Hello everyone,
I've recently upgraded from Win2k+Xmail 1.25 to RHEL5.5 + Xmail 1.27.
This is also on a new hosting provider in a new city.
So much has changed.
I used to be able to send to this person @ dinglepartners.com.au
However now I get error 256.
Immediately I assumed
Rob Arends
Envoye : mardi 18 janvier 2011 14:43
A : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Knowing who is failing Auth Logins
Hello,
I'm running xmail 1.27 on RHEL5.5
The SMTP logs are showing a single AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN every hour at xx:00
hours.
It is coming from the same PC I believe
and view
it a little easier - perhaps Wireshark will decode it for my viewing?
Rob :-)
-Original Message-
From: xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org [mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:28 AM
To: 'XMail Users Mailing List'
Subject: Re
://www.samlogic.net/articles/smtp-commands-reference-auth.htm
Expecting the 'client' use PLAIN or LOGIN to help you quickly :)
Regards
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org
[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]De la part de Rob Arends
Envoye : mercredi 19 janvier 2011 15:13
Hello,
I'm running xmail 1.27 on RHEL5.5
The SMTP logs are showing a single AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN every hour at xx:00
hours.
It is coming from the same PC I believe, although IP changes, the ISP and
area indicated by the rDNS suggests it is the same PC.
Most mail clients attempt POP3
Hi Davide,
This raises an interesting question...
How do 3rd party IMAP implementations handle multiple Xmail domains.
It looks like the IMAP instance is pointed to one Xmail domain only.
Has anyone got any experience with IMAP (any brand) and Xmail with multiple
domains?
Can it be done with
maibox content to unix =
maildirs,
he need to use some dos2unix command (or d2u ? don't remember exactly =
the
tool name on linux) in the proposed script, no ?
:)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Rob Arends
Envoy=E9 : dimanche 7
Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:22 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
Your probably correct.
Although Xmail won't care - it will handle either.
Bingo. XMail is not as dumb as other softwares, so a message with CRLF
inside
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 2:22 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
If I wanted to use the default unix storage format - is it possible
] On
Behalf Of RICK AND SHEILA
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 12:54 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
Rob, I have signed on to X-Mail to see if it will allow me to receive my
vehicle report from On- Star. Is this going to help?
They send in X-Mail Text. Rick
Rob Arends
On Thursday, September 04, 2008 4:22 AM, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide, just out of curiosity.
Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
Could you have read the file and converted LF-CRLF on the fly while
sending
the TCP data
So this will make my planned IMAP4 implementation easier.
I'm running on w32 and planning to go Linux (mail is my only legacy W32
platform) and then implement a native Linux IMAP4 server, but I remember
lots of work arounds for the CRLF/LF issue, so I was not exited about the
idea of
nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
busy.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Saturday, September 06, 2008 8:01 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.26-pre03
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
So
Davide, just out of curiosity.
Regarding the LF on disk vs CRLF in the SMTP protocol:
Could you have read the file and converted LF-CRLF on the fly while sending
the TCP data?
Or does that create a performance hit that is unacceptable?
Rob :-)
of posterity!
Thanks,
Jeff
Rob Arends wrote:
This will be a fault where the world uses you public IP to access your
zone
hosted on your server, but when your server tries to resolve
dns1.buehlertech.net it is not contactable (probably because of NAT on a
firewall) and so tries dns2
24, 2008 7:10 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: -ERR Invalid Syntax on PASS command (POP)
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Rob Arends wrote:
I believe that, at startup, if xmail does not find ALL the folders it
requires, then it should do one of two things.
1. create the missing folders
Harald,
You need to be clear on the difference:
Relay denied and Server down *ARE* different things.
If it is DOWN, then the next one would be used, but
If it responds with a deny, then you have an answer, end of story.
Think of DNS, it does the same thing.
If a server *responds* then your next
Hal,
You are very close to the solution.
Xmail on windows can by run as xmail2 also.
Just copy the whole xmail dir structure to a new location.
