On 17.06.2006 18:16, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Hey, you stole *my* line :)
*scnr*
I just answered it to provide you more time for developing new XMail
features ;P
-soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On 14.06.2006 17:43, Javier Navarro wrote:
Is it possible to disable CustMapsList for some domains only?
One of our clients wants to receibe everything (even spam).
Nope, no native possibility.
You can:
1) write your own SMTP filter that handles blacklists and whitelists
your client.
On 16.05.2006 14:52, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
Hello XMail'ers and Davide
Our xmail server configuration : W2000 Server SP4, Xmail 1.22 W32, Davide
glst, Henry avfilterpd (post-data scan), and no 'runtime' av scanner
activated
Some customers complains about no delivery of some incoming
On 17.05.2006 16:12, Cesar L. Meloni wrote:
Hello all!!
I have an XMail server 1.22 on Slackware 10.2. This in production
for 3 months.
But now it shows the following error when messages are sent:
421 [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] service not available (-19),
closing
On 23.04.2006 03:31, postmaster - networkoftheapes.net wrote:
Now that I've made my filter, I have a question: How is the client domain
generated? Is it something reported by the sending client software? For
example, most entries in my SMTP logs from @hotmail.com report my server
On 21.04.2006 11:09, postmaster - networkoftheapes.net wrote:
More info about the PHP mail settings are at
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ref.mail.php#ini.sendmail-path
sendmail_path cannot be set through your PHP scripts, only in php.ini or
httpd server config (PHP_INI_SYSTEM)
The PHP
On 21.04.2006 09:21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone else have problems with PHP mail() function not sending mail
with XMail sendmail? Or is it just me, messing up my server's
configuration? PHP safe_mode=On
Can you send mails from PHP with safe_mode=off?
-
To unsubscribe from this
On 23.04.2006 12:59, postmaster - networkoftheapes.net wrote:
Some user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is trying to claim
mail.networkoftheapes.net as it's client domain. Since I know they can't
be, I exit with a 19 failing the message and stopping filter processing. I
also give them a 550 invalid
On 16.04.2006 01:46, postmaster - networkoftheapes.net wrote:
The sources aren't the only place to change the structure of user mailboxes.
Look at the command line settings for Xmail.
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
But the question was:
Is it guaranteed that user
On 15.04.2006 15:50, Ulrich Petri wrote:
Yeah i understand that.
Is it guaranteed that user mailboxes are always in
$MAIL_ROOT/domains/domain/username/
?
Yes, as long as you don't change it in the sources ;-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of
On 17.03.2006 06:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I solved the problem by deleting all the handmade entries for the 2nd
domain and used CtrlClnt then it worked.
Actually it took me quite some time to figure out how to make a user who
is entitled to make changes via CtrlClnt, it was not
On 16.03.2006 20:38, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Em Quarta 15 Março 2006 16:05, Davide Libenzi escreveu:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
I created a program to authenticate, add, remove and edit mail users into
a mysql table using the userauth xmail feature. I was getting
On 06.03.2006 14:56, Dale Qualls wrote:
All I could find on the 'net had to do with possible timeout erros
(apparently this is what the -97 means).
spamd is running but it almost seems like SA isn't answering when it's
called by the filter.
Any thoughts off the top of your heads?
Maybe
Hi,
On 06.02.2006 20:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Authentication can override CustMapsList is you set the flag '0' and the
user authenticate.
Yeah I guess he want's something receipient based, and not sender-based.
ATM that's only possible with an own smtp filter and some own logic in
it. :)
-
On 17.01.2006 20:58, Thomas Bresson wrote:
It makes no difference. I still just get:mail root path not found
Please read the mails carefully if you want to get free support for an
open source product:
I need to see the whole output of `netstat -a -n -t -p` (from root) in
order to help you.
On 11.01.2006 18:30, Leonardo Fogel wrote:
Take a look on the logs: $XMAIL_ROOT/logs/
They'll give some hints.
