Hi,
why the Xmail server uses its own DNS resolution and ignores (probably) =
the
system setting?
I have configuration, where the mail server is expected to route all =
queries
trough one particular DNS. When I setup this DNS in system, I expect =
that
programs would use it. In XMail, I must
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
why the Xmail server uses its own DNS resolution and ignores (probably) =
the
system setting?
I have configuration, where the mail server is expected to route all =
queries
trough one particular DNS. When I setup this DNS in system, I
Am Mon, 2003-10-27 um 21.37 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Your is a desperate case ;) IIRC it's MS CRT library that screws up. I did
not receive any other report of bad log files generation and the code
actually does the right thing.
Well - I think this isn't a MS-related feature - till yesterday
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Am Mon, 2003-10-27 um 21.37 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Your is a desperate case ;) IIRC it's MS CRT library that screws up. I did
not receive any other report of bad log files generation and the code
actually does the right thing.
Well - I think
So maybe you go no reports because most of the installed Xmail base is in
the Northern Hemisphere?
You should see some more reports now that your half of the world returns to
'normal' time.
The report by Achim Schmidt is exactly what I have, only he has just started
getting 2300 and I have just
Am Mon, 2003-10-27 um 23.43 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Which version are you running?
You mean xmail?
the installation switching from 00 to 23 is xmail 1.17, compiled with
gcc version 3.3 20030226 (prerelease) (SuSE Linux)
and the other switching from 01 to 00 is xmail 1.10, compiled with
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Rob Arends wrote:
So maybe you go no reports because most of the installed Xmail base is in
the Northern Hemisphere?
You should see some more reports now that your half of the world returns to
'normal' time.
The report by Achim Schmidt is exactly what I have, only he
Am Die, 2003-10-28 um 01.15 schrieb Davide Libenzi:
Do you still have the C test program I sent you to have Achim to run it?
if you mean the one from 21 Jul 2003
#include stdio.h
#include time.h
int main(void) {
tzset();
printf(dl=%d\n, daylight);
printf(tz=%ld\n,
Yep,
The first one you sent:
#include stdio.h
#include time.h
int main(void) {
tzset();
printf (daylight: %d\n, _daylight);
printf (timezone: %ld\n, _timezone);
return 0;
}
The second one you
Achim,
Try this prog, Tracy (I think) sent it to me.
www.arends.com.au/public/TSInfo.cpp
This one does calculate correctly but I think it is Windoze only.
Rob :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Achim Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, October
Thanks Rob,
but as you expected it is windows only :-(
- Achim
Am Die, 2003-10-28 um 01.47 schrieb Rob Arends:
Achim,
Try this prog, Tracy (I think) sent it to me.
www.arends.com.au/public/TSInfo.cpp
This one does calculate correctly but I think it is Windoze only.
Rob :)
On Mon, 28 Oct 2003, Achim Schmidt wrote:
Okay - another try with the 2nd one:
bt6:~ # ./a.out
tz=-3600
dlp=1
dla=0
daffy:~ # ./a.out
tz=-3600
dlp=1
dla=0
My machine looks fine. Obviously the file smail-200310260100 (change
happened such day) get a 0100 but the next
12 matches
Mail list logo
