Hi. Thanks to all who continue to develop and enhance WSJT-X.
I have been following this thread with interest. A first glance
frequency hopping within an SSB "channel" sounds interesting and that is
something I expect I would at least try if the functionality was
available. From my
Hi. To somewhat echo a comment made by Roger W3SZ, if a new version of
WSJT-X that utilized AVX provided significant performance enhancements
(especially for MSK144) that would likely prompt me to use a faster
computer while roving. At this point if a computer will run (with a
reasonable CPU
Also as far as I can tell the Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU in my Panasonic
Tough book does not support AVX.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
Hi:
The oldest PC I still routinely run WSJT-X with has a CPU with the
following specs (from the control panel systems tab)
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9300@2.26Ghz 2.27 Ghz
64 bit Operating System
The PC in question is a Panasonic Tough book that I use during portable use
and roving.
Thanks
I will say I agree with the concerns expressed by Alan G0TLK about USB
enumeration. For that and other reasons I am hesitant to use additional
USB devices while engaging in portable operation or roving.
Mike W9MDB, thanks for making TimeFudge available I shall have to try that.
Thanks all and
A few comments regarding this topic from the perspective of someone who
does most of their WSJT-X operating from portable locations.
It is nice to be able to operate without needing an automated means of
keeping the computer clock synced to an external source. Most of the time
an initial manual
Hi.
Thanks for all the efforts that the dev team has put into the latest
version of WSJT-X. I have started doing my pre June VHF contest
preparations and noted some odd behaviour at times when using CAT control
with one of my Icom 706MkiiG's.When switching between 50 Mhz and 144
and 432 Mhz,
be reasonable, excessive or inadequate ? (I realize in addition to
any frequency drift from my equipment the drift from the radio at the other end
of the link and any Doppler shift introduced by the propagation mode will also
be relevant.)
Thanks in advance for any comments.
73
Mark Spencer
drilling into email delivery and search issues to this address is low on my to
do list.)
I don't want to take up more list bandwidth going forwards. Thanks to you
and the rest of the team for your efforts.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
>> On Nov 19, 2018, at 4:28 PM, J
.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Nov 17, 2018, at 3:08 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> While running FT8 I have noticed that the setting of the Auto Seq
> radio button is not sticky after the program has been restarted. If I
> enable Auto Seq, th
Hi:
While running FT8 I have noticed that the setting of the Auto Seq
radio button is not sticky after the program has been restarted. If I
enable Auto Seq, then exit WSJT-X and re start WSJT-X Auto Seq is not
enabled.
Not a huge issue but thought I would mention it.
Other than that, at first
to keep
transmitting.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 10:40 AM, WB5JJJ wrote:
>
> This 5 minute mouse timeout is not a problem for me (most of the time) as my
> WD timer is usually set for 5 minutes. But occasionally the mouse timer hits
> befo
could do some more testing (ie with a radio with a
built in "sound card" interface, and / or other versions of WSJT-x.) I don't
recall ever having this issue in the past, but have never explicitly looked for
it either.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...
While running JT65B
Selecting:
"View"
"Message averaging"
Results in the:
"WSJT-X Contest Log"
Dialog box being displayed
Running on a Windows 7 PC
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
___
wsjt
s.
(My self and two other stations also experienced some "odd issues" and if I can
either work out how to replicate them or clearly explain them I will pass them
onto the list.)
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Oct 21, 2018, at 11:33 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
>
e to TX5 even though the message wasn't directed to
me. I was also prompted to log the QSO (even though the QSO wasn't complete.).
Is this normal ?
Thanks
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.s
Hi:
Over two hours after an un successful MSK144 attempt with KE0LLH on 144
Mhz, this decode showed up on my screen.
040445 -8 2.4 1704 & R+03
Normally I wouldn't pay much attention to this but in this case I had
decode set to "Normal" (rather than "Deep".) The other station had
previously
from CN89.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 10:57 AM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> I have switched my home VHF station over to the latest RC version of WSJT-X.
> I am hoping to be able to test the NA VHF contest and rover functionally ov
couldn't run MSK144 on most
of the HF bands (with the exception of 30M and possibly 60M ?) if I could find
some one to run with.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 5:40 PM, K5GZR - Rick wrote:
>
> Joe,
> Thanks for the quick response.
> I did lea
and feeding spots to the PSK reporter.
Ideally I'd like to test the NA VHF contesting and rover functionality on VHF
but I can't see any reason why testing on HF wouldn't work as a plan B ?
For the time being I have set my call to VE7AFZ/R and turned on NA VHF Contest
mode.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
Sorry re my last message.. I shold also have mentioned the Deep and AP
decode options were also selected.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 4:05 PM Mark Spencer wrote:
> Saw the following two decodes on the screen.
>
> 222645 -24 1.9 3254 ~ BZ0KJH RG3YPR/P RR17
>
> 2234
Saw the following two decodes on the screen.
222645 -24 1.9 3254 ~ BZ0KJH RG3YPR/P RR17
223415 -16 0.6 2304 ~ TU; 2D2AGX GZ3IZJ 569 5554
I'm inclined to ignore the decode from 222645, but the subsequent decode at
223415 seems reasonable in terms of, S/N ratio, timing, and audio
frequency, yet
Thanks Ryan. I appreciate you answering my question (and thanks for the QSO.)
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Sep 30, 2018, at 7:18 PM, Ryan Quagliata wrote:
>
> Hi, my name is Ryan I'm AA7AO.