Or start XMail in debug mode: -Md command line parameter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On 30.12.2005 20:42, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
SpamCop is blocking servers based on misdirected bounces. SpamCop wants
all legit email servers to suppress bounce messages. Is there any way to
prevent XMail from sending nondelivery messages? I realize this violates an
RFC, but SpamCop is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:21
AM:
Haha, yes, this is what I need, have you ever tried to open a folder
with explorer and move 5k or 10k files around?
flamewar
That's the reason why I don't use GUI systems as server :)
/flamewar
Try with cmd.exe or total
On 12.12.2005 22:34, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
I have 87000 mails in my mailbox, but I cannot fetch them, no matter
which client I try, it doesn't finish the download. Is there some sort
of limit or timeout which I need to redefine so it can succeed?
Did you try telnet? ;-)
But in this case i
On 08.12.2005 05:07, Dale Qualls wrote:
My brother posted this question a while ago and we're still searching
for a solution. We've been using xmail since 1.17 and never really
noticed this issue until recently.
Please try deleting everything from the que:
# cd spool
# find -type f -exec
).
Use the whitelist feature:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#smtp_ipprop_tab
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Sönke Ruempler
Technik
top concepts Internetmarketing GmbH
Am Steinkamp 7 - D-21684 Stade - Germany
http
On 21.11.2005 14:11, Daniel Cabezas wrote:
After a very strange crash in my mailserver, for which the weekly backup
didn´t help much to recover the lost messages, I aask myself if is there any
way to make a filter, or rule to make a copy of all the emails that are sent
to my server to a copy
On 21.11.2005 23:04, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Is there a way to automatically block a sender IP address after he/she tried
to deliver more than (for example) 10 consecutive messagens to email
addresses that doesn't exist on server in a given elapsed time?
I think it would be a good
On 19.11.2005 18:49, Helio Cavichiolo Jr wrote:
Is it possible to anyone (those who are not in the list) send mail to the
list?
I think what you want is mailproc.tab and `redirect' command, no mailing
list. please check the online manual for more information.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 08, 2005 6:41 PM:
I dunno exactly what RFC says about that. I guess the hostname
domain.net. is valid, but i have no idea how this DNS issue should
be treated in SMTP.
FYI: Sendmail ignores the trailing dot. Maybe XMail should treat it like
On 09.11.2005 13:10, Francesco Vertova wrote:
I think XMail should consider domain.net and domain.net. as
equivalent in handling local domains (without having to add lines in
domains.tab or aliasdomain.tab).
ACK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body
On 08.11.2005 18:17, Francesco Vertova wrote:
if I have domain.net in domains.tab and send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the final dot), domain.net. is not
recognized as local, which leads to a mail loop. Can anybody confirm this?
Confirmed. If your Mailserver has it's IP or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, November 01, 2005 9:54 PM:
Is there a way to configure XMail to reject the incoming mail if the
smtp filter fails to execute for whatever reason and thus failing to
return exit code 3?
No XMail-native chance. Maybe a simple shell script as wrapper could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:40
AM:
if !aex means don't run this filter if the user is Auth'ed,
Yes
Shouldn't aex mean only run this filter on Auth'ed users ?
No
Maybe it should or could, but atm it doesn't. :]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:59
AM:
My question originates from a win2000 server problem when it was
failling to crate any new proccesses, thus it wouldn't also
be able to
create a wrapper script to check for valid filter return code. The
real problem was in
On 26.10.2005 18:05, DOLIST Technical Center wrote:
I was just asking to help if needed. We run several XMAIL servers here
without any of this problems, sending more than 22 millions mails per
month like a charm.
And I thought I was a hardcore user ... :]
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On 26.10.2005 20:45, Alexander 'xaitax' Hagenah wrote:
Have look at the patcher[1] and do your job. Rebooting is required.
Might not be the best solution if this is a productive server.
I don't think it has something to do with the tcp limit. His problem is
too many threads, not too few. :]
On 20.10.2005 17:33, Midnight Oil wrote:
We do have MAIL_ROOT defined in the startup script:
XMAIL_ROOT=/xmail/MailRoot
XMAIL_ROOT ?
try:
export MAIL_ROOT=/xmail/MailRoot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 20.10.2005 17:51, Midnight Oil wrote:
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Sönke Ruempler wrote:
On 20.10.2005 17:33, Midnight Oil wrote:
We do have MAIL_ROOT defined in the startup script:
XMAIL_ROOT=/xmail/MailRoot
XMAIL_ROOT ?
try:
export MAIL_ROOT=/xmail/MailRoot
On 15.10.2005 13:50, Dick van der Kaaden wrote:
Davide,
What you think about a version of sendmail that has an option to use the
From:
header address as smtp mail from. Do you envision any problems with this?
