Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: RPM spec for wxLua

2006-03-13 Thread Anders F Björklund
Francesco Montorsi wrote: Should be straight-forward to convert Version: into a configurable value, and put it into build/rpm/wxlua.spec.in ? yes, sure; I'll do it. And once it works, we can lose the Mac-patch part that is currently included in the spec in 2 places: Patch:

[Wxlua-users] Re: wxLua as a 5.1 binary module

2006-03-13 Thread thegeek
So far I've been able to upgrade wxLua to lua 5.1, works great except for some of the wxlua lua-code, which does ofcourse use table.getn and other deprecated functions/syntaxes, but i tested with some of the samples(modified for lua 5.1) and it worked with no problem. So I have all the wxlua

Re: [Wxlua-users] Re: wxLua as a 5.1 binary module

2006-03-13 Thread John Labenski
On 3/13/06, thegeek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So far I've been able to upgrade wxLua to lua 5.1, works great except for some of the wxlua lua-code, which does ofcourse use table.getn and other deprecated functions/syntaxes, but i tested with some of the samples(modified for lua 5.1) and it