Re: [WSG] Just for fun

2004-09-26 Thread Neerav
Not bad, the only differences I could tell were quite minor Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT consultancy Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27 http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/ - Ramblings Thoughts http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/neerav Ryan Christie wrote: I was taking requests to

Re: [WSG] Just for fun

2004-09-26 Thread Chris Stratford
Very Interesting! Just goes to show how much better CSS Developed sites are - bandwidth wise. Thanks for the great example! Neerav wrote: Not bad, the only differences I could tell were quite minor Neerav Bhatt http://www.bhatt.id.au Web Development IT consultancy Mobile: +61 (0)403 8000 27

Re: [WSG] Just for fun

2004-09-26 Thread Chris Kennon
Hi, How does one acquire such stats, from the ISP or client-side utility? C On Saturday, September 25, 2004, at 10:45 PM, Ryan Christie wrote: I was taking requests to do a mock-up of a tables site into a CSS layout last week because the office was pretty slow all of Friday. I figured I'd share

Re: [WSG] Just for fun

2004-09-26 Thread Ryan Christie
How does one acquire such stats, from the ISP or client-side utility? I just use the find replace method in Dreamweaver MX 2004 and count the instances of any given tag :) Probably not the best way to parse a HTML file, but It works. Bert had mentioned there was a lot of DIVs, I'll just

[WSG] Just for fun

2004-09-25 Thread Ryan Christie
I was taking requests to do a mock-up of a tables site into a CSS layout last week because the office was pretty slow all of Friday. I figured I'd share the outcome with the group. Original Stats: Tables: 31 Font Tags: 294 DIVs: 167 HTML size: 68.4kb New Stats: Tables: 3 Font Tags: 0 DIVs: 38