Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-10 Thread Chris McMahon
On 5/10/07, Walter Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am very keen to have this done, but leeching isn't nice and I can't write C. If there is forward movement on win32guitest, I volunteer to do a document for it, either a user guide, or something in the style of this:

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-09 Thread Bret Pettichord
Thanks for your detailed replies. Comments inline. Christopher Rasch wrote: Well, ultimately, I want to be able to handle any popup that the browser throws up: attach to it, manipulate it, etc. My understanding is that better modal dialog support is one of the new features of Watir 1.5.

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-09 Thread Bret Pettichord
Christopher Rasch wrote: Both of these tickets relate to improving the existing modal web dialog support (showModalDialog). At this point, I no longer have plans to work on them and no one else has volunteered to work on them. Probably the biggest problem with our current support for

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-09 Thread Paul Rogers
: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir Christopher Rasch wrote: Both of these tickets relate to improving the existing modal web dialog support (showModalDialog). At this point, I no longer have plans to work on them and no one else has volunteered to work on them. Probably the biggest

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-09 Thread Bret Pettichord
Paul Rogers wrote: Id like the winclicker code to disappear and be replaced by a full windows testing library ( How you getting along with that Chris ? ). Enough people seem to want it. I think a lot of people would like to see that. I certainly would. But last i looked Chris's project

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-09 Thread Chris McMahon
On 5/9/07, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul Rogers wrote: Id like the winclicker code to disappear and be replaced by a full windows testing library ( How you getting along with that Chris ? ). Enough people seem to want it. I think a lot of people would like to see that.

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-08 Thread Bret Pettichord
Christopher Rasch wrote: I'm looking forward to ... better support for modal_dialogs on the supported platforms. Nothing is planned in this area. What were you hoping for? Bret ___ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-08 Thread Chris McMahon
Since integration of the various watirs is also part of the roadmap, I expect that some of the better modal dialog support will also be migrated to the other watir flavors. Perhaps I have the wrong impression? I think it's a terminology problem: modal dialog is an artifact of IE only.

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-08 Thread Paul Rogers
PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 8, 2007 3:40 pm Subject: Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir Since integration of the various watirs is also part of the roadmap, I expect that some of the better modal dialog support will also be migrated to the other watir flavors. Perhaps I have the wrong

[Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-04 Thread Bret Pettichord
I've been doing a lot of thinking and planning for what we need to do with Watir. I've also been fairly quiet. I now have a new job and have been preoccupied by the change in jobs lately: with wrapping up affairs at my old job at DataCert, with a job search, and then with starting at Dovetail,

Re: [Wtr-general] The Plan for Watir

2007-05-04 Thread Chris McMahon
Good information. You and Charley and maybe some others should put this in blogs so the wider world can find it. On 5/4/07, Bret Pettichord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been doing a lot of thinking and planning for what we need to do with Watir. I've also been fairly quiet. I now have a new