The thing is that the current behavior does not work well in the shared
On 07.10.2005 00:20, Liam wrote:
I wish to add some sort of shaping to XMail. Currently, my server
resides on a 512/512k connection, which is also shared with a
business premesis. When an attachment is sent/received, XMail maxes
out the connection while it does its thing. Is there any way
On 12.09.2005 10:19, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
This is a real newb question I am asking so please bear with me.
I have setup Xmail and dbmail-imapd and everything is fine. My question
has more to do with aliases
on the Xmail side of things. Does Xmail resolve address aliases *before*
On 09.09.2005 11:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 9.9.2005 schrieb Adrian Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You might consider using stunnel. I think it's available for Windows
(definitely for GNU/Linux).
Yes it is!
Can be found here:
http://www.stunnel.org/download/binaries.html
But using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, September 09, 2005 12:16
PM:
Am 9.9.2005 schrieb Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
works for wrapping every tcp connection :)
I know that. But did u try it out?
There are lots of sites in the wild, where troubles are explained
using Stunnel.
Yes i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, September 08, 2005 11:56
AM:
um, I tried RTFM'ng but where can i see xmail related error
messages? I cant find it in /var/log/messages...
1. Enable logging via command lind switches:
http://www.xmailserver.org/Readme.html#command_line
2. Restart
On 08.09.2005 17:54, Dan Porter wrote:
I want to set up a filter so that all emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will
not get processed by the other filters (spam checker, virus checker).
I have never written my own filter, but I am guessing I need to do
something like this:
In filters.in.tab:
On 08.09.2005 22:13, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
pft please you think I have not done that already?
I have spamassassin installed already.
Cant figure out how to hook it to xmail in case you failed to read
through my post.
Next time link me to something useful other than a google
On 08.09.2005 22:33, Digerati Isabaddass wrote:
Well thank you. I will work on it some more. I have now a filter and
tab in place, but it says to be sure that spamd si running and I have
no way of knowing how to start it or what not.
I have no experiences with windows servers, so the only
On 07.09.2005 19:57, Jeff Buehler wrote:
I could find no reference to this anywhere - I occasionally have senders
that send, and the email does not stop sending, like a SPAM bomb, but
these are valid senders. I assumed the first couple of times that it
was something in the remote server
On 07.09.2005 22:08, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Just to be clear, the senders in this case are sending to my local
users. So, these are emails to my users that continue sending and
sending until I finally either contact the sending ISP or block the domain.
The SMAIL and SMTP logs simply show
On 02.09.2005 17:07, Davide Libenzi wrote:
In the hotmail case, that sure has DNS configured like it should, the MX
resolution is not a problem (like you can see from the logs posted). The
End of stream data error, is something you linked to problem in the link
between XMail and the
On 02.09.2005 19:13, Jeff Buehler wrote:
What would you look for in a tcpdump like this? I am technical (years
of c/c++/PHP/Perl programming) but I am clueless about tcpdumps...
pardon my ignorance!
You can see where the tcp traffic breaks. Maybe special characters
involve that (think of
Hi,
I agree. After all, that style is the today tendency.
However, here another idea:
http://www.fonsy.com/XMail_IAN88x31.2.jpg
http://www.fonsy.com/XMail_IAN88x31.3.jpg
Please note: This is no logo contest!
_PLEASE_ let the logo as it is: http://www.xmailserver.org/logoxmail.gif
We
On 25.08.2005 08:53, Harald Schneider wrote:
Too much white space on the left and the word Server should be
readable. Since most website owners don't like big banners, we should
stick to the standard button size.
Mhm i took the size from your forum. And I used the official XMail logo
from
On 25.08.2005 16:44, Rob Arends wrote:
I wouldn't get stressed about reading the word 'server' at smaller
dimensions.
