Any way to get Xmail to use authentication when relaying mail with
smtprelay in mailproc.tab?
--John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the default number of mailer threads in Xmail 1.22 and 1.24?
Didn't see that in the documentation.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
so it is easier
that temporary network problems end up being hidden by its caching.
- Davide
But why should a temporary network problem cause any issue in the first
place, unless that problem is a bad DNS entry? Network connectivity
issues during a DNS query should at most cause a
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, John Kielkopf wrote:
I'm probably missing something here, but falling back to the A record
after timeouts would seem to be the wrong course of action. Couldn't a
temporary connectivity issue caused Xmail to incorrectly fall-back
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Possible it's a dns server problem
Who does xmail response on a timeout after dns query ? Who many retries =
?
And final decision on dns timeout ? A record tries ?
I ask this because, I noticed that dns timeouts are
are the only
other apps).
Francis: You had mentioned you thought it might be connectivity,
however the web client app and the XMail server are running on the
same box...
On 3/21/07, John Kielkopf john@webifi.com wrote:
Davide can correct me if I'm wrong, but the POP3 server shouldn't delete
Things to check:
1) Thoroughly check network connectivity to the mail server from the
problem clients.
2) Any possible file locking conflicts? Is there anything running on
the server, possibly antivirus software, that might be locking the email
in the server's mail directory?
Thought of
issue anyway.
Ivo Smits wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Kielkopf john@webifi.com
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 11:41 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Receiving Mail multiple times
Also, you sent this message the list 4 times. Did you intend this?
I
It's 2F (-17C) now and it'll get down below -5F (-21C) tonight but
that's warm for this time of year, in central Minnesota.
Norbert Doeberlein wrote:
Okay, define cold. ;-)
-12C (11F) is f'ing cold according to my friend in northern Germany. I
still wear short sleeves and a spring
I would.
Davide Libenzi wrote:
How many would appreciate per-RCPT SMTP filter capabilities?
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
I thought it was mainly the transparent proxies in AV software that
choked on null bytes.
The funny thing is, since moving off the windows version of Xmail to
linux, I can't say I've seen this problem come up.
Harald Schneider wrote:
There are some spam mails flying around, which have
Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Sorry to repost, but how nobody answered, I supposed my explanation or my
English wasn't that clear.
I'm using xmail with courier-imap and this is working fine.
I also included spamassassin to filter spams, and this is also working fine.
Now, I would like
Use the -SI command line option.
From: http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
-SI ip[:port]
Bind server to the specified ip address and (optional) port (can be
multiple).
--John
Kay Seljeseth wrote:
We have been running XP and Xmail Server without any problems for a long
for verification, in case I'm wrong.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 12
While I've never used Stunnel for a SSL POP3 client, a quick search
brings these instructions:
For [*nix] e-mail clients which don't support SSL:
1. install stunnel on the client machine;
2. if you want to check the server certificate (optional, but
recommended), copy the server
Your last two emails, and your test came through here fine.
I'm not sure what you're asking exactly, but if it's for an opinion; I
don't think restarting via email is a great plan. Surely, if you have
the need to reboot your server like this, there are other issues with
the server that need
, John Kielkopf john@webifi.com wrote:
Your last two emails, and your test came through here fine.
I'm not sure what you're asking exactly, but if it's for an opinion; I
don't think restarting via email is a great plan. Surely, if you have
the need to reboot your server like this, there are other
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de John Kielkopf
Envoyé : lundi 6 mars 2006 18:25
À : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] RCPT TO smtp filter.
Davide,
How difficult would it be to add filters that are triggered for each
RCPT TO, similar
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Just don't ask me to call out filter for every input
char next time! :)
Damn, and I was just going to ask for that! ;)
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the
Davide,
How difficult would it be to add filters that are triggered for each
RCPT TO, similar to smtp pre-data filters? Does functionality like this
already exist in Xmail?
It would be helpful in the case of greylist and blacklist filters to
add more granularity than all or nothing when
Lars wrote:
Hi,
i'm using now dovecot as an imap-server.
it works good, but there is a behaviour which went me crazy.
if i made a new folder an move some mails there, the pop3-account
collects this (old) mails as new mails and i get the mails twice.
is there a better way?
Use dovecote
Lars wrote:
John Kielkopf schrieb:
Lars wrote:
Hi,
i'm using now dovecot as an imap-server.
it works good, but there is a behaviour which went me crazy.
if i made a new folder an move some mails there, the pop3-account
collects this (old) mails as new mails and i get the mails
Doesn't SMTP-MaxErrors in server.tab help with this?
