On 09/20/2013 04:44 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
So, I hereby propose we give up on all this until after we solve the
change-over-time problem for RDF.
Well, I do have other things to do in my life
Sorry Hopefully you at least
On 24 September 2013 14:31, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
On 09/20/2013 04:44 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:52 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
So, I hereby propose we give up on all this until after we solve the
change-over-time problem for RDF.
Well, I do have other
On 09/24/2013 09:38 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
Do you have a use case (involving RDF on computers) for having different
properties on different graphs (which happen to have the same triples),
and which does not involve graphs changing over time?
(jumping in here...)
Related to change over time,
On 24 September 2013 14:51, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:38 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
Do you have a use case (involving RDF on computers) for having different
properties on different graphs (which happen to have the same
triples),
and which does not involve graphs
On 09/24/2013 09:53 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
On 24 September 2013 14:51, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
On 09/24/2013 09:38 AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
Do you have a use case (involving RDF on computers) for having different
properties on different graphs (which happen to have the same
triples),
On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
I'm now confident that you and I (and Jeremy) agree the problem we're trying
to solve in this thread is this: people seem to want to have different
properties on one graph than on another, even when the graphs happen to
have
On 09/24/2013 01:07 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
On Sep 24, 2013, at 6:31 AM, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org
mailto:san...@w3.org wrote:
I'm now confident that you and I (and Jeremy) agree the problem we're
trying to solve in this thread is this: people seem to want to have
different properties
On 24 September 2013 19:15, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
So let's go back to that.Give me an example that shows three things: the
triples happen to be the same, the metadata must remain distinct, and there
is no change over time.As I think about it now, I'm beginning to think
Daniel,
Thanks. You have started a great thread. Nearly 50 thoughtful posts
looking to address your issue and looking at the problem from all angles.
I don't want to stop the discussion, so I hope people continue to post.
But I did want to share that the AB took up this topic at its
On 09/24/2013 05:32 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
On 24 September 2013 19:15, Sandro Hawke san...@w3.org wrote:
So let's go back to that.Give me an example that shows three things: the
triples happen to be the same, the metadata must remain distinct, and there
is no change over time.As I
10 matches
Mail list logo