Yes, I think so, too. powered by and XMail should be readable. And
the logo should stay the same!
As I'm not an artist, I'll give suggestions so that those of you who are,
On 25.08.2005 18:06, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
Maybe you prefer the updated one:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
And:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail_2.png (92x35)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 25.08.2005 18:14, John Kielkopf wrote:
Try lightly applying a sharpen filter.
Done (on the logo). Was to much rezising :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in the body of a
On 25.08.2005 18:13, Harald Schneider wrote:
Ok .. Mail Server is not that vital. Up to now, this one is my fav:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
Feel free to use it. It's Macromedia Fireworks PNG (with vector
information etc). If you want it as plain PNG/GIF/whatever, drop me an
email.
On 22.08.2005 17:46, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Ok, let's have a 'Powered by XMail Banner' context, with votes from the
mailing list ;)
So yesterday some temperature knocked out myself. ;)
Here it is:
http://regelt.com/powered_by_xmail.png
Different sizes are no problem. :)
--
Regrards,
Hi Harald,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Monday, August 22, 2005 11:40 AM:
Help to promote XMail by putting this powered-by button on your site:
http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=2692
Link it directly with xmailserver.org
This is the official 'Support XMail' banner? Or is
On 22.08.2005 12:01, Harald Schneider wrote:
Let's say this one has Davide's OK. Feel free to post alternative ones ...
I'll do so tonight :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
On 08.08.2005 15:59, Leonardo Fogel wrote:
Sorry for the delay. It resolves (PTR record) to the
hostname (FQDN) of the local IP address (10.0.1.20),
which is equal to the HeloDomain value.
Many thanks for the reply.
That's pretty normal. There is no way to change that but I really don't
On 05.08.2005 21:16, Leonardo Fogel wrote:
Although I've set the HeloDomain variable in
server.tab, XMail (IP 10.0.1.20) is still doing
reverse lookups (10.0.1.2 is the dns):
# tcpdump -n -p udp port domain
. IP 10.0.1.20.58871 10.0.1.2.domain PTR?
20.1.0.10.in-addr.arpa. (40)
On 04.08.2005 18:06, Manuel Martin wrote:
Hello Davide, hello list,
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=1) would be very
helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
On 02.08.2005 16:46, Kevin Williams wrote:
I must be missing something here, but I don't see it. I have a mailing
list, and one member says they can't send to the list. XMail bounced the
message with this reason:
553 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender address rejected: not logged in
As
Hi Eric,
On 18.07.2005 20:38, Eric Garnice wrote:
I have an XMail server in front of an Exchange server solely doing
SpamAssassin. A problem arises where missed spam is sent to a bogus user on
the domain where the from address is a valid distribution group on the same
domain. The
Hi Jeff,
On 17.07.2005 22:53, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Does anyone know of an existing solution for the auto-deletion of
undeliverable messages in XMail? I am running FreeBSD.
Writing something to remove them all periodically would be pretty easy,
but I would like something that allows a
Jeff,
On 17.07.2005 23:10, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Thanks, Sönke -
I was hoping to keep them in the queue for awhile, but I am collecting
500 or more undeliverables a day presently since I am forwarding to a
domain that is getting heavily spammed.
When spammers send spam to bogus users at
On 15.07.2005 21:31, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi everyone -
I am running XMail 1.21 on FreeBSD 5.4 - everything runs great. However,
although HeloDomain is set (to mail.buehlertech.net and
mail2.buehlertech.net) my greeting remains, for example,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. I assume the prefix is
On 15.07.2005 22:48, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi Sönke -
Thanks for your reply -
Presently my [SmtpServerDomain] is set to buehlertech.net, does it
require the prefix (i.e. mail or mail2.buehlertech.net)?
Yes is does. That value is exactly what you wanna change. But it isn't
the HELO domain!
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, July 08, 2005 2:20 AM:
Thanks for your help, I am still kind of confused to what you
are referring
to. Right now I have an open mailing list with staff members
in it. What I
want to accomplish is that when a Internet user mails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it
On 08.07.2005 09:25, Martin Schmid wrote:
It says that the header must be kept intact. This does not say wheter or
not it is allowed to modify it. And I'm modifying it (new rcpt to).
