CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/11/04 18:56:28
Log message:
209. Add an example for setting the repeat rate to the xset(1) man page
(Bugzilla #1506, David Dawes, suggested by Alan Iwi).
Modified files:
eManager Notification *
The following message was blocked because it contains sensitive content.
Source mailbox: @ºë³e°ê»Ú»{ÃÒ¤¤¤ß
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rule/Policy: Trend Micro Anti-spam
Action: Quarantine to C:\Program
I need to get rid of the cursor from the Xserver.
There are a number of X client programs on screen and
I cannot modify all of them to hide the cursor. What I want
is a way to globally hide the cursor.
Is there a configuration option to get rid of the cursor?
Can I change the cursor to a total
Cheap hack warning!.
Creat a cursor glyph that is all nil and load it in... Not
sure how well it will work but might just do the trick.
You can test with xsetroot -cursor.
JC
Barry Scott wrote:
I need to get rid of the cursor from the Xserver.
There are a number of X client programs
On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Barry Scott wrote:
I need to get rid of the cursor from the Xserver.
There are a number of X client programs on screen and
I cannot modify all of them to hide the cursor. What I want
is a way to globally hide the cursor.
Is there a configuration option to get rid of the
Barry Scott wrote:
I need to get rid of the cursor from the Xserver.
There are a number of X client programs on screen and
I cannot modify all of them to hide the cursor. What I want
is a way to globally hide the cursor.
If you have a number of programs on the screen, why would you want to
Tim Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Barry Scott wrote:
I need to get rid of the cursor from the Xserver.
There are a number of X client programs on screen and
I cannot modify all of them to hide the cursor. What I want
is a way to globally hide the cursor.
If you have a number of programs
tkank you for your suggestion.
as i'm a newer using LINUX, i'need unfortunatly using this vesion of linux,
this paltform correspond to install ns simulator without bugs, this is why i
prefer work under.
now , please can you help to find the adequat driver to have this grafic
interface, my monitor
I was under the impression that only NVIDIA's binary drivers
supported GLX 1.3 and pbuffers.
Mark.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
Hello,
It appears to me in principle the xfree86 implementation of GLX is up to
1.3 and supports pbuffers. However, I
I asked this question before without any response, so am trying
again.
I'm newly installing (cross install) Linux debian sarge. When I do
startx for root, the X system crashes. Here is the relevant section of
the log:
cut ===
...
(==) Log file:
Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I was under the impression that only NVIDIA's binary drivers
supported GLX 1.3 and pbuffers.
It's a good question. I have the ATI proprietary driver and glxinfo says
the client GLX is version 1.3, but the server is still xfree86 and
version 1.2. I have no idea what this
I wrote up a shell script that takes read-edid and creates an Xconfig
file on the fly. Basically I took my xconfig script and copied
everything above the Monitor section to one file, and everything below
the Monitor section to another file. Then I parsed the output of
read-edid-1.4.1 (from
Hi there,
I have copied the log fom /var/log/XFree86.0.log
and and forward it to you so please help me
I have moved my hard-drive into a different box,
and the box, so when I powered it up it came up with that error
message
XFree86 Version
4.2.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.2.0-72) / X
On Friday 05 November 2004 14:37, Vaa Alauni wrote:
Hi there,
I have copied the log fom /var/log/XFree86.0.log and and forward it to you
so please help me I have moved my hard-drive into a different box, and the
box, so when I powered it up it came up with that error message
I am not an
Hi again,
Here is Alicia Engle. I write to you because we are accepting your mortgag=
e application.
Our office confirms you can get a $220.000 lo=C0n for a $252.00 per month =
payment.
Approval process will take 1 minute, so please fill out the form on our we=
bsite:
Thanks for the response. I'm new to XFree86. Could you give me a bit of
background as to why you think this is the case?
There's some graphics software being ported from SGIs to Linux and this is
apparently a problem. Is there a workaround?
Thanks again in advance
- Original Message -
16 matches
Mail list logo