At 15:19 5/30/2002 +0100, Lee Rich wrote:
After running several tests against the xmail server, I've noted that
messages sent to an invalid address don't seem to be replying and
informing the sender. Or for that matter, informing the postmaster account
that a message has been sent to an
At 15:00 6/5/2002 -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
status info, etc... also the server has to perform tasks that are not
usually done by a server ( like parsing mime files ) and this increase
also the cpu utilization.
Amen to that... I'm in the process of writing a web based client for
reading
else might be there...
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is it possible to enable extended logging? By this I mean having the log
files contain a transcript of the session for each session?
I need to track down some weird mails, and having a log containing all the
session information for each session would be helpful...
-
To unsubscribe from this
Set up a single mailbox and assign the * alias to that mailbox. That should
direct all mail into that single mailbox - and the original recipient
address will remain in place (I have a similar setup, and I use my mail
client to sort based on the original recipient address).
At 14:47 6/11/2002
PROTECTED]
The mail client has to be getting the original recipient somewhere, which
means it has to be preserved by XMail when the mail is redirected by the *
alias.
At 08:54 6/11/2002 -0400, Tracy wrote:
Set up a single mailbox and assign the * alias to that mailbox. That should
direct all mail
At 15:03 6/11/2002 +0200, Roman Dusek wrote:
I am getting quite the same headers - recepient's address
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is only deep inside Received:... header and in
To: header that can be hidden using Bcc. So where should the client
mailserver get the right address from?
Very right you
At 13:52 6/11/2002 -0500, Juan H. Medina wrote:
/var/MailRoot/bin/18849: No such file or directory.
Looks like you're missing a space between your XMail Bin folder and the PID
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I solved this by putting my local network into smtprelay.tab (which allows
me to send without authentication), then turning on:
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 1
in the server.tab file. Then I have all my external mail clients enable
SMTP authentication in their mail client software.
There may be
At 11:12 6/13/2002 +0200, Maarten Weyn wrote:
[02] The reason of the delivery failure was:
The maximum number of delivery attempts has been reached
This means that there was a message in the queue that was awaiting delivery
and it failed. IIRC, the default for delivery is to make 32 attempts
addresses, if I can
mark the addresses as invalid by doing so.
I'll take any suggestions.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, per chance, cached? If so, that might be
where I ran into problems before (this time I stopped XMail prior to
changing the setting)
Thanks.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
At 10:35 6/21/2002 +0800, Adrian Hicks wrote:
* Restart Xmail
* do: telnet localhost 6017 (the admin program gives the timestamp etc.
waits for input - all seems ok at this point)
* do: username password and hit enter
And I get a bad controller
Odd question, perhaps meaningless... Do you, by chance, have a * alias
specified for your domain (not for a user, but for the actual domain alias)?
At 17:34 7/1/2002 +0100, Phin Pope wrote:
Davide,
The curious nature of the problem is that everyone can access port 25 from
inside our network
At 16:20 9/20/2002 +, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
---
root@jeckyl:~# telnet . 6017
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to ..
Escape character is '^]'.
-00140 Server does not like Your IP
Connection closed by foreign host.
---
Check your
I have a class library I wrote in VB.NET which handles all this (including
using standard TCP to communicate - ie. not using external programs for the
communications with the server). It exposes everything as an object model,
and maps the object model to the underlying control commands.
It is
index was not working properly
- this is fixed.
The GetList function on the collection classes was broken - this is fixed.
Tracy
At 15:27 9/25/2002 +0200, Guillaume Devoyon wrote:
hello Tracy,
if you want i can do tests with you'r application..
Guillaume Devoyon
-Message d'origine-
De
Tell me an e-mail address to send to on that server, and I'll try to send
you an e-mail and see what error comes back...
At 15:40 9/29/2002 -0700, Michael Mehrle wrote:
I set up xmail as described yesterday but now, after my MX entries have
been switched over - messages never arrive (test
...:)
If you get this, then your server itself is working.
If not, well, we'll never know, eh? :)
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL
I've been playing around with writing one of these in .NET - but I haven't
gotten it working right yet... If I ever do, I'll put the source up
somewhere...
At 12:09 11/3/2002 -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Anyone that want to try to have this to work as an XMail filter :
Libenzi wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Tracy wrote:
I've been playing around with writing one of these in .NET - but I haven't
gotten it working right yet... If I ever do, I'll put the source up
somewhere...
Now I'm going in rant mode, so pls excuse me :
rant
Guys, why are you using stuff like
with that file and not look any farther,
even though there are no commands in there?
