The pattern given for CURIE in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-curie-20101216 is ineffective for
validation since it matches anything but an empty string. That is to say
(([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:)?.+ is no different than .+ alone. An alternative
would be (([\i-[:]][\c-[:]]*)?:).+|([^:])+ which
I recommend you look at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-core - there is a
better pattern for CURIE in there. It is the current best definition of
CURIE.
On 5/9/2012 10:25 PM, Brian M. Ames wrote:
The pattern given for CURIE in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-curie-20101216 is ineffective for
