or not to display validation logos?
Perhaps we need a simple page to link to, explaining what standards are
for,in terms that the non-tech viewer can appreciate?
I like that idea...
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.306
:o)
Cheers,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stevio
Sent: 26 February 2005 14:00
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] To display or not to display validation logos?
Has anyone written anything like this we could use
Steven wrote:
Also, excuse my slight ignorance here, but just because a page validates as
XHTML and CSS compatible, does that make it accessible?
True. It doesn't even necessarily mean that it's semantically correct,
as there tends to be a trend in pages that just consist of a load of
divs
I think you pretty much answered your own question already. :)
Leslie Riggs
I am just about to complete a new site for a client, and I have coded
it according to XHTML 1.0 strict guidelines. I am also using validated
CSS. Do you think it is worth displaying the W3C compliance logos at
the
I personally try to place this information in the accessibility statement.
--
Jan Brasna aka JohnyB :: alphanumeric.cz | janbrasna.com
Stop IE! - http://www.stopie.com/ | http://browsehappy.com/
**
The discussion list for
@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: [WSG] To display or not to display validation logos?
I am just about to complete a new site for a client, and I have coded it
according to XHTML 1.0 strict guidelines. I am also using validated CSS.
Do
you think it is worth displaying
@webstandardsgroup.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: [WSG] To display or not to display validation logos?
I am just about to complete a new site for a client, and I have coded it
according to XHTML 1.0 strict guidelines. I am also using validated CSS.
Do
you think
Perhaps we need a simple page to link to, explaining what standards are
for,in terms that the non-tech viewer can appreciate?
I like that idea...
--
regards, Kornel Lesiski
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