Thanks for any help on this.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message
At 18:01 6/5/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
The file is located at: http://www.arisiasoft.com/misc/ntauth.zip
Can you setup a simple HTML page and give me the link ? It is better to
have links to HTML pages instead of zip files directly.
Sure. You can link to
At 14:53 5/30/2003, Henri van riel wrote:
Try going in directly...?
telnet popserver 110
user full user name
pass password
list
quit
If that works, then the mail server is working, and the problem is with
your MUA
I already tried that with the same result:
I get '-ERR
At 11:29 6/3/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Cianferotti Leonardo wrote:
I have tried to raise smtp after pop3, shaping the following line: =20
EnableAuthSMTP-POP3 0 =20
I have then ablitato the authentication by smtp: =20
AllowSmtpVRFY 1 =20
Inolte I have added in the
Sorry for the new mail/thread, I lost the original when my mail client
crashed
Seems to me that if you just want to do authentication of POP3 and SMTP
user accounts, and you're running a single NT domain and mail domain, you
could do that easily enough using External Authentication. As I
At 17:45 6/3/2003, webmaster wrote:
I am not a programmer by any means so thats a little over my head, unless
you know where someone has already done this and they have scripts or code
to offer?
Well, I could set up a test domain locally and try it here... Probably be
tomorrow sometime before I
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: External Password Authentication
At 17:45 6/3/2003, webmaster wrote:
I am not a programmer by any means so thats a little over my head, unless
you know where someone has
At 01:13 6/4/2003, Wang Hu wrote:
I got same problems. See my message Can I make two or more pop3 =
connections
of XMail with same account concurrently? in this group.
It seems due to pop3-lock in XMail which allows only one pop3 session =
for
each account at the same time.
I don't know why
is formatted like the
rest, with a date in the file name). The format of the log file is:
Connecting IP Date/Time blocking maps domain
I have no objection if this code were to find it's way into the
distribution set for XMail...:)
Tracy
- - -
For posterity sake, here
At 13:09 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote:
Greetings,
I've heard a couple of people ask about logging for MAPS rejections, and I
found that I wanted such a feature myself - so I grabbed a copy of the 1.15
source and added it. Making these changes adds
At 14:37 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Tracy wrote:
True - but the SMTP log doesn't indicate which maps list was used to
block
the IP. Since I'm just starting to experiment with maps blocking, I
want to
see who's
At 15:09 6/11/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
1.16 will do SNDRIP=EIPMAP (%s) with %s == map-name
Coolness...:) I'll be a happy camper then - for a while at least...:)
Thanks...:)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
to just let
their server through without worrying about MAPS and/or RDNS?
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:50 6/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Is there a way to cause XMail to whitelist an IP address or address block
from MAPS/RDNS checking? I've got someone who runs a private mailing list
on their server, but doesn't have reverse DNS set up (actually, they did,
but their ISP messed it
At 13:59 6/12/2003, webmaster wrote:
[00] XMail bounce: [EMAIL PROTECTED];Error=[554- The IP address you are
using to connect to AOL is a dynamic (residential)
554- IP address. AOL will not accept future e-mail transactions from this
IP
554- address until your ISP removes this IP address from
At 17:16 6/12/2003, Michael Harrington wrote:
Honestly, can you blame AOL for doing this? I can't even count how much
SPAM gets thrown at our system from people using their cable or DSL lines.
No, I can't blame them for wanting to stop some of the spam. But one of the
best solutions I've seen
At 18:15 6/12/2003, Kirk Friggstad wrote:
For another example (just discovered this today at
http://www.mynetwatchman.com/kb/security/ports/17/137.htm - scroll down to
the False Positives section at the end) - on a Windows web server, if
Netbios is bound to the public IP address of the server, IIS
to local.schmoo.org and it would authenticate local users, and you
could use the regular authentication for web.schmoo.org.
I don't see any other way to handle it. Not to say there's not another way,
but
At 13:54 7/1/2003, webmaster wrote:
Tracy this works excellent for me thanks. I am now
At 19:42 7/10/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
So, I figured with the new whitelist option in smtp.ipprop.tab I'd be in
business. However, it doesn't appear to exempt an address from rDNS
checking, only from MAPS checking. Unless I'm doing something wrong.
Because the server I attempted to
At 20:15 7/10/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
It should be cought by this. Check the spelling of smtp.ipprop.tab and
be sure there's a newline after the last
Grrr I looked at it a dozen times, and I had even copied it into the
mail messages and was getting ready to send it when I noticed that
At 15:45 7/12/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
As I understand it, the parameter to HELO/EHLO is treated as a domain name,
and an MX lookup is done on that domain. If *any* MX record is returned,
processing continues. If *no* MX records are returned, then an A lookup is
done. If an A record is
This is forwarded from another mailing list
So the algorithm would become, I think:
Suppose the IP 1.2.3.4 identifies using HELO (or EHLO) as outmx.example.com:
1) Lookup MX records for outmx.example.com.
