On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:27:21 -0700
Thomas Kluyver tak...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013 6:17 AM, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:05:08 +0100
Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:57:51 +
Simon McVittie simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 at 21:16:49 -0500, Charles Suprin wrote:
Since no-one else has brought this up, there are portability
considerations. There are colons in Windows paths. The ever famous
c:\. Also
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:01:18 -0500
Trans transf...@gmail.com wrote:
Probably the most useful thing to me about the XDG based directories
are the HOME directories which offer a good solution to cleansing out
home directories of the overwhelming quantity of .dot files.
Unfortunately, adoption
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:18:16 +0200
Niels Ole Salscheider niels_...@salscheider-online.de wrote:
Hello,
I would like to propose to distinguish between machine specific and
machine independent config files for the next basedir-spec. So
machine dependent config files could be stored in e. g.
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:30:12 -0500
Rodney Dawes dobey.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:17 +0100, Wolfram Kleff wrote:
Request for Comments/Standards update suggestion:
I would like to suggest a .log directory in the $HOME directory
like the .cache directory.
The .log
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:34:38 +0100
Kevin Krammer kevin.kram...@gmx.at wrote:
On Friday, 2009-12-25, Bernd wrote:
Hello,
I reported an issue on the TV-Browser issue tracker to respect the
freedesktop basedir specification:
http://tvbrowser.org:8080/jira/browse/TVB-721
But they
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 22:17:43 +0100
Axel Liljencrantz liljencra...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/4 Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be
...
Imho that would fall in the config section, because the user
configured the variables explicitly. Note that state vs config is
not about persistent vs
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:59:02 +0100
Axel Liljencrantz liljencra...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/2 Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be
It's always hard to define those things in words, but I think the
wordings @
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2009-February/010191.html
are quite
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 02:10:33 +0200
Guillem Jover guil...@hadrons.org wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 22:10:25 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
I see your points and they make sense. I think the real issue is no
longer is it configuration or not, but rather is it configuration
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:53 PM, David Faure dfa...@trolltech.com wrote:
I think we agree, but we both sent ambiguous enough emails to misunderstand
each other :-)
You are of course 100% right. I misread the quotes in earlier emails
and thought you were one to
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 22:09 +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hi all,
at http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-0.6.html
it is explained that $XDG_DATA_{HOME,DIRS} is for (user specific) data
files and $XDG_CONFIG_{HOME,DIRS} for (user specific
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
Generally, $HOME/bin/`arch` for binaries, or $HOME/lib/`arch`...
It can get tricky for things like GIMP plugins.
Yes, but who actually *does* this? As much as it would be nice if
everyone did, it's rare for an app to consider multi-arch on the same
filesystem.
Hi all,
I really like the idea the idea of having 'well-known user folders'
specified like discussed on this list.
I see some distributions (well, at least ubuntu) implement this already.
(the ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs is supposed to be sourced/parsed by
applications right, so the variables
13 matches
Mail list logo
