[xmail] Re: config files discussion

2007-02-21 Thread Ivo Smits
Jeffrey Laramie wrote: On Tuesday 20 February 2007 12:32, Davide Libenzi wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb 2007, Dave Henderson wrote: Davide, Thanks for your reply. I can see your points. It was just a question I had as it seems alot of the daemons I use, use the apache style or a

[xmail] Small GLST bug maybe?

2007-02-21 Thread Henri van Riel
Hello all, I decided to give glst a try. Mostly out of curiosity 'cause I don't receive that much spam at all... yet... :( First, it took me a while to figure out how to pass the --cfg parameter to the glst binary but I've got that figured out now. At first I tried this in my

[xmail] Re: Small GLST bug maybe?

2007-02-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Henri van Riel wrote: Hello all, I decided to give glst a try. Mostly out of curiosity 'cause I don't receive that much spam at all... yet... :( First, it took me a while to figure out how to pass the --cfg parameter to the glst binary but I've got that figured out

[xmail] SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100) local error in processing

2007-02-21 Thread Bart Mortelmans
Hello all, I just installed XMailserver on a brand new machine running Fedora Core 6. I now get this error when trying to connect via SMTP: === 220 server.name.test [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.24 ESMTP Server] service ready; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:25:04 +0100 HELO something 451 Requested action

[xmail] Re: SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100) local error in processing

2007-02-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Bart Mortelmans wrote: Hello all, I just installed XMailserver on a brand new machine running Fedora Core 6. I now get this error when trying to connect via SMTP: === 220 server.name.test [EMAIL PROTECTED] [XMail 1.24 ESMTP Server] service ready; Thu, 22 Feb 2007

[xmail] Re: SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100) local error in processing

2007-02-21 Thread Bart Mortelmans
Duh!?! -100 is ERR_SHMAT and is never used in 1.24!?! Regretfully, this is what I'm getting as a result. I did a normal compilation from the source (make -f Makefile.lnx). The only strange thing I can think of (different from what I'm used to) is that this server uses RAID 0 for the

[xmail] Re: SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100) local error in processing

2007-02-21 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Bart Mortelmans wrote: Duh!?! -100 is ERR_SHMAT and is never used in 1.24!?! Ok, it's not ERR_SHMAT but ERR_NO_ROOT_DOMAIN_VAR. You're missing the RootDomain server.tab variable. I made a script to extract error codes, and that's the output ... - Davide 0 --

[xmail] Re: SMTP error: 451 Requested action aborted: (-100) local error in processing

2007-02-21 Thread Bart
I originally copied and pasted my server.tab from one terminal screen to an open vi in an other, assuming tabs would remain real tabs. It turns out that that isn#39;t the case and that tabs are translated to a couple of spaces with such a copy-paste... I changed the spaces into tabs and now get