Philippe Gerum wrote:
Steven Seeger wrote:
Again, the only way to make your point here would be to run the
latency test
in user-space, disabling the periodic timing at configuration level
(v2.1 only),
and making sure that no SMI source is active. If the results
actually show
performance
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Im having trouble with built/installed xenomai,
soekris:/usr/realtime/2.6.13-ski7-v1# insmod
testsuite/klatency/latency_rt.ko
latency_rt: disagrees about version of symbol rt_task_delete
latency_rt: Unknown symbol rt_task_delete
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hallo,
I've been using rtai until now and decided to give xenomai (release 2.1) a
try. I followed the instructions from README.INSTALL, and everything (kernel
patching, compilation, etc.) went fine. Then I tried to run the latency test,
which failed:
---
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 21:00, you wrote:
I saw a similar error when using --enable-x86-sep and not having NPTL
enabled in glibc.
Try configuring without --enable-x86-sep (used in the README.INSTALL
Pentium x86
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jim Cromie wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Tobias Marschall wrote:
Hello,
On Thursday 13 April 2006 21:00, you wrote:
I saw a similar error when using --enable-x86-sep and not
having NPTL
enabled in glibc.
Try configuring without --enable-x86-sep
Saul wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested in hearing from people about the PC's that you use
that are known to work well with Xenomai. I'd be looking for a fast new
desktop PC for image processing and aircraft control tasks. Is AMD a
better bet?
Any suggestions much appreciated.
Saul.
Can
Sean McGranaghan wrote:
Hello all,
I am configuring a new PC for Xenomai 2.1 with a 2.6.16 kernel. In the
past I have always used a vanilla kernel in the default configuration.
I was wondering what features are recommended to enable or disable in
the default kernel configuration? For example
Prashanti Bedapudi wrote:
Attached is a piece of code using alarms, but I am seeing some unexpected
behavior. Any help will be appreciated.
have a look at src/testsuite/latency
it does what I believe youre seeking to do (tho I havent read your code)
in function main() the program
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# modprobe xeno_switchtest
[ 160.221018] Xenomai: starting RTDM services.
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest#
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# switch -n
soekris:/usr/xenomai/testsuite/switchtest# switch rtk0
cpu 0: 498
cpu 0: 998
cpu 0:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know the actual state of the LinuxTraceTool respectively
the ngLtt ?
Is it applicable for Xenomai (I know, that the tracepoints are already
supported by Xenomai).
Or even better, is anybody already using ngLtt with Xenomai.
Thank you for your information
12 matches
Mail list logo