Rename the xmail binary to xmail2
Copy the registry for gnu/xmail to gnu/xmail2 (match the binary name (case
too, I think))
Ensuring correct IP bindings
This will be a fault where the world uses you public IP to access your zone
hosted on your server, but when your server tries to resolve
dns1.buehlertech.net it is not contactable (probably because of NAT on a
firewall) and so tries dns2.buehlertech.net, but it is also not contactable.
Then it
Yes you can,
But they will use different $MailRoots
I'm fairly sure the doco covers the topic; otherwise it has certainly been
covered on this list, so a google search will help.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular
Harald / Davide,
I just read the smtpfwd link below and would expect that the next in the
list would be used at some time.
Except for the # random prefix, it does not state when the 2nd,3rd, etc
specified servers would be used.
One assumes that it would be upon failure of the first server.
If it
system TEMP folder is another one.
Like they said.
-- Harald
Rob Arends wrote:
Any thoughts on this one Davide?
What does the (-20) error indicate?
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular level
Of Rob Arends
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 1:26 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 451 Requested action aborted: (-20) local error in
processing
Hi Davide,
There are no entries in the event log.
The only evidence there was anything wrong was that the only entries in the
smtp log
:47 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 451 Requested action aborted: (-20) local error in
processing
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Hi Davide,
I'm just trying to move an xmail setup to a win 2003 64bit server, and
have
got 99% of the way.
However I find that I'm getting
Hi Tracy,
I've done [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But not specifically tested your [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have to lab it; so I think you are left in the same boat.
Sorry.
Rob :-)
_
It might look like I'm doing nothing, but on a cellular level, I'm quite
Gut feel says there is a firewall (appliance?) that is forcing a limited set
of SMTP commands.
Like HELO, but not EHLO.
The Cisco PIX does this if you have 'fixup smtp' on.
Just turn it off. It will also allow authenticated SMTP too then.
If not a FW, then dunno!!
Rob :-)
I came across this little command, thought someone might find it useful
testing SSL on xmail:
openssl s_client -showcerts -starttls smtp -connect
x35.xmailserver.org:25
It uses openssl to 'telnet' to your smtp server and display a hole heap of
info about the SSL info it finds.
you
Ana Paula, I see the same as David, sorry!
I'm running under W2K SP4 Xmail 1.25pre09.
ID:S3543D
Mail From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rcpt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Server:spirit.ps5.com.br [200.199.251.151]
[02] The reason of the delivery failure was:
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: User unknown in
the in-depth knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 10:36 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS
See here:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_client_authentication=20
Either
The cause of not getting email from xmail-list after upgrade to 1.24 =
will be
that x35.xmailserver.org is attempting to negotiate TLS, when you do =
not
have TLS correctly configured - either fully off, or with correct
certificates.
Please search the archives to find the answers either way.
First thing to find out is if your ISP will allow you to relay for free.
Second thing is, if you use SPF records, then include your ISP outgoing IP
address(es) in your SPF record.
Then if at least #1, then relay via ISP.
Those MTAs that deny mail from dynamic IPs, must not deny from the MTAs of
]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:44 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: XP Issue
READ THE MANUAL
Look for the BUILD section. Subsection [Windows]
Every Win install requires this library installed ever since xmail
supports SSL Even if you do not use / want
, 2007 12:06 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Dynamic DNS
Thanks, it appears I can relay but must logon, presenting a different
setup up problem. How to do this in xmail?=20
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent
Davide, I've searched the archives readmes, and can't seem to find the
field descriptions for the Glst 0.24 dump files.
I run
dbdump --dbfile glst.dbm --output glist.txt
dbdump --dbfile glst-lame.dbm --output glist-lame.txt
and then get (email addresses modified below)
LAME:
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 11:51 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
SO Getting back to the real issue at hand...
Why would a VERY large ISP (optusnet.com.au) be broken.
It certainly
:
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
I have had to turn on smartdnshost again.
After having an error-free run for quite a while, this morning I see
errors.
Investigation shows.
Issue 1:
-
- Partial Bounce email content:
(I've swapped @ for *)
ID
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 9:49 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
I have had to turn on smartdnshost again.
