On 2/27/07, kevin zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm creating my table dynamically - for instance, using ASP.NET tech to pull
data from a database.Question is how can i use css to mark up my table?
any idea?
Why is the back-end relevant? The mark-up is still a table when the
browser receives
On 3/30/07, Jeremy Boggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm working on a website that contains a number of poems. Are there
any discussions or examples on strategies for marking up and styling
poetry?
Poetry is one of the few times when it's semantically correct to use
br, IMO. For example,
On 5/27/07, Katrina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In some sense, the label and input are thematically related.
Interesting idea, and in a way I agree. However I still think, in
combination with fieldsets and appropriate form elements, that a ul is
an appropriate way to mark up form controls. For
Keep it up and you'll get your page size back up to nested table
levels ;-)
I was expecting a response like that. As I said, it is over the top,
but it is an idea of how far things can go if you try too hard to
pursue semantics. Sometimes the goal post is a little too far away,
and we can only
On 6/5/07, Lucien Stals [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML 4 specs say...
The FIELDSET element allows authors to group thematically related
controls and labels...
While controls and labels refer to form controls, the fieldset
itself can contain anything. My opinion would be that the important
generally on the same side on this list.
Regards,
Blake
--
Australian Web Designer - http://www.blakehaswell.com/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
My general school of thought is that usability is a product of good UI
design and accessibility is a product of good coding practice. Of
course UI design and coding overlap, in that they both impact both
fields, so it is the job of the designer AND front-end developer to
make things tick for as
Add a width to the containing element to 'brace' the page so that it
can't shrink below the width of the container element. Make sure that
width is wide enough to accomodate the floated layout as you want it.
Regards,
Blake
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Taco Fleur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
: inline; } that overwrited the browsers default
of { display: none; }.
Hope that clears it up.
Cheers,
Blake
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Rob Enslin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently built a website trying to move towards more
standards-compliant code. After the delight at pushing the site live my
world 'caved in' (a little over-dramatic maybe) this morning when a
colleague noticed rogue 'ls.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Ben Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Normally I'd use spans for all 3 elements, but I'm quite interested to find
out a better way of doing this.
Did you manage to find a solution to this?
Normally I use DIVs with appropriate class names.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Semantically, isn't the whole point of a dl to use definition data tags
(dd's) to describe a definition title (dt)!? Does it make sense to have
multiple definition titles in the same dl?! Or does it make more sense to
have a seperate dl
Indeed. We have some very clunky sites and they loaded almost
instantly. I couldn't believe the rendering speed.
However Gmail won't load on any computers with Chrome on at work (in
fact, I can't sign in to any google services). Is this problem
affecting everyone or is it just our network? If
Oh, the browser works fine. I can access everything except google
services which require me to login. It just attempts to redirect to
their authentication page and kind of... stops. Loads for a while then
nothing, just a blank white page.
Again, only Google services, so kind of epic fail.
On
Question: does Chrome actually record your browsing and send that
information back to Google or are people just freaking over nothing?
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Andrew Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee,
my take on the legal stuff as it may apply to bloggers and other web content
Seems about par for the course.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Anton Babushkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
people are just freaking over nothing.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Robin Shi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the page has been scrolled down or up, whatever, the JS will reposition
the div to make sure it's not outside of the view.
Is it just me, or could you not use position: fixed?
--
Blake Haswell
http://www.blakehaswell.com
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Robin Shi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Blake,
In my experience, position: fixed seems not work with IE.
Robin
Ah. I've never actually had to use it.
--
Blake Haswell
http://www.blakehaswell.com
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Robin Gorry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.mucu4u.org.nz/Home_61.aspx
http://www.oneeast.co.nz/
http://www.colorfastsigns.co.nz/Home_34.aspx
None of those sites validate.
***
List Guidelines:
: -px; width: 100px; }
And that's just a CSS example, not to mention the time saved
developing HTML templates, JavaScript, PHP, etc. Choosing the right
text editor for what you do can save a HUGE amount of time.
--
Blake Haswell
http://www.blakehaswell.com/ | http://blakehaswell.wordpress.com
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Anthony Ziebell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, it's certainly not spam. It's been all over news, whirlpool, everywhere.
Yes, it's definitely real. I feel ashamed of being Australian right there.
--
Blake Haswell
http://www.blakehaswell.com/ | http
luck to the Facebook user without JavaScript enabled. o_O
--
Blake Haswell
http://www.blakehaswell.com/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Mike Kear w...@afpwebworks.com wrote:
Google Chrome now amounts to over half the traffic on these sites.
Wow, that's the first time I've seen Chrome over 4%.
Why are these stats so scewed, if I may ask?
--
Blake
http://www.blakehaswell.com
On 4/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, relying on the form data to indicate which fields to
validate may be dangerous - a malicious user may rename the field before
submission, potentially bypassing your security.
Well obviously you'd validate again on the
On 4/24/07, Shane Helm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I would bring this before the group to hear your opinions
on using dropdown menus. How do you feel about them? What is the
best method for usability?
I think they have their place, and with modern browsers it's not such
a problem in
showing that something is less important
relative to the surrounding content?
Regards,
Blake
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help
Specific to your situation, I question whether an article's date or
its supplementary text is really best characterized as being less
important than the article itself. That doesn't strike me as a
useful semantic distinction. In the absence of markup elements
date and supplement, you may be
27 matches
Mail list logo