Obviously these changes are discarded, even though I replace the
original spool file by a completely
On 08.07.2005 02:19, Kieran Westergard wrote:
Thanks for your help, I am still kind of confused to what you are referring
to. Right now I have an open mailing list with staff members in it. What I
want to accomplish is that when a Internet user mails [EMAIL PROTECTED] it
delivers to all
On 08.07.2005 11:27, Martin Schmid wrote:
My problem is, that there are no smtp sessions for the incoming mail.
It's all done by psync (pop3). If I'm not completely wrong, there is no
post-data event for these mails. And it seems anything later than that,
the header is not re-read.
PSYNC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, July 07, 2005 2:16
AM:
Maybe its some sort of security related bug in Thunderbird
that allows
it to authenticate across 2 different IP's?
Are you sure that TB does not send SMTP auth? What tell the SMTP logs?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On 06.07.2005 19:41, Kieran Westergard wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could tell me how I would go about setting up a
distribution list in xmail. I want it so that all mail sent to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will get sent to all users I have defined. I tried
achieving this with a mailing list
On 06.07.2005 20:59, Jeff Buehler wrote:
Nah! ASSP (anti spam smtp proxy) is actually a great opensource
anti-spam proxy tool that (as it tunrs out) runs under Linux, FreeBSD
and Windows. It loads a specified number of bytes of a given mail then
refuses the connection based on a
On 05.07.2005 21:57, Dale Qualls wrote:
Anyone running 1.21 (or any flavor I guess) on Suse Pro 9.3? Any
gotchas (as in the RH8 v RH9 gotchas)?
XMail runs here with any glibc 2.3 Version on Fedora Core 2-4. So I
don't think there are any issues on this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, June 29, 2005 10:58
AM:
I have set quotas in my user's users.tab file but it doesnt
seem to work. I verified it by making MaxMBSize= 4096. but
my mailbox size now is at a whopping 10456.1. I've also tried
setting it to 0 but i can still receive mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:50
AM:
hi,
is there someone who could help me in german?
It seems that your sendmail binary is from qmail and not XMails. Look at
the instructions here:
http://www.ubaight.com/xmail/BeginnersGuide.html#SendmailScript
--
-
To
Hi Davide and list,
a couple of weeks ago there was a little discussion on the list about
the file permissions and creation masks. I was the one who answered: If
you chmod your MailRoot 700, you don't have to care about these things.
But now I ran into a problem: I want to grant some read
Hi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:41
AM:
[...]
LOL - someone could assume that this is my personal PITA mailserver for
Davide that sends out the mails every 2 weeks ;-))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to
Hi Davide and list,
a couple of weeks ago there was a little discussion on the list about
the file permissions and creation masks. I was the one who answered: If
you chmod your MailRoot 700, you don't have to care about these things.
But now I ran into a problem: I want to grant some read access
NOTA Postmaster wrote:
It's not an active authentication. The script I created only dumps the
Xmail users once and creates Apache user and group files. I set mine to
run as a cron job every 48 hours so it picks up changes.
The only overhead involved is the script running via cron every 48
NOTA Postmaster wrote:
I posted this a little bit back, but the list was down.
I wrote a PHP command line util for *nix boxen that will output Xmail as
Apache AuthUsersFile and AuthGroupFile format files for use with
..htaccess. If you enough people are interested, I'll clean up the code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is going crazy! Please stop it!
Received: from arsenet-princip.ArSeNet-LasRozas.local
([212.85.32.32]:32011)
by xmailserver.org with [XMail 1.21 ESMTP Server]
id S181C2D for xmail@xmailserver.org from
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
Tue, 31 May 2005 07:53:45 -0700
Hi David,
David Lord wrote:
On FreeBSD I've wanted local users to be able to access their own
directories so have these users all in xmail group and their own
directories owned user:xmail. This allows for local mail to be via
xmail. I'm not too experienced with permissions settings so may
Leonardo Fogel wrote:
Hi.
From the syslog I've read:
. XMail[1959]: Filter error (-5): Sender =
Please, does it mean time out?
