[xmail] Re: Open relay ?

2004-02-09 Thread Tim Aranki
Filip, Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account. -tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Filip Supera Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:28 AM

[xmail] Re: Open relay ?

2004-02-09 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote: Filip, Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account. This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Davide - To unsubscribe from

[xmail] Re: Open relay ?

2004-02-09 Thread Filip Supera
Mircea Ciocan a écrit : Eh Davide, maybe is time to have the smtprelay.tab with 127.0.0.1[TAB]255.255.255.255, the rpms I build are this way, it seem that NOBODY read the documentation BEFORE installing and starting Xmailserver :(. This is not true :-) I did read it. Filip

[xmail] Re: Open relay ?

2004-02-09 Thread Filip Supera
Davide Libenzi a écrit : On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote: Filip, Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account. This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes,

[xmail] Re: Open Relay

2004-01-16 Thread Mircea Ciocan
Ben Ede wrote: HI, I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are vulnerabilities. I have used the 'out of the box' config. Can anyone point me in the right direction to sort out these probs? Thanks Ben

[xmail] Re: Open Relay

2004-01-16 Thread Ben Ede
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bowen Moursund Sent: 16 January 2004 16:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are vulnerabilities. I

[xmail] Re: Open Relay

2004-01-16 Thread Ben Ede
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mircea Ciocan Sent: 16 January 2004 16:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay Ben Ede wrote: HI, I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay check on it and unfortunately it has

[xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM

2003-07-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Multisoft Solution wrote: I am pretty new in XMail and I do testing in Linux RedHat 9.1 I got a message from our ISP that SPAMCOP told our XMail testing server has become spammers server/open relay I guess. Yesterday I close the open relay through a change at:

[xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM

2003-07-16 Thread Multisoft Solution
. If I would like to allow one IP, let say 205.100.10.1 so SMTPRELAY.tab 205.xxx.xxx.1 TAB255.255.255.255ENTER ?? Thanks, Joe - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM

[xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM

2003-07-16 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:19 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: [xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM Could you give me the example how to do it in detail? Cause I want to make sure it safe, otherwise I would get another security ticket from Spamcop. Thanks, Joe - Original Message

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Gustavo Galvan
You have: EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0 and must be: EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1 Gustavo - Original Message - From: Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:52 PM Subject: [xmail] open relay Ok, I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:00 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay You have: EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0 and must be: EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1 Gustavo - Original Message - From: Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
, but the other tests come back as open relay. benny - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote: Ok, I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote: Ok, I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0 in server.tab. I set my mail client for smtp auth and everything works, and if I dont have smtp auth set it doesn't work(i get

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Steven Peck
That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases. http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208 -Original Message- From: Benny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay =20 =20 =20 Here

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Seth A. Munroe
: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay Here is the email I get from the test site http://abuse.net - This is a test of third-party mail relay, generated via

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
. benny - Original Message - From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:26 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote: Here is the email I get from the test site http://abuse.net

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Andrew Joakimsen
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] nombre de Benny Enviado el: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:24 PM Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Asunto: [xmail] Re: open relay You are right Seth, and of course that makes sense. But am I correct in having: EnableAuthSMTP-POP30 or should it be EnableAuthSMTP-POP31

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
Alright thanks everyone for seeing my dumb mistakes :) And thanks for the clarification on that Seth. I appreciate the help. benny - Original Message - From: Seth A. Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:38 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Steven Peck
-Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steven Peck wrote: =20 That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases. http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208 =20 It does not look like that to me. The form

[xmail] Re: open relay

2003-03-04 Thread Benny
Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:51 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay -Original Message- From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =20 On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steven Peck wrote: =20 That IP Address is listed in two open relay

[xmail] Re: Open Relay

2001-12-10 Thread Scott Dale Robison
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 08:48 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay How are you testing it for relay? Bill -- From: Scott Dale Robison[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay

[xmail] Re: Open Relay

2001-12-10 Thread Scott Dale Robison
mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 09:34 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Scott Dale Robison wrote: I was testing by creating an alternate account in my client (but not on the server... [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I tried to email a message from