Henri van Riel wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a peculiar problem. My domain (a sub-domain of my ISP)
receives a lot of (spam) email. I'm talking more than 15,000 emails
per day (about 10mb/hour). All these emails are for recipients *not*
defined
I'll try to find time this weekend to isolate and post it then Don
t be afraid to pester me if I let slip my mind.
--John
Rob Arends wrote:
Please do, if you wouldn't mind.
Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
John Kielkopf a écrit :
I wrote my own pre-data list filter to solve
I wrote my own pre-data list filter to solve this, and stopped using
xmail's CustMapsList.
I have my doubts that Xmail's CustMapsList granularity comfortably fits
most of us with more than one domain.
--John
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
You have the option to install another instance of xmail on
Filip Supera wrote:
Hello,
John Kielkopf a écrit :
I wrote my own pre-data list filter to solve this, and stopped using
xmail's CustMapsList.
Does your filter query Maps lists ? And if yes would you mind sharing an
example ?
My current filter is in PHP, and as such isn't
You can, however, use another Imap/pop3 server, like Dovecot, and then
just use Xmail for smtp.
This isn't too tough to do under Linux, but on Windows it may be a bit
more involved.
Mike Harrington wrote:
XMail doesn't support IMAP.
- Original Message -
From: Erwin Meulensteen
I use Dovecot for Imap and POP3, but on Linux. If you can get Dovecot
running under cygwin on Windows, you probably have a chance of getting a
similar set-up working.
Erwin Meulensteen wrote:
Is there a way with the help of other software to manage since xmail is
using a folder structure
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
SpamCop is blocking servers based on misdirected bounces. SpamCop wants
all legit email servers to suppress bounce messages. Is there any way to
prevent XMail from sending nondelivery messages? I realize this violates an
RFC, but SpamCop is blocking servers based on
Bill Healy wrote:
If so then maybe you should look into a filter that can validate
delivery addresses before accepting a message.
I would think that just doing virus scanning in a post-data filter on
the secondary MX should be enough to limit a good majority of
misdirected bounces that
I agree, it is best to have the secondary/scanning server know what
accounts are real or not, but this isn't always practical to enforce.
Still, in the case that the secondary does attempt delivery to a
non-existent account, as long as it's already decided that it's not a
virus, the mailbox
Bill Healy wrote:
The majority of the messages my servers turn away are pure spam and most
are addressed to accounts that have never existed, so it's not like the
addresses have been harvested from someone's infected computer. It's
become common now to just try long lists of common names
Hey Dale,
One problem with filtering in filters.in.tab, is that you'll end up
scanning the message once for every recipient on the list... so you
could end up scanning the same message a number of times over. I prefer
to do it in a post-data filter, allowing the message to be scanned once,
They should be near the same, however, I don't know if the spool files
accessible via normal mail filters (filters.in.tab/filters.out.tab) have
the {ra=real-address} info on the RCPT TO: line like you get with smtp
message filters. They may, but I honestly haven't used them much since
Davide
I've been using clamav for some time now and haven't had a problem with
it that I know of.
I use my own filter for it. If you want to give it a shot, see:
http://www.webifi.com/xmail/xmclam.tar.gz
--John
Dale Qualls wrote:
Thanks Davide and Don for the help. I had previously remmed out the
The mail-auth setting in server.tab may be what you're after, but I
don't know if it overrides smtprelay.tab or not.
-John
Achim Schmidt wrote:
Hello List,
because of the amount of Virus-Emails we are facing a major problem now.
First let me explain our current MX-Constellation:
- Mail for
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
Pooling for changes that might or might not have been made to the
mailusers.tab is just a plain waste. When in the end you could just push the
changes.
Polling for changes to mailusers.tab takes relatively no resources, and
can be done in very few lines of code:
Does this still work if you want to keep xmail using it's mailusers.tab
for pop/smtp authentication?
Mike Harrington wrote:
It's already available (although a bit limited). Look in the documentation
under External Authentication and look closely at the useradd, useredit,
userdel, and
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
And people gave me the 3rd degree about
my idea.
I'm sorry if you took my response as the 3rd degree, but I simply
stated a reasonable workaround that gets the same job done for me in a
relatively simple way, that kept me from asking Davide for the same
thing.
To sync Xmail users with dovecot (for imap), we simply have a script
that sits in a loop waiting for mailusers.tab to change. When it sees
a change, it fires off a another script that syncs the changes.
