Filip,
Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
-tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Filip Supera
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 11:28 AM
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote:
Filip,
Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from
Mircea Ciocan a écrit :
Eh Davide, maybe is time to have the smtprelay.tab with
127.0.0.1[TAB]255.255.255.255, the rpms I build are this way, it
seem that NOBODY read the documentation BEFORE installing and starting
Xmailserver :(.
This is not true :-) I did read it.
Filip
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Tim Aranki wrote:
Filip,
Do you have a catch all alias setup? My guess, is that it did not relay the
message, but rather delivered it to your catch all account.
This is likely the case, since XMail does not support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes,
Ben Ede wrote:
HI,
I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are
vulnerabilities. I have used the 'out of the box' config. Can anyone
point me in the right direction to sort out these probs?
Thanks
Ben
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bowen Moursund
Sent: 16 January 2004 16:01
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
check on it and unfortunately it has come back as saying there are
vulnerabilities. I
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mircea Ciocan
Sent: 16 January 2004 16:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
Ben Ede wrote:
HI,
I've just set up xmail on a Redhat7.2 server. I've run a open relay
check on it and unfortunately it has
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Multisoft Solution wrote:
I am pretty new in XMail and I do testing in Linux RedHat 9.1
I got a message from our ISP that SPAMCOP told our XMail testing server has
become spammers server/open relay I guess.
Yesterday I close the open relay through a change at:
. If I would like to allow one IP, let say 205.100.10.1 so
SMTPRELAY.tab
205.xxx.xxx.1 TAB255.255.255.255ENTER ??
Thanks,
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:03 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM
Enviado el: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:19 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xmail] Re: Open Relay SPAM
Could you give me the example how to do it in detail?
Cause I want to make sure it safe, otherwise I would get another security
ticket from Spamcop.
Thanks,
Joe
- Original Message
You have:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0
and must be:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1
Gustavo
- Original Message -
From: Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 7:52 PM
Subject: [xmail] open relay
Ok,
I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:00 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
You have:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0
and must be:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1
Gustavo
- Original Message -
From: Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
, but the other tests
come back as open relay.
benny
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote:
Ok,
I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have
, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote:
Ok,
I have my smtprelay.tab file blank, and I have EnableAuthSMTP-POP3
0 in server.tab. I set my mail client for smtp auth and everything
works, and if I dont have smtp auth set it doesn't work(i get
That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208
-Original Message-
From: Benny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
=20
=20
=20
Here
: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
Here is the email I get from the test site http://abuse.net
-
This is a test of third-party mail relay, generated via
.
benny
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:26 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Benny wrote:
Here is the email I get from the test site http://abuse.net
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nombre de Benny
Enviado el: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 6:24 PM
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: [xmail] Re: open relay
You are right Seth, and of course that makes sense. But am I correct in
having:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP30
or should it be
EnableAuthSMTP-POP31
Alright thanks everyone for seeing my dumb mistakes :) And thanks for the
clarification on that Seth.
I appreciate the help.
benny
- Original Message -
From: Seth A. Munroe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:38 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
-Original Message-
From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steven Peck wrote:
=20
That IP Address is listed in two open relay databases.
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ip4r.ch?ip=3D24.94.213.208
=20
It does not look like that to me. The form
Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:51 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: open relay
-Original Message-
From: Davide Libenzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=20
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Steven Peck wrote:
=20
That IP Address is listed in two open relay
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 08:48 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
How are you testing it for relay?
Bill
--
From: Scott Dale Robison[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 09:34 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Open Relay
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Scott Dale Robison wrote:
I was testing by creating an alternate account in my client (but not on
the
server... [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I tried to email a message from
23 matches
Mail list logo