[xmail] Mail box full

Hi! Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could Xmail deliver one short message to the users mbox when it responds mail box full. People manage to fill their mbox within 7 days with all sort of huge attachments. Matic - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

[xmail] Slow delivery of mail

Greetings, I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000 Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam check, one from post-data - virus scan). For the last week, I've been noticing that mail delivery is running about 4 - 6 hours later than

[xmail] Re: Slow delivery of mail

Hi Tracy, On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote: I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000 Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam check, one from post-data - virus scan). For the last week, I've been noticing that mail delivery is

[xmail] Message redirect (to spambox)

Hello, I have xmail set up on a linux box and I'm using spamassassin with Don Drake's filter to mark incoming messages as spam. Everything works great but what I would like to do is to put all incoming spam into a separate mailbox (e.g. spambox-at-mydomain.nl). How can this be done? I tried

[xmail] Re: Mail box full

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote: Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could Xmail deliver one short message to the users mbox when it responds mail box full. People manage to fill their mbox within 7 days with all sort of huge attachments. cron job, for each

[xmail] Re: Mail box full

yeah, I thought of that, but this would be quite an overhead compared to the check that actually has to be done before message is delivered Matic Davide Libenzi pravi: On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote: Is it possible to let users know when their mailbox is full - could Xmail deliver

[xmail] Re: Mail box full

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Matic wrote: yeah, I thought of that, but this would be quite an overhead compared to the check that actually has to be done before message is delivered That, BTW, would require extra bits to verify that the mbox-full message has been already dropped inside. - Davide

[xmail] Re: Slow delivery of mail

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Soenke Ruempler wrote: On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote: I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000 Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from pre-data - spam check, one from post-data - virus scan). For the last week,

[xmail] Re: Slow delivery of mail

On 27.10.2006 21:24, Davide Libenzi wrote: This stuff can be analyzed only in presence of detailed data. Without that, nothing can be done. Yes, Sir ;P -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ruempler.eu/ - To unsubscribe from this list:

[xmail] Email address reverse check

I'm having problems sending messages to some servers that do reverse check because XMail demands email addresses enclosure with . Is there a way to inhibit this need? Take a look on this chat: helo220-host1.northweb.com.br ESMTP Exim 4.52 #1 Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:22:29 -0200 220-We do not

[xmail] Re: Email address reverse check

From http://xmailserver.org/Readme.html#server_tab_variables [AllowNullSender] Enable null sender ('MAIL FROM:') messages to be accepted by XMail. _ Kirk Friggstad - Sysadmin / Database Admin IRON Solutions: 109

[xmail] Re: Slow delivery of mail

Resending because I didn't get an echo - not sure if it made it to the list... Tracy wrote: Soenke Ruempler wrote: Hi Tracy, On 27.10.2006 14:00, Tracy wrote: I'm running XMail 1.20 (I know, not the current version) on Windows 2000 Server (SP4). I have two filters that run (one from