-John
Adrian Hicks wrote:
As far as syncing goes we're using LDAP here. It's now
I'm not sure if this is what he's refering to, but most (all?) of the
ClamAV filters I've seen posted for Xmail will not catch all test virus
samples from places like http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
In order to catch all of them, the filters need to strip Xmail's special
header information
Sorry, forgot to add: you also need to detect and repair a bad End Of
Header (ie: no double crlf between the start of the body, and end of
the headers).
John Kielkopf wrote:
I'm not sure if this is what he's refering to, but most (all?) of the
ClamAV filters I've seen posted for Xmail
I think most web browsers will cycle through A records until it finds
one that works. I see no reason why an MTA shouldn't.
RFC 2821 Section 5 says:
When the lookup succeeds, the mapping can result in a list of
alternative delivery addresses rather than a single address, because of
multiple
Ok, it looks like we may be having this problem as well.
Running 1.21 on linux.
We're having trouble sending mail to greenbaycc.org
greenbaycc.org has an MX record of mail.greenbaycc.org, that points
to an A record of 67.39.138.28.
There is no A record for greenbaycc.org, however Xmail
-Server = intergraonline.com
Again, intergraonline.com has an MX record: ix2-mail-gw.new.net
So why is XMail trying intergraonline.com??
--John
John Kielkopf wrote:
Ok, it looks like we may be having this problem as well.
Running 1.21 on linux.
We're having trouble sending mail to greenbaycc.org
Davide Libenzi wrote:
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns02.taiasp.net.
greenbaycc.org. 86400 IN NS taadns01.taiasp.net.
;; Received 88 bytes from 204.74.112.1#53(TLD1.ULTRADNS.NET) in 58 ms
greenbaycc.org. 3600IN NS taadns01.
;;
I had some trouble scanning larger messages with filters.post-data, so I
opted to scan anything = 1MB with post-data and anything 1MB with
filters.in.
--John
Rob Arends wrote:
IIRC pre/post-data filters only work on incoming smtp (someone correct me
if wrong)
So it is a perfect place to
We used to run Xmail on windows with MS DNS for some time. I don't
recall ever having this problem.
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
We run XMail on Windows, but we use Bind on Windows instead of Microsoft
DNS. I do not think we have had any problems with yahoo and hotmail. Were
the people seeing
Leonardo,
Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the tests at:
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail on, if any?
Leonardo Fogel wrote:
The smtp session will be longer. So, maybe you will
need to raise the max number of smtp threads.
I
Davide,
When mail is sent with a bad EOH, (no double CRLF separating the header
from the message body), it appears that the message file available to a
post-data filter doesn't have this corrected. When the message ends up
in the maildir, Xmail seems to have corrected the problem.
It it
Leonardo Fogel wrote:
--- John Kielkopf wrote:
Sorry to go off topic here, but have you tried the
tests at:
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Using clamdscan in post-data, what tests to you fail
on, if any?
Oops. I forgot to mention that in my previous mail. It
fails tests #5, 12, 16
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Please note: This is no logo contest!
_PLEASE_ let the logo as it is: http://www.xmailserver.org/logoxmail.gif
We don't want to invent a new logo, do we? And no 3D-tele-tubbie effects on
the logo pls :)
The fact remains that at smaller sizes, the existing Xmail logo
Any way to sense if an ehlo was used and return a multi line error
response in smtp message filters using @@FILE.rej?
Something like:
550-Line1
550-Line2
550 Last line
--John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Try lightly applying a sharpen filter.
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Nope - because it's a logo and we don't want to change it in any way
except resizing :)
Maybe you prefer the updated one:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
(light grey bgcolor and diagonal 'powered by'
-
-
To unsubscribe from
Any way to have macros like @@REMOTEADDR in the SmtpMsgIPBan messages?
--John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michal Altair Valasek wrote:
I think that it may be some bug in Xmail - message is accepted as valid at
input, but is not valid at output. I am not C programmer, so I cannot
investigate the source. I would try to collect offending messages and find
exact cause. Some messages have text, which
Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
With just telling ClamAV to scan the message file supplied by Xmail,
It'll miss a number of the test from http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
If I build a new temp file to scan doing the following:
- Strip MAIL-DATA and everything before
- Add a
, and it caught them quite well, but that was all I had to
test with. Improvements are welcome.
John Kielkopf wrote:
Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
With just telling ClamAV to scan the message file supplied by Xmail,
It'll miss a number of the test from http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi John -
I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender -
ASSP - clamSMTP - XMail - sendee). As it turns out, after testing,
the emails didn't even reach my anti-virus because
Jeff Buehler wrote:
I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers for a number of
reasons, so I discourage it.
