RE: [WSG] books

2008-03-06 Thread Spellacy, Michael
DOM Scripting: Web Design with JavaScript and the Document Object Model by Jeremy Keith Bulletproof Ajax (also by Keith) was good as well. Regards, Spell Michael Spellacy Senior User Interface Developer TMP Worldwide Advertising Communications, LLC www.tmp.com

RE: [WSG] Google chrome... Coming very soon...

2008-09-02 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Heh. Looks like somebody at Google is a big fan of Understanding Comics By Scott McCloud. This is nice though. Regards, Spell Michael Spellacy Senior User Interface Developer TMP Worldwide Advertising Communications, LLC 205 Hudson Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10013 -Original

RE: [WSG] .NET sites which are XHTML 1.0 strict

2008-10-08 Thread Spellacy, Michael
I've built a couple XHTML 1.0 strict sites via .NET. Let me know how this goes for ya: http://careers.deloitte.com/sbf/default.aspx Regards, Spell -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of silky Sent: Tue 10/7/2008 11:25 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re:

[WSG] SEO vs. Accessibility

2009-05-26 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hello list! I have a quick question for any accessibility and SEO mavens out there. It was recently brought to my attention that a few elements I have placed on a site that have text indented px to the left for accessibility might be viewed as a form of cloaking by some search engines. Is my

RE: [WSG] Help with mobile MIME type always fails test

2010-04-19 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Funny this should come up as I felt like being fussy a couple of weeks ago. If you happen to be building a site with dotNet (.NET) 2008 you can override the server MIME type inline by adding the following to the @Page directive: contenttype=application/xhtml+xml This comes in handy if you have a

[WSG] Video Accessibility Help

2010-06-15 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hi List, I was just wondering what some of the best practices were these days for creating accessible video on the web. A few questions: 1) I know some Flash players can pull in captions, but which ones to use? 2) Are there any services out there that will scan your audio track and create a

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-15 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hi Kevin, Regardless of what you are declaring in your meta tags, the server will trump you here and serve out the page as it is configured to do so (as text/html), in which case you'll have to configure the server to serve the page out with correct mime type. I don't know what you are using

RE: [WSG] Mobile Page Passes but MIME Type Fails

2010-06-16 Thread Spellacy, Michael
As I mentioned earlier, try checking to see what MIME type the server is returning the page as. That may be the issue. Regards, Michael Spell Spellacy http://www.spellacy.net @spellacy -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [WSG] Video Accessibility Help

2010-08-18 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Every little bit helps, John. These look like good places to start. Thank you. If anybody else has anything to share please keep it coming. I stumbled upon a site called subply.com which will create caption files (in various flavors) based on the audio track in video. It seems like a

[WSG] Accessible Modal/Lightbox Code

2011-05-17 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hi List! A colleague of mine is looking for accessible modal window code. Anything good out there? Thanks in advance! Regards, Spell *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe:

RE: [WSG] Accessible Modal/Lightbox Code

2011-05-18 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Thanks for the input on this one, folks! Spell *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org

[WSG] Accessibility Testing

2011-06-24 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hi WSG Friends! The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test code against specific accessibility guidelines like WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. Do any of you know of any cheaper (or free) applications that do just

RE: [WSG] Accessibility Testing

2011-06-24 Thread Spellacy, Michael
? On 6/25/2011 2:15 AM, Spellacy, Michael wrote: Hi WSG Friends! The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test code against specific accessibility guidelines like WCAG 1.0 or 2.0. Do any of you know

RE: [WSG] Accessibility Testing

2011-06-24 Thread Spellacy, Michael
...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Spellacy, Michael Sent: 24 June 2011 17:16 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG] Accessibility Testing Hi WSG Friends! The company I work for is considering dropping WatchFire for testing because of the price. I'm really concerned about not being able to test code against

Re: [WSG] Out of Office

2011-10-26 Thread Spellacy, Michael
2001? Do you own a time machine? :-) Regards, Spell Sent from my iPod On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:42 PM, m...@inetsgi.com m...@inetsgi.com wrote: I will be out of the office until October 27th, 2001. If you have an urgent matter contact Kevin at ke...@inetsgi.com or dial 402.330.0636 x1005.

[WSG] Safari: Inline-Block / Center Element Issue

2012-01-05 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Hi Guys, A collogue of mine came across a weird issue today on Safari regarding the alignment on inline-block level elements such as input and select within a ...wait for it...center element. We came up with a work-around (the most obvious being NOT to use the center element whenever humanly

RE: [WSG] Safari: Inline-Block / Center Element Issue

2012-01-06 Thread Spellacy, Michael
You find it difficult to avoid using a tag that was deprecated over a dozen years ago in HTML4 and doesn't exist at all in HTML5? Wow. Heh. I certainly don't find it difficult nor did I say where it was used (For all you know the site could be a decade old!). Regardless, all browsers appear

RE: [WSG] Safari: Inline-Block / Center Element Issue

2012-01-06 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Your test page is using HTML5, so it's hardly a decade old -- and a quick run through the W3C Validator will tell you, and I quote, I copied it from original source to document issue better. DOCTYPE is irrelevant here. Okay, great. It's a Webkit issue. That is good to know. Thanks! So why you

RE: [WSG] Possibly the best CSS framework ever?

2012-04-02 Thread Spellacy, Michael
At first I was like...whhhaaattt? Then I remembered the date. Thanks, Russ. Spell -Original Message- From: li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] On Behalf Of Russ Weakley Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 11:28 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: [WSG]

[WSG] Responsive Design Cost

2012-04-02 Thread Spellacy, Michael
Folks, Now that some of us have been doing RWD for a little while, I was just wondering, on average, how long it takes some of you to code a typical page. I know there are many variables involved, so let's just focus on your run of the mill layout. Header, Primary Navigation, Secondary