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help
Hi Davide,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Saturday, May 28, 2005 6:57 PM:
Because many users have problems while fetching their mails (messages
too big, messages with nullbytes) and these things and a support
user needs to see what is inside the mailboxes.
=20
Why not having the support user,
Hi Davide,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, May 26, 2005 8:08 PM:
Any hints, thoughts or other ideas on this topic?
=20
Why do you need to peek inside the mailboxes?
Because many users have problems while fetching their mails (messages
too big, messages with nullbytes) and these things
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Friday, May 27, 2005 2:58 AM:
On Thu, 26 May 2005, John Kielkopf wrote:
=20
Have a strange problem here.
=20
Users that have Norton Internet Security or Mcafee Spam Killer
active have trouble with mail clogging up their systems from time to
time. Disabling the
Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
Hello,
Xmail v1.21 on a slackware linux v10.1 box.
Works fine. Only the timestamps are not right.
When someone sends a message from the domain to the same domain, the time is
wrong.
Say, 20.15 real time but when the message gets received, the timestamp is -2
Jeffrey L. Conley wrote:
Yes I know, that is not the problem unless I have the setting too high. I
really need to know why xmail dosent reject the oversized email.
As long as the size of the messages inside the mailbox is smaller than
your MaxMbSize, XMail will accept incoming messages.
Javier Navarro wrote:
Now I am using SMTP after POP3 authentication and my question is: Will my=
customers be able to send mail using 0 code (CustMapsList=
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org:0) from a banned IP?
Yes - see the manual:
``0''
the connection is kept alive but only authenticated
Sergio Perrone wrote:
You should set up SMTP-RDNSCheck variable in server.tab in order to
do that check.
Yes but only hosts without RDNS are refused. Host with any RDNS (even if
it's only 119.64-127.38.174.200.in-addr.arpa) won't get refused.
--
soenke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 10:15 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Francesco Vertova [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The (unrelated) question is: a ListSender[tab] in user.tab sets an
empty MAIL FROM: in delivering to ML users without changing the mail
headers (much like NoSenderBounce in server.tab and unlike
On Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:05 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Spyros Tsiolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I have quite a serious problem today.
I have a box with xmail v1.20 serving my company and a couple of
client domains.
Today I came to the office to find out that the mailbox is consuming
On Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:21 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Javier Navarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Last days I configured XMail 1.20 - W2K to make some custom maps
checking but I think something is wrong since I think I'm receiving
the same spam.
My server.tab CustMapsList line is:
On Thursday, April 28, 2005 7:45 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Javier Navarro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are no EIPMAPS in my smtp logs :-(
EIPMAP - without 's' - just to be sure ;)
If still nothing, try to use one blacklist first, double check syntax and if
possible use DNS Smarthost (because XMail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, April 20, 2005 1:22
PM:
Great pleasure to present the german Kardinal Ratzinger as
the new pope.
Especially to Davide.
No Italian - a german did it. ;)
=20
And next yeah, we'll win the FIFA World Cup. In the final match we'll
beat Italy, too. xD=20
=20
Hi Harald,
On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 7:17 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Harald Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if binding to an outgoing IP can be forced on application =
level.
There is an option for sendmail which seems to do exactly this:
-
ClientPortOptions
This option is
On Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:32 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Tony Shiffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are possible causes for an error 232?
We have users getting this error when communicating with one domain.
Xmail docs are vague in this regard.
Please give us an exact error message.
- what are you
On Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:58 PM [GMT+1=CET],
Charlie Qualls [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there Group,
I'm using xmail 1.21 and the bat as a client. I'm having problems
with mail not being delivered to the all the addresses in the list.
This list is a internal mail list going through
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 9:26
PM:
My smptrelay.tab is:
127.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
80.19.15X.XXX 255.255.255.248
=20
The 80.19.15X.XXX is a different IP from the mail server. This is the
intranet IP.=20
Then I guess you are sending from dialup/dynamic IP. Many
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 10:12
AM:
At 00.55 06/04/05 -0700, you wrote:
=20
Can _NOT_ be modified while XMail is running (And shouldn't be
edited by hand - use the CTRL Admin Protocol instead):
=20
aliases.tab
aliasdomain.tab
domains.tab
extaliases.tab
1 - 100 of 582 matches
Mail list logo