I agree, however some of my users may say otherwise ;)
I was thinking about scanning all messages 2MB
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, May 27, 2005 2:58 AM:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, John Kielkopf wrote:
=20
Have a strange problem here.
=20
Users that have Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Spam Killer
active have trouble with mail clogging up their systems from
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, May 27, 2005 2:58 AM:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, John Kielkopf wrote:
=20
Have a strange problem here.
=20
Users that have Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Spam Killer
active have trouble with mail clogging up their systems from
John Kielkopf wrote:
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, May 27, 2005 2:58 AM:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, John Kielkopf wrote:
=20
Have a strange problem here.
=20
Users that have Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Spam Killer
active have trouble
CLEMENT Francis wrote:
I had the same problem when using symantec av smtp gateway and some =
clients
too with some avs ...
First, note that a pure mta have nothing to do with the message itself
(expect to add its own Received from, etc, in the header part) and have =
not
to control it. The pure
Have a strange problem here.
Users that have Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Spam Killer active
have trouble with mail clogging up their systems from time to time.
Disabling the products lets them receive the mail.
Although these users complain that they never had these problems with
any
I usually use the spam database lookup on http://dnsstuff.com/. It
seems a little more thorough than ordb.org.
Edinilson's subnet appears to be listed on JAMMDNSBL... though I doubt
hotmail uses that list.
--John
null wrote:
Greetings all,
I couldn't agree with you more on ALL counts. I
I agree. This would be nice to have as part of xmail, and not force its
implementation in a filter. I'm honestly surprised we're the only two
on the list that has run into the need for it.
That said, we all know Davide has a full plate at the moment, so using a
filter as an interim solution
Actually, double taping won't work unless they add a substantial
delay in sending the next mail. Any server that tries again too soon is
badly configured, or a spammer. It then gives you times to let that
spammers IP get propagated on some of the black lists.
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
If this
Is the other smtp server in a different location than the xmail
server? Is it possible the other smtp server in the first scenario is
just delivering the message to the client faster?
Could be something as simple as the difference in available bandwidth.
--John
Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
A pre-data filter can work just fine here.
Yes, but being able to set something like mail-auth 0.0.0.0:587,...
in server.tab would be better ;)
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
like 26 that seen only from the lan and
does require auth smtp. But still have port 25 visable from the wan/lan
and have it still require Auth-smtp.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
John Kielkopf wrote:
Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port
I think this: http://spf.pobox.com/faq.html#churn explains it well.
It certainly complicates spamming... and that can't be a bad thing.
-John
Michael Luke wrote:
Mike Harrington wrote:
Hey guys, just read these articles about spammers using SPF. Thought
you might find them interesting as
Is it possible on Xmail to force SMTP auth based on the port the
connection was established on?
Currently, I accept connections on port 25 (SMTP) and port 587 (MSA). I
want port 25 to accept mail for local accounts without auth as normal,
but I want to require auth on port 587... The more I
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106
Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth
provider should be able to create it for you, or delegate a reverse
lookup zone to you.
-John
Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
Hey Folks,
I just had an email bounced back saying my
Noor Dawod wrote:
Hello,
I run XMAIL 1.20 which I installed few days ago. We have few POP
accounts for the company, and the domain's MX records of course point to
this XMAIL box. We all use Microsoft Outlook 2000 or XP to fetch from
the POP3 server.
I have a weird case that I'm seeing for few
Kirk Friggstad wrote:
Hey all:
We've recently installed a Barracuda (rack-mount spam firewall based on
Spam Assassin, also does virus scanning) on our network in front of our
XMail system, and pointed our MX records to deliver mail to the Barracuda
instead of directly to our server. This change
lac wrote:
--- Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't speak for anyone else, but I've found that denying service to
dynamic addresses (based on RDNS patterns) to be a very effective tool
for reducing both spam and virus traffic. Since most (not all, as has been
pointed out here in the
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have ALWAYS had to make those DIR manaually. Xmail has never made them
for us. Only the numbered ones does it make.
Yes, the numberred ones. Tell me again why would you remove directories
from the XMail
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
For us that have been using Xmail for a lng time, the directory for
each domain under *cmdaliases* doesn't always exists, since they weren't
created by older versions of xmail... This only causes problems when
removing
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
For us that have been using Xmail for a lng time, the directory for
each domain under *cmdaliases* doesn't always exists, since they weren't
Yes, but older versions of Xmail ( 1.2 ) didn't, so many of my older
domains don't have these directories.
