Re: [XFree86] Re: Have you dropped radeon 7200 support?

2003-01-29 Thread Wayne Whitney
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, tsi wrote: On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, hy0 wrote: Anyway, back to this patch, why does it have to set MEM_CNTL to 0? If you simply comment off OUTREG(RADEON_MEM_CNTL, 0) in PreInt10Save, will the patch still work for your special cases? It's interesting how these special

Re: [XFree86] Re: Have you dropped radeon 7200 support?

2003-01-29 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Wayne Whitney wrote: Anyway, back to this patch, why does it have to set MEM_CNTL to 0? If you simply comment off OUTREG(RADEON_MEM_CNTL, 0) in PreInt10Save, will the patch still work for your special cases? It's interesting how these special cases out-number the

Re: [XFree86] Re: Have you dropped radeon 7200 support?

2003-01-28 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, hy0 wrote: It's interesting how these special cases out-number the single more common case of not having to re-POST the adapter... I agree the re-POST bug could be quite common for secondary card, since BIOS code itself may not be well designed/tested to run under such

Re: [XFree86] Re: Have you dropped radeon 7200 support?

2003-01-27 Thread hy0
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, hy0 wrote: Thanks for the explanations, now I can see what this is about. However I still have some concerns about this code. Indeed, Radeon chips do have 0x1c0 (misnamed MPP_TB_CONFIG) as SEPROM_CNTL register. Modifying/restoring its SCK_PRESCALE field