, Hobart TAS 7001
www.spiegelweb.com.au
-Original Message-
From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On
Behalf Of David Laakso
Sent: Tuesday, 26 January 2010 8:07 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: [WSG] :: makeready ::
Comments and suggestions on this site
Elizabeth Spiegel wrote:
Hi David
Not a comment about your code, but your information design.
Why are the images/examples of effective use scattered across the site and
in some cases repeated? Why not place them on a 'using our product' (or
similar) page?
Elizabeth Spiegel
Elizabeth,
, 2010 9:07 AM
Subject: [WSG] :: makeready ::
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/css/style.css
Thanks.
~d
Not a very useful comment perhaps, but I hate the colour of the banner, and
the bright blue
designer wrote:
Hi David,
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/css/style.css
Thanks.
~d
Not a very useful comment perhaps, but I hate the colour of the
banner, and
the bright blue of the menu is
Lesley Lutomski wrote:
Hi David,
I also have a problem with the double border on the menu items,
combined with the underlining of the links - too many lines too close
together. I have neurological problems, which may partly account for
my reaction here, but I asked my husband and he also
- Original Message -
From: David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WSG] :: makeready ::
Flattery will get you nowhere (corrections on server).
~d
Much better! The menu is static and the red
David,
I missed the items other mentioned, but it looks fine right now. The
only item I wonder about is the thick border below the navigation that
touches the double border directly below it. I'd use one or the other
rather than both. That's me though. It looks like a CSS oops to me.
No
Joseph Taylor wrote:
David,
The only item I wonder about is the thick border below the navigation
that touches the double border directly below it. I'd use one or the
other rather than both. That's me though. It looks like a CSS oops
to me. No normal people will mind it though.
Joseph
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/css/style.css
Hi David,
Minor things: I think the h1 looks small and that there is not enough
padding around the text in the menu. I think more padding would
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/css/style.css
Hi David,
Minor things: I think the h1
Bumped. On server.
looks small and that there is not enough
padding around
Hi David,
Great improvement, thank you. You wouldn't believe just how much that
improves the usability for me.
Lesley
David Laakso wrote:
Lesley Lutomski wrote:
Hi David,
I also have a problem with the double border on the menu items,
combined with the underlining of the links - too
Lesley Lutomski wrote:
Hi David,
Great improvement, thank you. You wouldn't believe just how much that
improves the usability for me.
Lesley
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
Cool. I will have to remember that in the future. Thank you for bringing
it to my
At 1/26/2010 01:07 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
The blank alt attributes for the foreground images are brow-wrinklers
for me. When an image is in the foreground I figure that it is
content that
Paul Novitski wrote:
At 1/26/2010 01:07 AM, David Laakso wrote:
Comments and suggestions on this site appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mhr/
The blank alt attributes for the foreground images are brow-wrinklers
for me. When an image is in the foreground I figure that it is
OK. Know from nothing about tables. Will look into.
David, I found this article a help in getting started with marking up
tables correctly.
article by Zoe Gillenwater
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=0BEA6
Duncan
Duncan Hill wrote:
OK. Know from nothing about tables. Will look into.
David, I found this article a help in getting started with marking up
tables correctly.
article by Zoe Gillenwater
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=0BEA6
Duncan
Thanks!
~d
--
desktop
I am currently out of the office returning Monday 18th of January 2010.
If the matter is urgent please contact Jeff Smart on 6270 6983.
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
Duncan Hill wrote:
The 'flare' image on the home page is much better, on the original I
thought the burned out highlights were too intrusive and distracting.
That is good news. I think it looks better, too -- although perhaps a
little too dark for the rest of the page...
I liked the
On this page, in Safari 4.0.4:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/site/portfolio/07.php
The left vertical nav links can be hovered and used while mousing in
the blank space to the left of the nav text. Is this intentional?
Thought you might want to know.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David
Tom Livingston wrote:
On this page, in Safari 4.0.4:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ca/site/portfolio/07.php
The left vertical nav links can be hovered and used while mousing in
the blank space to the left of the nav text. Is this intentional?
Thought you might want to know.
I'd
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Best,
~d
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
I can see you are an artist. It looks like a website that's been designed by
an artist.
Looking at the site in Firefox my first reaction is to want to drag it to
the left. Somehow being right aligned it feels uncomfortable - I wonder why
the white space on the left.
I was also a little puzzled
Chris Price wrote:
Looking at the site in Firefox my first reaction is to want to drag it
to the left. Somehow being right aligned it feels uncomfortable - I
wonder why the white space on the left.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
--
Chris Price
So drag it to a 640 window?
Best,
- Original Message -
From: David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
It's very nice - it's clean, the importance of graphic design/typography
shows in the design, and it exhumes a sense of
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:13 PM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.com wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
I would prefer if set 1 were expanded by default, and if set 1
through set 3 were presented as tabs on the same line,
@webstandardsgroup.org
cc
Subject
Re: [WSG] :: makeready ::
I can see you are an artist. It looks like a website that's been designed
by an artist.
Looking at the site in Firefox my first reaction is to want to drag it to
the left. Somehow being right aligned it feels uncomfortable - I
designer wrote:
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
However - there is always a 'BUT' - for my taste it's lopsided!
O.K., now tell me you spent hours making the spacing work that way
because it's what you wanted!
Bob
Hours? Hours nothing: it took a lifetime that spacing, Bob :-) .
27 matches
Mail list logo