Ok, I'll put a check in 1.21 ...
Thanks!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
On one of my Xmail servers (win32 1.18) with ~50 domains, when adding or
removing a domain I always seem to get an error. When adding (using
ctrl) I get -00017 Unable to create directory, when deleting, I get
-00018 Unable to remove directory.
However, in both cases, the directory _is_
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
On one of my Xmail servers (win32 1.18) with ~50 domains, when adding or
removing a domain I always seem to get an error. When adding (using
ctrl) I get -00017 Unable to create directory, when deleting, I get
-00018 Unable
Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
Well, now you have. Any ideas?
Well, the fine OS returns error on RemoveDirectory(), but then deletes the
directory. Isn't it sweet? Many OSs implement the delayed removal feature,
but returning error and deleting the directory after that sounds screwy
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
AVG was installed, but not set to run in any on-access way (was used
for scanning mail, until we switched to McAfee command line scanner). I
uninstalled AVG and re-started the machine, but no change.
This happens when
John Kielkopf wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
AVG was installed, but not set to run in any on-access way (was used
for scanning mail, until we switched to McAfee command line scanner). I
uninstalled AVG and re-started the machine
Xmail Administrator 0.26 is out and adds support for Xmail 1.19/1.20
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
Sorry I didn't get this out earlier.
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
Sorry,
It's fixed now.
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
-John
Shiloh Jennings wrote:
The XmailAdmin tool from http://www.webifi.com/xmail/ worked great with
XMail 1.17, but crashes with XMail 1.20. When I click on the server =
name to
bring up a list of domains, it says Run-time error '5':
Sorry,
It's fixed now.
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
-John
Peter Lindeman wrote:
Davide Libenzi wrote:
I think in 1.18 the format of a CTRL command changed. Let me see ... yes,
aliasdomainlist. Maybe this screw up the tool. Pls contact the author.
1.18 still worked with the tool.
This is concerning our admin people ;-)
Kind regards,
Fr=E9d=E9ric
- Original Message -
From: John Kielkopf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.26
Xmail Administrator 0.26 is out and adds support for Xmail 1.19/1.20
http
-
From: John Kielkopf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.26
Xmail Administrator 0.26 is out and adds support for Xmail 1.19/1.20
http://www.webifi.com/xmail
Sorry I didn't get this out earlier.
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list
Version: 1,2 now!! (version 1.2 dates from November 12, 2001 and is
a whole lot different from 1.20!)
I know these issues are not critical, but such things are nevertheless important for
the overall image of your application. :)
Kind regards,
Frederic
- Original Message -
From: John Kielkopf
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Thu, 27 May 2004, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
1.19 pre06 running ok on W2k sp4.
Low volume, with filters that were running on 1.17, Avfilter, XAV, and
another that I wrote myself.
Also checked POP3link, in/out bound smtp and pop3, all ok for 20 minutes
now.
No plans
Are the DNS queries by xmail for CustMapsList performed in parallel?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2004, John Kielkopf wrote:
Are the DNS queries by xmail for CustMapsList performed in parallel?
Multiple threads can issue parallel request, but a single SMTP connection
(thread) does it in a serial way.
Thanks for the quick answer.
Anyone
Francesco Vertova wrote:
At 12.11 12/05/04 -0500, you wrote:
Why Xmail decided to use the A record from the next DNS it was
able to talk with is beyond me.
My dns reports MX information for bioenergy.com as Non-authoritative. It
seems - I've seen this other times - that in such a
Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Bill Healy wrote:
You have an A record that points back to yourself
bioenergy.com. 3580IN A 207.67.28.220
Don't know why xmail is giving preference to the A record when an MX
record exists. Interesting
bioenergy.com.
Inside @@FILE, is RCPT TO:... resolved to the real address (if
applicable)? If not, is there an easy way to do this without having
my filter use the admin protocol?
ATM it's not resolved, but I asked Davide, too. And the admin protocol is to
slow for the filter at SMTP DATA stage and
Davide Libenzi wrote:
Ok, I added @@USERAUTH, @@REMOTEADDR and @@LOCALADDR
Inside @@FILE, is RCPT TO:... resolved to the real address (if
applicable)? If not, is there an easy way to do this without having my
filter use the admin protocol?
-John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Any easy way to get Xmail to not refuse mail from servers listed in a black list on a
per domain or per user basis, without putting those domains on a different server, and
without using a filter that has to wait for the entire email to be received before
refusing it?
Thanks,
-John
-
To
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
