Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: wxLua for wxMac

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
John Labenski wrote: Will recompile wxLua with full debugging symbols enabled tomorrow, I think. That would be great, sorry but I can't help without some more information. I can't imagine what could fail in wxLuaEditorApp::OnInit, but a line number would help! Here you go then: Program

Re: [Wxlua-users] Release today?

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi wrote: Hi, if everyone agree, we could proceed today with release 2.6.2.0, as expected... Autopackage stuff and mac bundle could be not fully ready but they can be added later. If proceeding with release, I'll package wxLua this afternoon and then upload it to SF

[Wxlua-users] Re: Release today?

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
k. holwerda ha scritto: Hi Francesco, Last time i tested MSW all looked fine, that was a few days ago. Next desaster struck my notebook with all mail etc., it overheated and broke down. So i have bin bussy trying to get my data back from its harddisk :-( bad news... having had so many

[Wxlua-users] Re: Release today?

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: Francesco Montorsi wrote: Hi, if everyone agree, we could proceed today with release 2.6.2.0, as expected... Autopackage stuff and mac bundle could be not fully ready but they can be added later. If proceeding with release, I'll package wxLua this

[Wxlua-users] Re: wxMac - packaging details

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: Francesco Montorsi wrote: So, we just need to add to build\macbundle the Info.plist and maybe a simple script which calls the utilities to actually build the package, isn't it? I can then add Info.plist to configure list of files to create. It won't be used

[Wxlua-users] Re: Release today?

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi ha scritto: k. holwerda ha scritto: Hi Francesco, Last time i tested MSW all looked fine, that was a few days ago. Next desaster struck my notebook with all mail etc., it overheated and broke down. So i have bin bussy trying to get my data back from its harddisk :-( bad

[Wxlua-users] Re: Release today?

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
I've done various compile tests on wxMSW, wxGTK. Everything should be working there. I'm now testing through SF compile farm the AMD64 builds (but first I need to get wx built there and it will take long...) Now I'll study some electronics (my university exams are coming closer and closer!)

[Wxlua-users] 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Hi, finally I've tagged the wxLua tree and created all binary and source packages, updated download page and created a news entry. Unfortunately it seems I don't have file-release permissions on SF and thus even if I already uploaded the files to upload.sf.net I cannot bind them with a

[Wxlua-users] configure and CXXFLAGS

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
How do I get configure to respect the CXXFLAGS ? Seems that it just replaces them with -g0 -O2 ? (and whatever wx-config --cxxflags add, of course) --anders --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language

Re: [Wxlua-users] 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread John Labenski
On 3/10/06, Francesco Montorsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, finally I've tagged the wxLua tree and created all binary and source packages, updated download page and created a news entry. Unfortunately it seems I don't have file-release permissions on SF and thus even if I already

Re: [Wxlua-users] 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
John Labenski wrote: could someone give me rights shortly (after some hours uploaded files are removed if not binded) or bind the files with a wxLua release? Ok, all done. I get an empty (0-byte) file, for wxlua-2.6.2.0.tar.gz ? --anders

[Wxlua-users] Why does wxLua install lua too ?

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Was a bit surprised, when my new Lua 5.1 was overwritten by the old Lua 5.0.2 from wxLua... Is there any reason why it installs lua too ? (I only expected it to install the wxlua ones) --anders --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a

[Wxlua-users] Re: configure and CXXFLAGS

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: How do I get configure to respect the CXXFLAGS ? Seems that it just replaces them with -g0 -O2 ? (and whatever wx-config --cxxflags add, of course) arg, this seems to be a little problem which I never spotted. It should be fixed now... Francesco

[Wxlua-users] Re: 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: John Labenski wrote: could someone give me rights shortly (after some hours uploaded files are removed if not binded) or bind the files with a wxLua release? Ok, all done. I get an empty (0-byte) file, for wxlua-2.6.2.0.tar.gz ? I'm still testing all

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: Why does wxLua install lua too ?

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi wrote: well, wxLua embeds lua so I thought it was natural to install it. It should probably be installed under another name, though ? Otherwise it *will* cause conflicts. The lua library installed won't create any conflict since it's named something like:

Re: [Wxlua-users] 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi wrote: finally I've tagged the wxLua tree and created all binary and source packages, updated download page and created a news entry. Just for fun, I tried downloading the .package file and installing it. (following the instructions linked to from the download

[Wxlua-users] Re: Why does wxLua install lua too ?

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: Francesco Montorsi wrote: well, wxLua embeds lua so I thought it was natural to install it. It should probably be installed under another name, though ? Otherwise it *will* cause conflicts. The lua library installed won't create any conflict since it's named

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: Why does wxLua install lua too ?

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi wrote: You might want to do the same thing for the include dir, too... ? the headers should not cause any conflict since they go in $PREFIX/include/lua/include (note the double include string in path - required for wxLua moduling system). IIRC correctly lua puts its

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: Why does wxLua install lua too ?

2006-03-10 Thread John Labenski
On 3/10/06, Anders F Björklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Francesco Montorsi wrote: You might want to do the same thing for the include dir, too... ? the headers should not cause any conflict since they go in $PREFIX/include/lua/include (note the double include string in path - required

[Wxlua-users] Re: 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Francesco Montorsi
Anders F Björklund ha scritto: Francesco Montorsi wrote: finally I've tagged the wxLua tree and created all binary and source packages, updated download page and created a news entry. Just for fun, I tried downloading the .package file and installing it. (following the instructions linked

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: wxLua for wxMac

2006-03-10 Thread John Labenski
On 3/10/06, Anders F Björklund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Labenski wrote: Will recompile wxLua with full debugging symbols enabled tomorrow, I think. That would be great, sorry but I can't help without some more information. I can't imagine what could fail in

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: 2.6.2.0 packaged but...

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi: I've tried to link statically also expat but in the final ELF ldd still shows expat.so.1 is needed. Probably because wxWidgets was not compiled using autopackage's gcc wrapper, apgcc, which cuts down dependencies... I'm going to create an autopackage for wxWidgets but

[Wxlua-users] RPM spec for wxLua

2006-03-10 Thread Anders F Björklund
As mentioned earlier, all that needs to be done to support RPM building is to put a spec file into a build/rpm directory... Here is such a file, that I just wrote: http://www.algonet.se/~afb/wx/wxlua.spec (builds with: rpmbuild -ba wxlua.spec) Should be straight-forward to convert Version: into