After having an error-free run for quite a while
: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:43 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote
] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 2:13 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Rob Arends wrote:
Also, using smartdnshost (local named process)
So basically you're still using 1.24 :)
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list
READ THE MANUAL
Look for the BUILD section. Subsection [Windows]
Every Win install requires this library installed ever since xmail supports
SSL
Even if you do not use / want / configure SSL, you must install the library.
Just install it, then use the xmail binaries as you always have.
Rob
:-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:45 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: 1.25-pre06 ...
Oh, ok !!
So you
Davide, running on Win2ksp4 here for 3 days - seems to be ok. (No SSL)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide
Also, using smartdnshost (local named process)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, April 16
Dale,
I use 7 minutes as I found 60 mins was too long, and that it works just
as well with 7 mins.
You could try less if you wanted.
Software without development just means no new features not
unsupported/dead.
There are some 'enhancements' that I'd like to propose for Davide's
What? - (re)create the symlink every day.
Talk about administrative overhead.!!
I suppose, I'm looking at most other open source applications, and I see a
single (dateless) logfile the is rotated by logwatch or similar and would
like to see similar option with xmail.
Sure I could run a cron job
Hmm,
I think you could do that using a pre-data filter - providing the SIZE=xxx
was specified in the initial SMTP dialog.
I'm not sure if the SIZE value is mandatory.
You could also do it using a post-data filter - you would know the size of
the file on disk by then.
Rob :-)
Davide,
I'm looking at methods of analysing/reporting the xmail logs better.
Really I'd like to get real-time into mysql.
One way is to use a named pipe and another is to just tail a file into
another process.
The tail method doesn't recover well from restarting the conversion process,
unless it
Scott, you have guessed correctly 1.24 will allow you to send email from a
specific IP address.
I must admit - I looked at the Readme expecting to find the answer
plain-as-day
(searched for 'outbind' and got two hits), and not much explanation on how
to use it.
One hit is under 'POP3links.tab'
Tracy,
your spamtrap emails will be seen as individual addresses until the smtp
session is closed, then xmail puts them all in one mbox.
Glst will see them all - this will affect your db size - unless you are
bypassing glst on your spamtrap emails.
Rob :-)
...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:37 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Question about GLST
Rob Arends wrote:
your spamtrap emails will be seen as individual addresses until the smtp
session
Davide / Don,
I believe the third line:
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/crt/yourdomainname.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/crt/private.key
SSLCACertificateFile /etc/ssl/crt/SERVERNAME.ca-bundle
...refers to a single file that is in-effect the same as the ./certs/ folder
supplied with
Dale and Scott,
I solved this by using xmail as the secondary mail server AND having a
nightly script that gathered the valid email address from the primary MTA
and created ./cmdalias/domain.com/.tab files with
smtprelay[tab]mail.domain.com inside.
Other than that xmail is set for no relay,
Davide,
I was setting up an new xmail server for someone, when I got a ENODNS error
on my test email.
The error was due to a DNS timeout, because a resend of the test email
worked fine.
The error message (in part) that I got back was:
mail.company.net.au #5.0.0 smtp; 505 Your domain has not
The base cause of this is a drop in communication b/n the MUA and the =
MTA.
(Could be a time out too).
Consider the MUA transactions in aPOP3 session.
(Pr=E9cis'd)
Connect.
Login.
Request list in mail headers with unique id.
Download mail.
Delete mail based on unique id.
Disconnect.
Now if
Hi everyone,
The following oops was due to an older 'errors' table on the website.
(I think it was for 1.21)
Ok, it's not ERR_SHMAT but ERR_NO_ROOT_DOMAIN_VAR. You're missing the
RootDomain server.tab variable.
I made a script to extract error codes, and that's the output ...
So I've
Ps: maybe I have to specify parameters at start ?
Yes you do.
The doc (readme.html) has the answers - look for Command Line - Note the
LOG switches are lowercase L.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
Francis,
Sounds like yahoo is checking anti spam criteria and determining that you
are not worthy.
Perhaps the checks are asynchronous and so when the negative results come
in, the MTA abruptly and belatedly shuts the door.
I have had problems with hotmail some time ago. My fix was to use
.
Do you have paypal?
On 1/22/07, Rob Arends [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasup, you are missing it altogether.
