Just out of interest Stuart, do you feel that there is a contrast issue
in your article heading text? On my screens the bg grey is quite dark.
Cheers
James
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Thanks John,
It took a while but the answer I was looking for came along. Thank
you! Your web site is very
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Are any of the validation tools: Bobby, Cynthiasays, Watchfire...more
respected then the others?
Regards,
Stuart.
You can use any of these, and all of them, but you should combine them
with your own knowledge base and common sense. I also use Marc Gueury's
HTML
.
Grant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Geoff Deering
Sent: Wednesday, 24 August 2005 5:02 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility, the possibilities
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Are any of the validation tools: Bobby
Thank you so much! You just made my life about a million times easier!
dp.
On 23/08/05, Peter Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Pietersen ...tools/techniques for doing the below? Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML* CSS* WAI* Section 508David,The W3C maintain a useful website
With cache cleared and connected directly to the internet I started
to suspect some dns shenanigans. I get Rick and Peter's behaviour
from my home box, but from my work machine I see things differently.
Try http://69.93.55.164/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Cheers,
Damian
On 8/22/05
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Hi All,
First, I'd just like to check I understand something correctly.
Validation for WAI AAA = WCAG 1.0 Priority 3. Is this correct?
Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML
* CSS
* WAI
* Section 508
And I've recently learnt about accessibility checks
Might be a propagation thing. Try http://69.93.55.164/ for the new site.
Vicki. :-)
--
Vicki Berry
DistinctiveWeb
http://www.distinctiveweb.com.au
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
Stuart Sherwood wrote:
Hi All,
If you pass all these test, does this exhaust all accessibility
issues or are there more?
Stuart,
There are also the soft tests - often these deal with areas of
cognitive issues, from dyslexia to English as a second or third
language, etc. Consider the
John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote:
There are in fact checkpoints under all three Priorities which require
brain intervention - they simply cannot be tested mechanically. Try
running a page through something like Cynthia says
(http://www.cynthiasays.com) will quickly show you what needs to be
John Foliot - WATS.ca wrote:
There are in fact checkpoints under all three Priorities which require
brain intervention - they simply cannot be tested mechanically. Try
running a page through something like Cynthia says
(http://www.cynthiasays.com) will quickly show you what needs to be
From: Damian Sweeney
Try http://69.93.55.164/topics/userscience/accessibility/
So, there really is a new A List Apart.
Hopefully DNS propogation will proceed apace and we can all
enjoy the new look and feel :-)
--
Peter Williams
**
The
User testing?
On 23/08/05, Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
First, I'd just like to check I understand something correctly.
Validation for WAI AAA = WCAG 1.0 Priority 3. Is this correct?
Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML
* CSS
* WAI
* Section
Hi all,
Sorry to be a pain, but I am new to this list. Is there a place somewhere that lists the tools/techniques for doing the below?
Ok, we can validate for: * W3C HTML/XHTML * CSS * WAI * Section 508And I've recently learnt about accessibility checks for: * Colour blindness * Contrast *
Hey
Dave,
Try looking
ingoogle 1st ;)
.
Ben
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of David
PietersenSent: Tuesday, 23 August 2005 2:29 p.m.To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: Re: [WSG] Accessibility, the
possibilities
Hi all,
Sorry
Sorryall, That was meant to
be off-list.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ben Wrighton -
StraightForwardSent: Tuesday, 23 August 2005 2:53 p.m.To:
wsg@webstandardsgroup.orgSubject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility, the
possibilities
Hey
Dave
From: David Pietersen
...tools/techniques for doing the below?
Ok, we can validate for:
* W3C HTML/XHTML
* CSS
* WAI
* Section 508
David,
The W3C maintain a useful website that has validators for x/html and
css.
http://validator.w3.org/
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design
and
structure
alistapart has many articles on accesibility
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
should be:
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Damian
**
From: Damian Sweeney
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new design
alistapart has many articles on accesibility
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
should be:
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Damian,
Your link gave me a 404. I'm really not sure
Well, this is curious.
I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
and a page full of articles for
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
Can anyone break this deadlock?
Damian
From: Damian Sweeney
Hmm, alistapart is back with a funky new
On 8/22/05 10:18 PM Damian Sweeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent this
out:
I get a 404 for http://www.alistapart.com/topics/accessibility/
Works for me.
and a page full of articles for
http://www.alistapart.com/topics/userscience/accessibility/
404
Okay, now everybody immediately clear caches
20 matches
Mail list logo