If the IP address of one of the returned MX hostnames is 1.2.3.4,
mark as DHVP
At 11:31 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
use mailproc.tab and redirect switch.
see the doc für details.
I set up relay succesfuly, for 3 different emails (1 is of an internal/local
domain, the other 2 are external domains accoutns) - the local user has got
the message, the other 2 - not. (I
At 11:53 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
Yes, a lot thx. Your XMail machine cannot fire DNS queries *or* the target
domain does not have neiher MX nor A records.
My machine IS a DNS server as well, and the MX/A records are valid (I'm sure
because I can connect them and retrieve mail on
At 12:35 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
Is that the way I should define it?
Here's my smtprelay.tab:
164.149.214.100 255.255.255.255
164.149.214.101 255.255.255.255
164.149.214.102 255.255.255.255
164.149.214.103 255.255.255.255
164.149.214.104 255.255.255.255
164.149.214.105 255.255.255.255
At 12:54 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
Which flavor of OS are you running? Your mention of ASP makes me think it
might be Windows. If so, try the following from a command prompt:
And see what you get back for each one. Again, using my own domain as an
example, your session might look
At 13:30 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
I have a user with a * alias. (aliases.tab = relaydomain.com * info)
I run the open relat test on: http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/
Server was accepting relay:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 OK
MAIL FROM:
250 OK
RCPT
At 13:55 7/14/2003, Michael Lugassy wrote:
I did get the final email, so in my case it's open relay.
Moreover, I personally believe that having then email received (but not
delieverd), is as bad.
When you use that test, are you sending the email to an address that is not
on your local server?
At 19:22 7/14/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307092300
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307102300
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307112300
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307122300
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307132300
/var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-200307142300
How does XMail do
At 07:39 7/17/2003, Christian Fuchs wrote:
smtp logs example:
xxx.xx xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 2003-07-03 01:04:24 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xx
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] S4C58F RCPT=OK 0
xxx.xx xx.xxx.xxx.xxx 2003-07-03 01:04:27 xx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xx
Windows, or *nix?
If Windows, go to a client machine and attempt to send/receive e-mail. See
what error the email client returns. That will likely lead you to the
problem (either a misconfigured email client or a DNS problem with name
resolution).
At 11:26 7/18/2003, Mitch Costilow wrote:
Greetings,
I was wondering - are comment lines supported in spammers.tab? I want to
add a line for each entry to identify the DNS name and reported message
counts so that I know which ones are short term entries and which ones
are long term entries
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list
At 11:24 7/21/2003, David Stebbings wrote:
cerbernet.co.uk seems to have no relationship with mailtrack.co.uk
C:\nslookup
Default Server: karen.arisiasoft.com
Address: 216.201.36.227
set type=mx
mailtrack.co.uk
Server: karen.arisiasoft.com
Address: 216.201.36.227
Non-authoritative
At 12:09 7/21/2003, David Stebbings wrote:
Very strange, using sam spade i get this:
Dig [EMAIL PROTECTED] (195.216.16.129) ...
Non-authoritative answer
Recursive queries supported by this server
Query for mailtrack.co.uk type=3D255 class=3D1
mailtrack.co.uk NS (Nameserver)
At 09:51 7/24/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
You are at UTC +10, that is -36000 for the timezone. That is fine. Your
system shows that daylight is enabled though. How the system does know ?
There's a configuration file (/etc/timezone in most Unix) that describe
timezone and daylight switch
At 10:08 7/24/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
However, I don't know of any way to configure the start and end dates of
DST for the Windows platform. I do know how to determine when the system
believes those changes occur, however, if that would be helpful... (I can
put together a simple C
At 10:54 7/24/2003, vin wrote:
I had never bothered putting an mx record for my server, because I seemed to
be getting mail fine without it and I seem to remember from a while back,
some discussion that under some circumstances, mx records are not needed.
then the people at my dad's hospital
At 04:38 7/24/2003, Rob Arends wrote:
But how do you determine WHEN to apply the daylight offset and WHAT is the
offset?
// TSInfo.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application.
//
#include stdio.h
#include windows.h
// there's probably a better way to handle this part
// but I was
At 23:27 7/24/2003, Rob Arends wrote:
Thanks for that.