>
> I went in to file, settings, general tab and actually
Hi: Earlier today I was able to complete a random QSO with AA7AO/SOTA who
was calling CQ on 14.078 I was using FT8 in 77 bit mode.
I'm just curious how this call was sent ? Not a huge issue by any means.
Thanks for the bandwidth (:
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
Hi:
Running FT8 on 7.078. Both the always generate 77 bit messages and the
the Only decode 77 bit messages dialog boxes were selected. Neither Fox
nor Hound mode was enablled. Using a lenovo lapton running windows 10.
Finished a QSO with WY4D,
Then decoded a CQ from WY4D
Immediately after
Hi:
Left my computer / radio monitoring 7.078 FT8. Both the always generate 77
bit messages and the the Only decode 77 bit messages dialog boxes were
selected.
Came back to the computer and observed the folloing error indication:
*Subprocess Error*
*Subprocess failed with exit code 2*
To recap things began working again when I double clicked on a CQ message (as
opposed to calling CQ my self.)
Subsequently I was able to call CQ and another station responded to my CQ
message.
I have been unable to reproduce the error.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On
sues noted.
Please advise if more info is needed.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
I also saw CQ RU RU N5YH
at 020945
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Sep 26, 2018, at 7:25 PM, August Treubig wrote:
>
> Take the RU out. It gets automatically generated.Like you have it, no
> one can respond
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Sep
e're waiting to hear from you about the "/R" (rover)
> capabilities in WSJT-X 2.0. This facility is there because you (and others)
> asked for it. We would appreciate your feedback.
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
>> On 9/26/2018 12:25 PM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>> Hi:
&g
e stations were reporting to PSK reporter. Managed
to make two extra contacts by using FT8 including a CN93 to CN89 contact that I
suspect wouldn't have been possible with SSB/CW.)
I hope this is of some interest to at least a few people (:
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...
If anyone in or around the Pacific North West wants to try the VHF contesting
related features prior to the next contest let me know. I have a reasonably
good path into the metro Seattle area and beyond on 144 MHz from my home QTH in
greater Vancouver.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn
ot;DT" reports of .5 of a
second or more.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Aug 4, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Claude Frantz
> wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2018 04:45 PM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
>
> Hi Uwe, Mike & All,
>
>> when you are operating portable from fieldd
should typically be able to deal with this type
of issue but I can see some one who perhaps paying a lot of attention or had a
built in meter set to say SWR (as opposed to power out or ALC) getting tripped
up by this.
I don't have these types of issue with my IC7300.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
Same here. Schedule permitting I'd be happy to help test if needed.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Gary Rogers wrote:
>
> Schedule permitting, happy to be one of the testers. 73 KO3F
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jul 26
Thank you Joe. This is great news. I apreciate the effort by the team.
I look forwards to being able to try out the new software in due course.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Mike and all,
>
> On 7/23/2018 7:37 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>
>>
SJT-x team for their efforts.
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 9:51 AM, Mark Spencer wrote:
>
> I'd support using an extra FT8 bit to explicitly indicate contest mode (using
> another extra bit to explicitly indicate a "/R" call wou
quot;extra bits" that FT8 has) but in
practice I don't believe MSK144 has nearly as many contest mode / vs non
contest mode issues.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 9:38 AM, wrote:
>
> I also was more than a bit frustrated with the contest mo
That approach seemed to work for me.
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel
> wrote:
>
> So let's change the double-click on the Band Activity and tell them that
> rather than processing it.
> "You mu
Perfect. Thanks
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Bill Somerville
wrote:
> On 03/07/2018 23:46, Mark Spencer wrote:
>
> While running in Hound mode, if I manually enter a frequency into the into
> the frequency dialog box (above the RX level indicator) the program
Hi:
Thanks again for a great program.
While running in Hound mode, if I manually enter a frequency into the into
the frequency dialog box (above the RX level indicator) the program enables
TX mode (as soon as I press the enter key.) If I disable Hound mode, this
behavior disappears. The radio
s. The free message function along with the power
slider meets my needs. To recap the "free message" function doesn't seem to be
available in hound mode.
Not a big issue but I thought I would mention this for future consideration.
73 and thanks again
Mark S
VE7AFZ
Mark Spen
Yes I am aware of the tune button. My comment concerns sending my call sign
for station ID purposes.
Thanks
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 11:13 AM, August Treubig wrote:
>
> There is a Tune button on the far right
>
> Sent from my iPad
sage being
sent.
(The free message option is not available in "message set number 1")
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
.
According to a brochure I found on the Internet the 7700 has a CI-V port but I
haven't looked at the manual re this.
73 and good luck.
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jul 3, 2018, at 7:16 AM, John Zantek wrote:
>
> You would think it’s that simple, but no. Icom’s requi
I've been watching them (KH1/KH7Z) work various stations on 14 Mhz for the
last 30 Minutes or so. I have yet to see a single CQ from them.
73
Mark S
VE7AFZ
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Bill Turner via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I have seen kh7z answering
ffice much on my ham radio laptops hence I use
older versions of Office on those PC's.)
73
Mark Spencer
VE7AFZ
netsyn...@gmail.com
> On Jun 23, 2018, at 12:56 AM, DG2YCB, Uwe wrote:
>
> Pat, just a small technical note: Pasting a screenshot taken with "print" in
>
47 matches
Mail list logo