Yes Xmail creates the filenames you listed (the names are a combination
of:
seconds since 1/1/1970 00:00 DOT ProcessID DOT Hex counter of
messages
since xmail started DOT server
TO ANY ONE THAT IS MIGRATING TO 1.24
Please either:
1. configure the crypto keys according to the doco.
Or
2. add these lines to your server.tab
SMTP-TLS[tab]0[crlf]
EnableCTRL-TLS[tab]0[crlf]
EnableSMTP-TLS[tab]0[crlf]
EnablePOP3-TLS[tab]0[crlf]
You will get
application defaults be changed or can the defaults in the
server.tab be changed so that a standard install without SSL will work?
Thanks for the help, Hal...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:36 PM
?
START ---PLEASE USE THIS d:\xmail\xmail_filters\hi-pri.cmd ---
@echo off
REM Written by Rob Arends
REM
REM Script to return 16 to Xmail if the email is NOT of high Importance.
setlocal
set FILE=%1
grep -Pqi ^X-Priority:\s*1\s %FILE%
set XPriHigh=%ERRORLEVEL%
grep -Pqi ^X-MSMail-Priority:\s*High
Francis, Sounds go on the surface.
But I think ETRN sends to the MX server, not the IP address requesting the
ETRN.
Is this correct?
If so, then the DNS would need to be updated before the ETRN issued.
Why not use the DYNDNS support in xmail on xmail(2).
Rob :-)
shown %n
variables.
So, your test.cmd should look like this:
@echo off
REM Written by Rob Arends
REM
REM Script to return 16 to Xmail if the email is NOT of high Importance.
setlocal
grep -Pqi ^X-Priority:\s*1\s %1
set XPriHigh=%ERRORLEVEL%
grep -Pqi ^X-MSMail-Priority:\s*High %1
set XMSPriHigh
Wow, would you like some of the warmth here??
I'd really like some of the cold - but not all of it.
Yesterday it was 43C with overnight 25C
Today was 37C.
This is unusual in this neck of the woods (Coastal, South Eastern Australia
- Melbourne to be precise)
Usually over summer (Dec to March) we
would like to change the mailserver's ip address from 213.160.217.191
to 213.160.217.171
Would this give any problems?
Erwin
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Namens Rob Arends
Verzonden: zondag 14 januari 2007 12:46
Aan: xmail@xmailserver.org
(localhost) and use that IP
only in your smtp-server.tab
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday
here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Lord
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 11:03 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: gun for hire
On 15 Jan 2007, at 20:49, Rob Arends wrote:
4.
What did you find in your logs
Just one note:
In the Filters.log relating to the @@FILE macro.
Now that you are logging the full command line to the log, I notice that
in/out filters seem to be getting \\?\D:\Mailroot\spool\etc
But post-rcpt/pre-data (and maybe post-data) are getting C:\WINNT\TEMP\etc
The issue is not the
Davide, let me first quote your documentation:
quote
!flags[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
Each file may contain multiple commands, that will be executed in strictly
sequential order. The first command that will trigger a rejection code will
make the filtering process to end.
Davide,
I just noticed that macros @@MSGID @@MSGREF are available in in/out
filters, but return nothing when used in a post-data filter.
Also the values of @@REMOTEADDR @@LOCALADDR return [1.2.3.4]:25 for
in/out filters, but for post-data, it returns just the IP address, not even
the brackets.
Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:14 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: macros available to various filters
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
I just noticed that macros @@MSGID @@MSGREF are available in in/out
filters, but return nothing when used in a post-data filter
: Monday, 20 November 2006 7:49 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex wlex
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide, let me first quote your documentation:
quote
!flags[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
Each file may contain multiple commands
later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:46 AM
To: XMail mailing list
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex wlex
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:59 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex wlex
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Ok, for consistency with the doc, now you can do the aex=0 smart thing.
Ok, ignore crossed email
BTW
witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 8:18 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter log info..
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 9:04 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex wlex
Ok, thanks, so I'll test with
!aex=1[tab]prog - user is auth'd
!aex=0[tab]prog - user is not auth'd
Rob
@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter log info..
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide,
The doc does not offer wait-timeout for pre/post filters.
1. how do you control/set the timeout of a filter that is not an
in/out filter.
