[xmail] Choosing XMail's group and umask

2005-06-15 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Hi Davide and list, a couple of weeks ago there was a little discussion on the list about the file permissions and creation masks. I was the one who answered: If you chmod your MailRoot 700, you don't have to care about these things. But now I ran into a problem: I want to grant some read

[xmail] Re: Disable mail loop eventlog entries

2005-06-15 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
Hello, | Can I suggest to be warning, not 'error' nor 'information' | .. I think it's more appropriate ... according to Windows architecture, the recommended meaning of events is that: Error is a critical failure, which disrupts (or most likely will disrupt) normal operation of server.

[xmail] Re: Disable mail loop eventlog entries

2005-06-15 Thread CLEMENT Francis
-Message d'origine- De : Michal Altair Valasek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoy=E9 : mardi 31 mai 2005 12:19 A : xmail@xmailserver.org Objet : [xmail] Disable mail loop eventlog entries =20 =20 give it a Error status. =20 Davide, may you please change the status to something

[xmail] Re: XMail Manager 1.0 Final - TOTAL FAILURE

2005-06-15 Thread Sergio Perrone
Tony Shiffer wrote: Mike; With the luck I normally have, it will be just me with the problem. ... ... Does anyone have the previous version installer for this program? Please help out if you do. Tony I´ve have that version, patch included. Total zip size is 3.7 Mb. If you need

[xmail] Re: RDNS and RBLsquestion

2005-06-15 Thread CLEMENT Francis
Using a rbl (and spamhaus is a good one) and others tools like RDNS, = GLST, AV, anti-spam, ... is not a problem IF you take care to advertise your = users (if possible before effective deployment date) and explain them = advantages and possible problems (and how to explain problem to their

[xmail] Disable mail loop eventlog entries

2005-06-15 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
Hello, every time Xmail detects a mail loop problem (which happens pretty often) it emits message to application event log, marked as Error. This is annoying me, because my system monitoring alerts me on failures. Discovered mail loop is normal working condition - not something which needs my

[xmail] UHHHHHHH STOP IT ! - RE: Choosing XMail's group and umask

2005-06-15 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Hi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:41 AM: [...] LOL - someone could assume that this is my personal PITA mailserver for Davide that sends out the mails every 2 weeks ;-)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to

[xmail] Re: UHHHHHHH STOP IT !

2005-06-15 Thread Francesco Vertova
At 11.29 15/06/05 +0200, you wrote: LOL - someone could assume that this is my personal PITA mailserver for If I remember well, this is the very same guy (or machine) who reinjected messages in the list a couple of weeks ago. From the header: Received: from mail pickup service by

[xmail] Re: delivery delaying

2005-06-15 Thread Helio Cavichiolo Jr
I started xmail with -Qn 512 and now the delivery is working fast. Thank you very much, Francis. Em Sex 10 Jun 2005 12:21, CLEMENT Francis escreveu: - First change -Qn parameter that define max number of threads used by smail module of xmail (smail is responsible to deliver local and outgoing

[xmail] mail loop back to myself

2005-06-15 Thread Lars
hi, i had set up a linux server (suse 9.1) with xmail. everything works fine, my mails sended by an external mailer come in and a mail localy sended (to an external mailadress or another then the sended-domain) finds the way out :-) BUT if i send a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: mail loop back to myself

2005-06-15 Thread =?ISO-8859-15?Q?S=F6nke_Ruempler?=
Lars wrote: hi, i had set up a linux server (suse 9.1) with xmail. everything works fine, my mails sended by an external mailer come in and a mail localy sended (to an external mailadress or another then the sended-domain) finds the way out :-) BUT if i send a mail from [EMAIL