Sat, 6 Feb 2021 08:11:24 +0200
Saku kirjoitti:
> Yep!
>
> I have also boost-1.69.0-18.fc32.x86_64. Builds fine, but I think
> Jarmo means package install.
Yes
Allways read also the last message in the chain :)
Jarmo
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
I will be running on 1837.5. +2K in next few hours.
vk4tux
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, 4:50 pm John H. Long Jr., wrote:
> Mind if I jump in here also?
>
> Just trying to setup FST4 tonight for the first time.
>
> Please also let me know when one of you are trying FST4 on 160 as I would
> like to see
Mind if I jump in here also?Just trying to setup FST4 tonight for the first time.Please also let me know when one of you are trying FST4 on 160 as I would like to see if I am set up correctly and receiving FST4 messages.Thanks,JohnKW7AUtah, USAJohn H. Long Jr.KW7A1370 N 150ENephi, Utah 84648USA
Yep!
I have also boost-1.69.0-18.fc32.x86_64. Builds fine, but I think Jarmo
means package install.
Jeff Stillinger via wsjt-devel kirjoitti 6.2.2021 klo 4.12:
Using Boost 1.66 on SuSE Enterprise. Works just fine, builds without
error.
On 2/5/21 5:36 AM, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed
On 2/5/2021 6:03 PM, k...@earthlink.net wrote:
Hi, Jim:
What frequency are you using FST4 on 160m?
I'm using a dial frequency of 1837.5 and offset of about 2.4 kHz, which
puts TX/RX just below FT8. I'm using that dial frequency so that big FT8
signals don't limit the dynamic range of the
Using Boost 1.66 on SuSE Enterprise. Works just fine, builds without
error.
On 2/5/21 5:36 AM, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
there is BOOST 1.69.
So anyone solved this?
Jarmo, oh1mrr
Hi, Jim:
What frequency are you using FST4 on 160m?
Thanks,
Ron, K6XC
> On Feb 5, 2021, at 1:48 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>
> On 2/5/2021 12:34 PM, Marco Calistri wrote:
>> No, as I wrote I don't oper on V-U-SHF, nor on LF/VLF, I'am a FT8/FT4 HF
>> only user
>
> Do you work 160M? FST4 with
Il 05/02/21 18:48, Jim Brown ha
scritto:
On
2/5/2021 12:34 PM, Marco Calistri wrote:
No, as I wrote I don't oper on V-U-SHF,
nor on LF/VLF, I'am a FT8/FT4 HF only user
Do you work 160M? FST4 with long sequence (60
It would be great to access this switch from the main window, making it
easier to switch from multi-decode once a QSO partner is chosen.
73, Jim K9YC
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On 2/5/2021 12:34 PM, Marco Calistri wrote:
No, as I wrote I don't oper on V-U-SHF, nor on LF/VLF, I'am a FT8/FT4
HF only user
Do you work 160M? FST4 with long sequence (60 sec) is a game-changer on
that band, allowing the use of smaller TX antennas and operation with
more local noise on
All
Not sure if this can be fixed/worked around - will depend I suspect on UDP
message content
Testing a 13cm (2320) system - wsjt-x allows me to enter transverter offset so
it knows what to set the rig to.
2320 - offset (of -2174) gives IF of 146 - all OK rig changes freq correctly
as
Tried that. Can't recover the PW to log in.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Zampella [mailto:ne...@techie.com]
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 11:38 AM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] (no subject)
That's not going to work, you have to go to the URL shown at
Hi Hasan,
I appreciated your reply, I know I made a silly consideration on my
previous e-mail.
No, as I wrote I don't oper on V-U-SHF, nor on LF/VLF, I'am a FT8/FT4
HF only user
73's de PY1ZRJ Marco
Il 05/02/21 17:30, Hasan N0AN ha scritto:
Marco,
There are almost always other
Marco,
There are almost always other program enhancements besides new modes, and
for that and bug fixes, you should stay current with the latest Full
Release, you can skip the Release Candidates.
If you work VHF/UHF at all, I would highly recommend you upgrade to 2.4.0
RC1 so you can use Q65 mode
That's not going to work, you have to go to the URL shown at the bottom
of each message.
Neil, KN3ILZ
On 2/5/2021 11:30 AM, John Zantek wrote:
unsub
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Many thanks to everyone.
Thanks for explanation.
Many 73s,
Maurizio
Il 05/02/2021 19:03, Reino Talarmo ha scritto:
Hi Maurizio
See User Guide section 12.2.
Location of this AP info seems to be in a new position.
73, Reino OH3mA
*From:*Maurizio Brameri
https://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/k1jt/wsjtx-doc/wsjtx-main-2.3.0_en.html#_ap_decoding
73,
-Jim
NU0C
On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:58:46 +0100
Maurizio Brameri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some more investigation, I noted that it happens always when a
> station is calling CQ and it is decoded as
Hi Maurizio
See User Guide section 12.2.
Location of this AP info seems to be in a new position.
73, Reino OH3mA
From: Maurizio Brameri [mailto:maurizio.bram...@fastwebnet.it]
Sent: 5. helmikuuta 2021 19:51
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] version 2.3.0 x64 GA
Hi,
after some more investigation, I noted that it happens always when a
station is calling CQ and it is decoded as last station at last decode
try. In my configuration the decode button is lighting 3 times.
I hope I can explain clearly wht is happening.
73,
Maurizio I2NOY
Il 05/02/2021
unsub
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
This is showed when the app displays the second decode try.
It is not always but random.
Il 05/02/2021 18:46, Maurizio Brameri ha scritto:
Hi,
this evening I noted that sometimes an "al" is anteposed to country name.
Please see pasted image:
Is seems it happens on last station received.
Hi,
this evening I noted that sometimes an "al" is anteposed to country name.
Please see pasted image:
Is seems it happens on last station received.
Is it a bug or it indicates something?
73,
Maurizio I2NOY
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 14:24:27 +
g3vnc kirjoitti:
> On Linux Mint 19.3 I did $ sudo apt install libboost-all-dev as per
> the 2.3.0 User Guide and built 2.3.0 from source with no issues.
>
> The libboost-all-dev version that was installed from the repo is
> 1.65.1.0ubuntu1.
>
> Am I missing
On 05/02/2021 11:36, jarmo wrote:
Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
there is BOOST 1.69.
So anyone solved this?
Jarmo, oh1mrr
On Linux Mint 19.3 I did $ sudo apt install libboost-all-dev as per the
2.3.0 User Guide and built 2.3.0
Fri, 5 Feb 2021 07:19:40 -0600
Richard Shaw kirjoitti:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61383470
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> KF5OIM
Tnx Richard
Jarmo
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:43 AM jarmo wrote:
> Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
> 2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
> there is BOOST 1.69.
> So anyone solved this?
>
I just kicked off the official Fedora build. I was working on the hamlib
4.1 release earlier.
Has anyone managed install version 2.3.0 into F32?
2.3.0 has depencies to BOOST 1.73 and in F32
there is BOOST 1.69.
So anyone solved this?
Jarmo, oh1mrr
___
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Jim,
Did you deleted soundcard as Bill proposed?
If you unplug your sound card, what happens at “Device management” (hope that
is the English name, I got only a Finnish version of Windows 7)? Is then your
soundcard removed from “Sound, Video and Game driver” list when re-plugging
soundcard,
28 matches
Mail list logo