I think the following mods are needed:
months[tz.StandardDate.wMonth],
changed to
months[tz.StandardDate.wMonth-1],
and
months[tz.DaylightDate.wMonth],
changed to
months[tz.DaylightDate.wMonth-1],
Actually, you are likely correct. The
At 23:39 7/26/2003, Rodger Cravens wrote:
I am needing a catch all account for x-mail, but do not know how to set it
up. I want this catch all account to get everything that is not slated for
another real account. I guess I must also ask, does the postmaster account
do this if setup as a mailbox
At 20:47 7/27/2003, Orion Productions wrote:
I have a catch-all alias on my info mailbox.
Now I want to EXCLUDE some names, so for example everything @ourdomain may
be delivered EXCEPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I do now is create a user test, and setting the mailbox size to 0.
But I would rather see
At 00:23 7/28/2003, Rob Arends wrote:
The big difference here, is that Outlook's block sender, still requires you
to download the mail. If Xmail blocks the mail, then the sender gets a
non-delivery report (and hopefully ceases sending) and the user does not
download (perhaps over 56k) the mail.
At 13:07 7/28/2003, William wrote:
In the filters dir, my domain.tab file contains the correct:
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe c:\xscanner @@FILE @@FROM @@RCPT
Retcode
Um... Did you consider replacing Retcode with the actual value you want
return (ie: 97)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
At 13:51 7/28/2003, William wrote:
Um... Did you consider replacing Retcode with the actual value you want
return (ie: 97)
Well, that is actually the proper entry. The filter itself is supposed to
contain the Retcode, I have tried 3 things:
1) example string#97
2) 97#example string
3) example
At 14:10 7/28/2003, William wrote:
c:\xscanner\xscanner.exe c:\xscanner @@FILE @@FROM @@RCPT 97
Well sunnuva gun, it works! Trapped my test email and kept it in the KEEP
dir
Make sure that you use the return code that is appropriate for your
situation - 97 is just the first one that came to
At 14:56 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
Why i want to do this, is because i have to recreate about 5000 users =
email addresses, and i still want them to receive mail from there old =
addresses, both the username and domain portion is altered.
I'm assuming you have a list of the old addresses
At 15:18 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
It s not in the same e-mail system, we are running for our main e-mail, =
calendar, workgroup, booking and so on, are we running Novells GroupWise. =
But the alias function in that product does not fullfill our needs; So we =
wanted to set xmail in
At 16:06 7/28/2003, Kenneth Mogensen wrote:
GroupWise has an odd way to handle aliases - and i works very wiered some =
times =20
The trick is here that both the username and subdomain are altered .. that =
will say the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
question.. should it be the netbios name of the domain or full
internal domainname.
ex.
netbios domain name. mshome
fulldomain name. mshome.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL
and completely compromised.
Tracy
At 01:33 8/17/2003, Stephen Wilson wrote:
This is authentication via NTLM right? If so then the domain refers to the
domain of Primary Domain Controller (PDC) where the global account resides.
However if you are attempting to authenticate with a stand alone NT server
to dig through bunches of netblocks to find them.
Any suggestions (other than editing the code and producing a custom version)?
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body
()) code to perform
this check by calling USmtpSpamAddressCheck(SMTPS.szClientFQDN)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Sunday 17 August 2003 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Blocking on RDNS?
Greetings,
I admit I
.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the attached file for details.
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/octet-stream
-- File: wicked_scr.scr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line
BTW, in case anyone is interested... I've called the people who run
RoomLinx twice now, and they still don't seem to get it... Theyve been
beating against my mail server for two days now (getting a 550 on every
attempt), but if I open the door to see what they're beating with, it's
mostly old
up the sobig is causing the traffic. Sobig
has its own built-in SMTP server to flood out email and doesn't rely on
anyone elses.
-MTH
- Original Message -
From: Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 5:40 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Thank you!
BTW
Been there, done that... Still have over 3200 connection attempts in the
last 36 hours...
At 11:07 8/21/2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
Tracy wrote:
BTW, in case anyone is interested... I've called the people who run
RoomLinx twice now, and they still don't seem to get it... Theyve been
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:35 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail
Bonjour Tracy,
Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:46:49 PM, Tracy wrote:
Does anyone have a recommendation for a virus scanner (not a filter
script,
the actual anti-virus program) for use
: (0xx11) 4412-0876
http://www.atinet.com.br
- Original Message -
From: Tracy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 2:46 PM
Subject: [xmail] OT: Virus scanner for Windows / XMail
Greetings,
Does anyone have a recommendation for a virus scanner (not a filter
been whitelisted for weeks.
Any ideas where to look?
