketing =)
Besides, a solution for getting topics above the fold has already been
discussed in this thread.
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
**
The
From: Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] cool FAQ page [follow up]
a marketing-oriented person would probably eat you for lunch
I doubt it. I spent over a decade in marketing
Al Sparber said:
I spent 20 years designing and building some of the most upscale food
markets in America. So let's call it a push and move on, eh?
Your foo beats mine Al =)
kind regards
Terrence Wood.
**
The discussion list for
From: Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Cc: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] cool FAQ page [follow up]
Al Sparber said:
I spent 20 years designing and building some of the most upscale
food
markets in America.
Terrence Wood wrote:
a marketing-oriented person would probably eat you for lunch
I doubt it. I spent over a decade in marketing =)
Besides, a solution for getting topics above the fold has already been
discussed in this thread.
Which one are you referring to?
A serie of anchor links at the
Thierry Koblentz said:
AFAIK, it has been mentionned but not discussed;
Please.
I don't think it is better in term of usability/accessibility, and what
about semantic?
Why not? And what about semantics?
I believe the document is more coherent with the answers following the
questions rather
From: Terrence Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See above. I'm not sure there was agreement that a definition list
is the
semantic answer. What about headings for Q's and paras for A's. The
heading can be viewed in a document outline (by some browsers), and
it
avoids the whole Q/A is not a
On 2/8/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's another approach you're sure not to like :-)
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/swapclass/outline/
Hmm... it'd be nicer if there weren't anchor tags in there/the H3 were
used directly. Not being amazingly JavaScript saavy, is there a
Al Sparber said:
Here's another approach you're sure not to like :-)
http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/swapclass/outline/
Presume you are talking to me? Don't get me wrong Al, I love the
interactive aspect of the net and that is, in fact, what drew me to it in
the first place.
I'm not going
hiya,
i dont like flyout menus as much as the next guy/girl but i have a
situation that requires them, so i'm using the son of suckerfish menu
[1].
i'm having a problem with adding position:relative to items below the
menu, and those elements appearing on top of the flyout menus in IE.
i've
Philippe Wittenbergh writes:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:08 pm, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
Firefox Win takes the fonts as specified in the browser preferences
(ContentFont colors advanced).
It is actually somewhat more complicated than this.
firstly the unicode range will indicate what font
Pete, have you tried setting the z-index on them?
Peter Ottery wrote:
hiya,
i dont like flyout menus as much as the next guy/girl but i have a
situation that requires them, so i'm using the son of suckerfish menu
[1].
i'm having a problem with adding position:relative to items below the
menu,
Samuel wrote:
have you tried setting the z-index on them?
yeah, tried all sorts of z-index combinations (that i could think of)
but still cant get it working. theres a short note at the bottom of
that example page i put together...
**
The
I see you set a -1 z-index, what happens if you set say 10 and 100? (Are
negatives supported in the z-index?)
Peter Ottery wrote:
Samuel wrote:
have you tried setting the z-index on them?
yeah, tried all sorts of z-index combinations (that i could think of)
but still cant get it working.
Peter Ottery wrote:
hiya,
i dont like flyout menus as much as the next guy/girl but i have a
situation that requires them, so i'm using the son of suckerfish menu
[1].
Personally I don't like the suckerfish menus much. I found these much
more to my liking and you might like to have a look
Hi Pete,
I had the same issue before and had to add one line to the js code for
the drop-downs to hover on top. The extra line is commented.
Hope this helps,
Kenneth
startList = function() {
if (document.alldocument.getElementById) {
navRoot = document.getElementById(nav);
for (i=0;
success! housecleaningSam wrote:-- Are negatives supported in the z-index?
yes, more about z-index at pages like: http://www.echoecho.com/csslayers.htmRic wrote:
-- Personally I don't like the suckerfish menus much.--I found these much more to my
No problem Pete, glad to be of service.
The fix comes from an article by Nick Rigby that I found while trying to
figure out the same problem you had. You can read the article at
http://www.nickrigby.com/article/25/drop-down-menus-horizontal-style-pt-3.
The line of javascript is mentioned by
I just noticed Opera have opened the Opera Labs page and they now have
Opera 9 Preview 2 available for testing. The site has minimal content
at the moment (after all it just opened) but there is a short speil on
Opera supported web standards and the direction they are heading in:
Terrence Wood wrote:
Thierry Koblentz said:
AFAIK, it has been mentionned but not discussed;
Please.
Please what? I'm sorry but AFAIK when this option came up nobody mentionned
its pros and cons. Is it de facto *the* option because 2 people on this list
said so?
If I remember correctly, there
heretic wrote:
That said, I've noticed that despite Opera's commitment to standards,
the standards community really only gets excited about
Firefox/Safari (depending on your platform). Beats me why.
Me too. :-)
Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
race-horses?
On 2/8/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heretic wrote:
...
Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
race-horses? ;-)
Must be something to do with keeping nearer the earth. Opera spoils
web developers, and makes Internet Explorer (and Firefox, to a lesser
On 2/8/06, Joshua Street [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
heretic wrote:
...
Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
race-horses? ;-)
Must be something to do with keeping nearer the earth. Opera spoils
web
Maybe the standards community prefer to ride ponies instead of real
race-horses? ;-)
Must be something to do with keeping nearer the earth. Opera spoils
web developers, and makes Internet Explorer (and Firefox, to a lesser
extent) that much more shocking ;-)
hehehehh ahhh dear, we're the
32 matches
Mail list logo
