gt; > K
> >
> >> You should use the pdfx package and prepare for PDF/A-2b or -2u.
> >> This fixes many of these things that affect conversions, as well as
> Accessibility and Archivability.
> >>
> >> It's not fully tagged PDF, but handles many other technical issues.
> >>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Ross
>
>
--
Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com
On Tuesday, 21 June 2016, Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> otfinfo --scripts font-file.otf
... unless the font is using the DFLT script
--
Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List in
or:
>
> \font\x = "MyFont:Ligatures=Common;Ligatures=Rare;Ligatures=Historical"
>
> To work around this, I _think_ it also lets you specify features by ID
(like for OpenType fonts), so you should be able to do
>
> \font\x = "Padauk:+ulon"
>
>
--
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
--
Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Simon,
On 23 February 2016 at 14:12, Simon Cozens <si...@simon-cozens.org> wrote:
> On 23/02/2016 13:54, Andrew Cunningham wrote:
> > PDF/UA for instance leaves the question deliberately ambigious.
> > ActualText is the way to make the content accessible, but develope
to PDFs that
doesn't suffer the same problems as PDF documents.
Andrew
--
Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
will
>>> need to check out and build the code from there. After some time, if no
>>> major problems show up, I expect to merge it to the master branch, and then
>>> to the TeXLive source tree.
>>>
>>> Feedback welcome..
>>>
>>> JK
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
>
>
>
> --
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
>
--
Andrew Cunningham
lang.supp...@gmail.com
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
It would probably more than double, i was under the impression that
ActualText was a tag attrubute, so extensive tagging would be needed, and
actual text added to the tags.
But the question is how to practically make use of ActualText if there is a
visible text layer.
PDF/UA for instance leaves
Although personaly I'd consider such a solution a poor hack compared to a
well designed font that is fit for purpose.
Andrew
On 13/03/2014 10:51 AM, maxwell maxw...@umiacs.umd.edu wrote:
On 2014-03-12 14:47, Joshua and Amy wrote:
I'm typesetting with XeLaTeX, using fontspec, and calling a
8
On 11/12/2013 5:27 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@cscott.net wrote:
..which is indeed the issue I am attempting to deal with (trying to
put the discussion back on track) -- a bunch of user authored content
which looks correct to a native speaker when using the unicode bidi
algorithm
the
language tags to the article titles.
Hope this helps
regards
Keith.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Andrew Cunningham
Project Manager, Research
Is there documentation available that lists which zcripfs are supportsd, or
is it a case of just testing to se if various scripts work?
On 17/06/2013 8:28 AM, Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
You should write Script=Telugu with capital T in your font declaration.
2013/6/16 Jamal
On 03/06/2013 1:24 AM, BPJ b...@melroch.se wrote:
Sure, but you also need to find fonts which contain the characters you
need!
Very true.
But usually I've found that combining diacritic support isn't the
limitation, its acfually finding the necessary base characters and glyph
combinations I
Ir is still better to use fonts that have properly designed diacritics than
rely on a hack for diacritic placement jn fonts that weren't designed for
it.
On 02/06/2013 3:49 AM, Dominik Wujastyk wujas...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes dreams come true :-)
This is the nature of the PDF format. It is a preprint format the focuses
on glyphs rather than characters
It partly depends on the font, and the OT features being used.
In theory you can have ActualText in the PDF, but once you move to complex
scripts all bets are off. Without a complete
/
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Andrew Cunningham
Project Manager, Research and Development
Social and Digital Inclusion Unit
Public Libraries and Community Engagement
State Library of Victoria
328 Swanston Street
Melbourne
hard, and perhaps impossible, for her to do
the same in Unicode.
** Phil.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Andrew Cunningham
Senior Project Manager, Research and Development
Vicnet
/texlive/2011/texmf-dist/fonts/misc/xetex/fontmapping
there are some mapping examples that you can see.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Andrew Cunningham
Senior Project Manager
.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
Andrew Cunningham
Senior Project Manager, Research and Development
Vicnet
State Library of Victoria
19 matches
Mail list logo
