RE: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-02 Thread Jamie Mason
Title: RE: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question Thanks all, I thought 2 was the way to be doing it, I'm sure I'd read on the W3C though that they had to be used to structure an ordered numerical hierarchy, but I can't imagine many practical examples where you might do this. Thanks again

Re: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-01 Thread Jason Foss
I can't see any problems with your second example in theory - but it's an impossible question to answer without content. Remember that (X)HTML elements are supposed to describe or explain (for want of better words) the content that they are marking up. So there aren't any rules as to how header

Re: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-01 Thread Tonico Strasser
Jamie Mason wrote: Hi, I'm sure this has been asked time and time again and is probably a daft question, but which is the proper way to use header tags? Thanks in advance for your patience and help! Depends on what you want to optimize. Tonico

Re: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-01 Thread Bert Doorn
G'day Think of the headings as a collapsible outline, with sections and sub-sections, each with a heading of the *appropriate* level. Collapse it (as one can do in Word for instance) and you should see an outline made up of headings that makes sense. Each h2 belongs to a sub-section of the

Re: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-01 Thread Karl Brightman
Have to remember that search engines will read the contents of header tags so i think best way is for heading text, titles etc. For list headings i think it would be easier to using a seperate style. The second option i think is the better way to go though, just for organization and nice and

RE: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question

2005-02-01 Thread Trusz, Andrew
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lea de Groot Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:18 AM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] Quick h1,h2 etc question On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:11:57 -, Jamie Mason wrote: 2) With the exception