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
C:\Documents and Settings\tracy
relays.osirusoft.com is unreachable - but XMail is still marking the
incoming connection as EIPMAP. And of course, this particular address is
only one of many that was so marked before I caught the problem. It was
even
At 14:34 8/26/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the last couple of days, I've had about 8 bounces for this (ENODNS),
even though the address has been whitelisted for weeks.
Any ideas where to look?
It does look very strange to me. The IP is looking fine inside logs, so it
is pretty much
At 14:41 8/26/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
XMail does a lookup of the reversed IP plus the MAPS server name. The only
way to have it to return a positive response is the host name :
209.119.0.109.relays.osirusoft.com.
to return a positive lookup.
Well, apparently someone poisoned the dns for
One more problem today, then I think I'll be able to give it a rest...:)
I've written a filter that I want to apply to outbound mail. I placed the
exe for the filter in the mailroot/bin folder, and added a .tab file to the
mailroot/filters folder for the filter. I also added an entry in
?
-tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tracy
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Filters.out.tab problem - filter never runs
One more problem today, then I think I'll be able to give it a rest
At 15:17 8/27/2003, webmaster wrote:
This does work to copy all incoming yes. I currently use it to store all
incoming, but would like to be able to make subfolders of usernames and have
the respective email go into the respective folder for easier archiving.
If you're willing to use the email
This is somewhat off-topic, in that it doesn't relate specifically to
xmail, but rather to an anti-virus filter that I am attempting to write.
I seem to be having problems with the munpack.exe program out of the XAV
filter that has been discussed here and is linked from the XMail homepage.
At 04:31 9/1/2003, Bill Healy wrote:
You have to uudecode the files after you unpack them. Do a search for
uudecode.exe or an unpack program that can handle .uue files. Then you
might have to uncompress the files if the AV program you are using can't
scan inside archives. If so check out PAext in
What is the actual order in which a particular mail message makes it
through the system? Is it:
SMTP Session
Filters
Mailproc
And assuming that's correct so far, what other steps does a message go
through during processing?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
At 13:51 9/4/2003, Davide Libenzi wrote:
What is the actual order in which a particular mail message makes it
through the system? Is it:
SMTP Session
Filters
Mailproc
And assuming that's correct so far, what other steps does a message go
through during processing?
Sort of.
I'm looking at doing some custom validation of the HELO parameter (ie.
modifying SMTPSvr.cpp code), and I need a bit of advice. I can see quite
plainly how to cause an error message to be sent back to the session, but I
can't see how to force the session to drop/disconnect. Is there a way to
At 10:29 9/9/2003, webmaster wrote:
Has anyone been using outlook xp and it pop up the password box a lot when
sending and receiveing? This happens quit often and I have to net stop
xmail and net start xmail to solve the issue.
Outlook is well known for putting up the password box any time
At 10:39 9/9/2003, Tracy wrote:
There used to be a way to log the mail server sessions in Outlook, but it's
been years since I've used it and I can't remember how to do it (not sure
if it's available in newer versions of Outlook either). Check the
documentation to see if you can find a way to log
At 16:02 9/15/2003, Mircea Ciocan wrote:
Now with the crazy success of the IMAP access ( now Courier, but soon
Xmail owns ;) I have this problem: the good old POP-before-SMTP is not
used anymore ( BTW. Davide, there will be something like
IMAP-before-SMTP when Xmail will have native IMAP
At 16:29 9/15/2003, Mircea Ciocan wrote:
| Checking that box will cause Outlook / Outlook Express to authenticate to
| your mail server (using whatever methods it knows about - at least one of
| which is supported by XMail because my out-of-house users do this) when
| attempting to send email.
|
|
At 16:34 9/15/2003, Rodolfo Schwarzenberg K. wrote:
[02] The reason of the delivery failure was:
550-Callback setup failed while verifying [EMAIL PROTECTED] 550-(result of
an earlier callout reused). 550-The initial connection, or a HELO or
MAIL FROM: command was 550-rejected. Refusing MAIL
test for HELO names against
spam-address.tab, and added my own server's IP address there because of the
number of entries in the SMTP log with my address as the HELO name. So this
is really just a better (more complete) version of that test.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
At 22:18 9/19/2003, Nick Marino wrote:
Can someone explain to me why email messages that are not even addressed to
me keep getting put in my mail box with Xmail server. This happens under
1.17. and 1.16.
here is a sample of the address in from and to address fields.
Sender: Internet Email
in the SMTP log:
karen.arisiasoft.com arisiasoft.com218.7.157.254 2003-09-20
05:43:41 ht-soft
AUTH=EFAIL:TYPE=LOGIN 0
Suggestions on where to look would be appreicated.
Tracy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