2. What is the default timeout on filters?
From
something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 20 November 2006 10:29 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: filter aex wlex
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide
Yes I had come to that conclusion - I am now testing @@USERAUTH=- in a
wrapper.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Same here (w2ksp4) with filters (in/out/pre-data/post-rcpt)
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ana Paula Fernandes
It's like this
Mailproc.tab is explained in the doco (readme.html) so please start there.
What OS are you running?
What language will the script be in?
There are so many questions you need to answer, but have not.
The script you are looking for does not exist. This means it will need to
be
Libenzi
Sent: Monday, 13 November 2006 3:26 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than**
smail/smtp/filter/etc log files... =20 Where does Xmail write errors
like file
something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, 14 November 2006 5:40 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error messages
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
XMail
Running pre 14, win2k sp4. with in/out/pre-data/post-rcpt filters; good so
far.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Davide, in the case where xmail emits an error - **other than**
smail/smtp/filter/etc log files...
Where does Xmail write errors like file missing on return from filter??
I know in sendmail this is written to the maillog. In debug mode it might
write to screen, but that information is lost if
Still on pre11, but I've been running with a post-rcpt glst filter for 24
hrs now without problem, in addition to the existing post/pre-data in/out
filters.
Running on W2k sp4.
I'll move to pre 12 now.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put
Hmm, I had that under 1.23pre04. I then removed the port-rcpt filter and
upgraded to 1.23pre11
I'll have a look at adding the port-rcpt filter again and if it fails, then
look at the jit debugger.
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put
Davide, I read this:
- Added complex/multiple macro substitution capabilities to external
programs argoument lists.
And found this in the readme:
MACRO SUBSTITUTION
XMail support two kinds of macro declaration inside
@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Thanks Davide,
Note, is this file still current http://www.xmailserver.org/glst It
seems to say 0.24, but then other parts don't look like they've been
updated.
Which other parts
Davide, typically would you remove the predata filter version of the glst
when the post-rcpt is added?
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Davide, I'm curious. The original GLST implementation dealt with the triplet
of info, the host IP, the To and From email address.
I notice that in the post-rcpt implementation, the filters log shows * as
the second entry.
How does this integrate with the triplets already in the database?
Why
Francesco,
You are correct in that DNS does allow trailing dot, in fact when we use dns
names without trailing dots, we are using relative dns names.
This is why you configure a domain name in your resolv.conf or in windows'
interface dns dialog.
I have no idea as to why the MTA RFC might not
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Friday, 3 November 2006 3:00 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: Post RCPT filter for GLST ...
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Rob Arends wrote:
Davide, I'm curious. The original GLST implementation dealt
Norbert,
There are DNS block lists out there that allow you to look up a domain to
see if it is listed, in just the same way you'd look up an ip address in a
RBL.
Something like
If the RBL was rbl.tld.cc
And the domain to look up was spammer.com
Then...
spammer.com.rbl.tld.cc
If it
] On
Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Wednesday, 1 November 2006 11:58 PM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: spam-address.tab size
Rob Arends wrote:
snip some stuff
Then in xmail's server.tab - CustMapsList, list your RBL first.
(obviously you'd need your resolv.conf to point to your named
otherwise
1.23-pre04 has been running on my small server (approx 15 mailboxes on 5
domain names) for about 12 minutes. No problem so far.
Win2000 SP4
( Just dropped in the new exe, only )
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here
Thanks Davide,
Note, is this file still current http://www.xmailserver.org/glst
It seems to say 0.24, but then other parts don't look like they've been
updated.
Could I also trouble you for a w32 binary, for us poor saps that don't get a
C compiler with their OS.
Rob :-)
Yes please
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 5:21 AM
To: XMail
Would that not be a problem with your spam filter, and not a problem with
xMail ??
Rob :-)
_
Note To Self: Remember to put something witty here later...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
You cannot change it per smtp connection when you host multiple domains.
To do that, you need to run multiple instances of xmail, each with one
domain.
The idea of the HELO/EHLO is to identify the host, rather than the domain of
the email being sent.
The host sending does not need to in the same
1 - 100 of 387 matches
Mail list logo
