Ok. I added a min-width to the #content which seems to stop the page breaking up under 1000px. I also used the _javascript_ fix for IE but... now then it seemed that IE dropped apart at widths OVER 1200px! So.. I added 'position:relative' to the #content - seems to always fix most IE probs! - but
Adam Morris wrote:
Ok. I added a min-width to the #content which seems to stop the
page breaking up under 1000px. I also used the javascript fix for IE
but... now then it seemed that IE dropped apart at widths OVER
1200px! So.. I added 'position:relative' to the #content - seems to
always
Georg,
Saturday, February 25, 2006, 9:47:58 AM, you wrote:
GS Adam Morris wrote:
Ok. I added a min-width to the #content which seems to stop the
page breaking up under 1000px. I also used the javascript fix for IE
but... now then it seemed that IE dropped apart at widths OVER
1200px!
I've just made the background images 3000px wide to cover the gaps that open up and, I think, I've narrowed the container - although I'm not sure now!.. It also now seems not to break in IE at widths over 1200px.. Am I right? My Virtual PC browser window doesn't allow me to stretch the site much
Adam Morris wrote:
I've just made the background images 3000px wide to cover the gaps
that open up and, I think, I've narrowed the container - although I'm
not sure now!.. It also now seems not to break in IE at widths over
1200px.. Am I right? My Virtual PC browser window doesn't allow me
to
Really? I thought I'd done everything the project 7 site told me.. ie. change the two things: the div and the size. What have I missed, Gunlaug?On 25/02/06,
Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The min-width _javascript_ doesn't have the correct values for yourlayout, so it is jumping a bit at
Adam Morris wrote:
Really? I thought I'd done everything the project 7 site told me..
ie. change the two things: the div and the size. What have I missed,
Gunlaug?
On 25/02/06, Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The min-width javascript doesn't have the correct values for your
Hi everyone!Been trying to make this site I'm building fluid after seeing it on a huge monitor in my local Mac store and marvelling at how teeny weeny it looked!The site is at
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwishMy attempts at getting fluid is
Title: Re: [WSG] Fluid layout
On 2/24/06 2:18 PM, Adam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not quite there yet.
Or try a look at 800 wide...
Sorry, no time to peek at it. Just an FYI...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Adam Morris wrote:
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish
Observation:
Fine, 840 - 3800.
...looks like any other fixed-width pages around.
http://www.megustalatelevision.com/uwish/index1.html
Observation:
Main column drops below 1000px.
OK (more or less), 1024 - 1600.
Background-problems
On 06/02/24 16:04 Gunlaug Sørtun apparently typed:
Personal preference: I don't think text-lines should be wider than 600 -
800px on any monitor, as long lines are generally harder to follow and
read than somewhat width-limited ones. Max-width might work for you.
Speaking of sizing things in
Felix Miata wrote:
Speaking of sizing things in px, particularly line lengths, when
discussing fluid layouts, makes no sense to me. I find an 800px line
length perfectly fine, and a 500px line length rather short, when I'm
using a 28px default. Line lengths are better set relative to text
12 matches
Mail list logo
