At 8/25/2009 10:11 PM, Andrew Harris wrote:
How do people get around the problem of marking up ordered lists in
legal documents, such as policies or terms and conditions?
A typical structure might look like:
1 blah blah blah
1.1 blah blah blah
1.2 blah blah blah
1.2.1 blah blah
If you use the freely availabel Microsoft Virtual PC you can run the also
freely available IE Compat images Microsoft provides. These are timebombed
which means you'll have to re-download them about every 3 to 4 months, but
it also saves you having to buy 3 separate Windows XP licenses to run the
For an example how to solve this take a look at
http://www.regels-stadskanaal.nl
It's an online archieve of the legislation of the city of Stadskanaal
in the Netherlands.
As you can see i've moved the nummers of the listitems to the content
of the documents.
Koen Willems
Citeren Andrew
This isn't a problem at all. It's a simple thing to do in HTML. Example:
ol
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah
ol
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah
ol
liBlah
This straight OL does not work from a pure XHTML 1.0 Strict perspective
unless your legal documents conform to the browsers' default list numbering
scheme.
The *'type'* attribute is not valid in XHTML 1.0 which really annoys me to
no end, since I work for a county government. The numbering in a
This isn't work correctly: 'counter-reset' and other CSS styles for
this nested lists not supported by IE.
2009/8/26 Jason Grant ja...@flexewebs.com:
This isn't a problem at all. It's a simple thing to do in HTML. Example:
ol
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah/li
liBlah Blah
Anthony - what's there to 'understand'? This is the semantically correct way
to mark up this particular set of data.
Simple as.
By all means you should be able to style up looking pixel perfect the same
across any browser under the Sun.
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Antony Gr.
Inspect the TOC of this page and see that the markup I used is essentially
correct. The difference is that they wrote the numbers down into the page
(i.e. 1.1, 4.11, 5., etc.)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
If unsure, use a W3C page as a reference point :-)
Cheers,
Jason
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at
IE not understand this. You don't agree?
2009/8/26 Jason Grant ja...@flexewebs.com:
Inspect the TOC of this page and see that the markup I used is essentially
correct.
The difference is that they wrote the numbers down into the page (i.e. 1.1,
4.11, 5., etc.)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/
If
Jason, the markup you presented is semanticly ok, but doesn't solve the
issue topic starter mentioned.
See the example site i've given before for a solution,
http://www.regels-stadskanaal.nl
Koen Willems
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
Good afternoon list,
Does anybody know if their exists a list of what is required in terms of
accessibility
features for each country (governments)?
--
Regards,
Luc
_
http://www.dzinelabs.com
Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.2.6 with
Windows
Here in the Netherlands we have http://www.webrichtlijnen.nl/english/
Koen Willems
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: li...@webstandardsgroup.org
[mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] Namens Luc
Verzonden: woensdag 26 augustus 2009 20:41
Aan: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Onderwerp: [WSG]
In Canada, public facing federal government websites must adhere to the
Common Look and Feel for the Internet, which includes an accessibility
component heavily based on WCAG 1.0.
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/clf2-nsi2/index-eng.asp
http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/clf2-nsi2/clfs-nnsi/clfs-nnsi-2-eng.asp
HTML5 should *never *include specifications for what you're asking. From an
pure HTML standpoint, you should never be specifying what type of numbering
scheme to use, just how to structure list items. The context of *type* you
speak of is presentational. Maybe a *class=legal* attribute might
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Lucl...@dzinelabs.com wrote:
Good afternoon list,
Does anybody know if their exists a list of what is required in terms of
accessibility
features for each country (governments)?
--
Regards,
Luc
Hi Luc,
here in Australia we have a couple of pieces of
In the USA, federal government web sites, and those web sites were federal
tax dollars are involved, are subject to accessibility requirements of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. This is more commonly known as
Section 508 --- http://www.section508.gov/ Many state governments and
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Lucl...@dzinelabs.com wrote:
Good afternoon list,
Does anybody know if their exists a list of what is required in terms of
accessibility
features for each country (governments)?
--
Regards,
Luc
Hi Luc,
here in Australia we have a
As a general rule of thumb best practice would be to follow W3C guidelines.
Cheers,
Rae
2009/8/27 Webb, KerryA kerrya.w...@act.gov.au
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Lucl...@dzinelabs.com wrote:
Good afternoon list,
Does anybody know if their exists a list of what is required in
It's not that simple. We are working with some UK Government departments
that still use WCAG 1.0 and will continue to do so until well into 2010.
Other departments have already adopted WCAG 2.0.
To answer the question, I do not believe such a list exists, and it would
require continuous
Very useful links thanks Andrew
On 27/08/2009, at 7:27 AM, Andrew Boyd faci...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:40 AM, Lucl...@dzinelabs.com wrote:
Good afternoon list,
Does anybody know if their exists a list of what is required in
terms of accessibility
features for each
Good evening list,
Many thanks for the replies. Indeed, i was looking for a general
list but as Steve pointed out, this would be difficult to maintain
due to governments switching.
--
Regards,
Luc
_
http://www.dzinelabs.com
Using the best e-mail client: The
Luc wrote:
Good evening list,
Many thanks for the replies. Indeed, i was looking for a general
list but as Steve pointed out, this would be difficult to maintain
due to governments switching.
W3C WAI has a list of Policies Relating to Web Accessibility for several countries
at
There's also a guide for Australian Government agencies here:
http://webpublishing.agimo.gov.au/
As a couple of people have said... at the end of the day it's just different
flavours of W3C
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
http://www.gcio.nsw.gov.au/products-and-services/policies-guidelines/UsabilityAssessmentChecklist.pdf/view?searchterm=style%20guide
--
Regards,
Diganta Kumar
m: 0408267082
e: mailtodiga...@gmail.com
w: adsinfotech.com.au
linkedIn: linkedin.com/in/digantakumar
blog: digantakumar.com
twitter:
Hello Shawn,
It was foretold that
on 26/08/2009 @ 19:45:38 GMT-0500 (which was 21:45:38 where I live)
Shawn Henry would write:
Tnx Shawn :-)
SH W3C WAI has a list of Policies Relating to Web Accessibility
SH for several countries at http://www.w3.org/WAI/Policy/ Indeed,
SH it is
25 matches
Mail list logo
