Greetings;
Have I missed something here? I've been monitoring this list as a xmail
server user since version 1.2 - simply the best email server we have ever
encountered.
Has something happened to Davide? I know there has been no updates from him
in some long time - I hope that he is well. He
We do exactly these very things, using filters as Davide suggests.
We give each user the chance to change their settings via web interface.
But in the case of some domains, things like virus checks are preferred to
be turned on or off at the DOMAIN level, not the USER level. The current
logic of
We have ALWAYS had to make those DIR manaually. Xmail has never made them
for us. Only the numbered ones does it make.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Arends [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 8:36 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Error message since updating to
This conversation seems to have died - but is important.
How many of us currently use:
\domain\mailproc.tab
How many of us currently use:
\user\mailproc.tab
For those that do - please comment on this thread. I beleive the logic in
the present mail.proc is less usable than it could be. Your
mailbox line in domain mailproc.tab would be the logical Stop as it
delievers the mail. If no mailbox line found in domain mailproc.tab, then
continue processing with user mail.proc.tab.
Any one else?
- Original Message -
From: Manuel Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Absolutely correct. We need to turn some things on or off at the domain
level (for all in the domain), but still other filters must be run on
individual basis.
As long as mailbox is not encountered in the domain mailproc.tab,
processing should continue with the user mailproc.tab.
There are LOTS
This may explain a problem we have been having. Please say again if my
understanding is correct.
If you have a a mailproc.tab in the domain dir, then NONE of the
individuals mailproc.tab's for that domain will even be processed?
Please say it isn't so.
Tony
- Original Message -
From:
I have more data - It seems important. I have verified this behavior on 2
completely different boxes, and its absolutely consistent. (Win2KServer,
fully patched)
When the filter returns a value of Zero, or say, 2 - it only runs once. BUT
when the filter returns a 6 - its runs TWICE. Please
If you have one line in filters.in.tab and one line in the corresponding
..tab file, the filter will run *once* per message (iif the message is
being delivered locally). The message is removed from the memroy queue
while delivering, so if you see simultaneous filter invocations, they come
Davide;
Here is the output from the debug you did ask for. ONE SINGLE EMAIL was
received. There are NO other filters in filters.in.tab. Filters.out.tab is
empty. What can I try next?
Debugging XMail Server.
SMAIL thread [00] started
SMAIL thread [01] started
SMAIL thread [02] started
SMAIL
The destination ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not handled locally. Also,
filters.in.tab is set only for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So - I have no filters.out.tab, so outbound to [EMAIL PROTECTED] should
not be tripping a filter.
This behavior happens the same if I return a zero as well, or any other
return, or
Thats a GREAT idea. Perhaps you could parse the virus name into the email
as well. We did this with our previous AV system, and it worked very well
for us. Unfortunately, a script-based solution is much slower, and demands
to much overhead for the volume of mails being scanned.
Tony
-
Jason - I'm surprised there wasn't a burst of feedback on the list about
formatting mail. I am no expert, but there has been much discussion here
about that, and the RFC's that govern their structure. I imagine you are
thinking of dropping your notices into the xmail local pickup directory -
I *Knew* as soon as I sent that message I would figure it out. Nevermind
..
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:35 PM
Subject: [xmail] XAV Silently Fails
I hope you will help me understand what is not working with
Would you be willing to share you configuration settings for Norton
Corporate AV and xmail?
- Original Message -
From: RaveRod [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: XMail Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:08 AM
Subject: [xmail] XAV sending multiple error emails.
Hi! I'm
We also have this issue. cfgfileget/cfgfilset works, but makes things very
clumbsy to work with.
- Original Message -
From: Sönke Ruempler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:34 PM
Subject: [xmail] filter feature request
davide,
i suggested a
I have tried looking through the archives, and the manual, and all the
resource links - and find only one xmail log report script - and I cant seem
to make it return any results.
Has anyone script files that work to report on the xmail log files?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
No problemo - one minute ...
- Original Message -
From: Shawn Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:04 PM
Subject: [xmail] Re: XMAIL Logs
Would you mind sending me a sample output and one or your logs?
-Original Message-
Is there some reason the mail list in xmail wont work for your application?
- Original Message -
From: Rob G
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:33 PM
Subject: [xmail] lisset.pl
Hi,
I found this pl file on the website. Now how do I get it to run.
Their dial up ISP is probably blocking port 25. Add an alternate port (something
other than 25) to xmails bindings, and configure the email program to connect on the
alternate port.
Tony
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Thats the only message from xmail I have even seen that didnt have a number in front
of it - I wasn't sure what to make of it. If their are filters running, they have
been running without change all along. Also, later on, the message seems to actually
have gotten through without this unusual
I had a user report this result when sending to known valid and functioning xmail.
The message doesn't like like one from xmail to me - but I don't know what to make of
it.
Failure Reason
Message rejected by server filters
/Failure Reason
We don't run any filters of this type.
-
To
Excellent! We have the same problem - and this will fix it in a snap. Thanks Davide
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Real account
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Edinilson J. Santos wrote:
We use scripts written by Edinilson J. Santos . You can find them at:
http://www.atinet.com.br/xmail
We use his AV, and autoreply. They work very well for us.
- Original Message -
From: Søren Knudsen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:49 PM
A user wants to use sendmail (instead of typical win32 methods) to send emails. I
have no experience with configuring win32 to use sendmail. How do I go about setting
it up for use on a win32 system? Anybody?
- Original Message -
From: Gerrit P. Haase
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And not All admnistrators have the skills, or care to be programmers. Having at least
a document with these errors would have saved hours and hours and hours over the last
year(s) of working with xmail. It seems that it's better to make thousands of
administrators struggle through the
I know I have seen this on this list before, but cannot find it in my saved files.
A user is trying to make Eudora work. I remeber there is an aalternate formatting
required in Eudora, and that xmail has a reserved deliminator for this, but I can't
remeber what it is.
can Anybody help?
Edinilson - have you been working on your relay tab? Seems I can't send to you any
more. Or perhaps you did this on purpose? :)
Tony
- Original Message -
From: websyscon.net PostMaster
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 4:43 PM
Subject: Error sending message
Thank your Mr. Santos!
After your recommended test, here is the results.
The mail file was copied to the created dir in avfilter as expected. The
virus attachment was extracted, and in the same DIR. (I rem'd the code that
deletes this temp file and dir so I could better track the results of
New, more information.
On more testing, the last statement in avfilter.bat that I can verify is
being run sucessfully is uudecode. If I run the line which invokes AVG by
hand (substituting values for %2), it runs correctly, and creates the report
in the \avfilter\temp directory.
Tony
-
I had certainly checked and rechecked. Still - you were correct. The directory and
file deletions in avfilter\temp were not being done due to a path problem! Also,
without any more changes - the report file is now being created in the temp dir as
expected! Closer than ever to sucess.
The
Edinilson;
Here is the report created for an infected file:
AVG 6.0 Anti-Virus System
Copyright GRISOFT Inc. 2001
Program version 6.307, database version 168
Command line: [/HEUR c:\xxmail\mailroot\avfilter\1008279248678.401.defiant\*.* /REPORT
That was it friends! All is working as is should, and the offending email is deleted.
Thank you for the help! Edinilson, if you make a fix that is different, please tell
us about it. Also, do you want me to send you the infected email?
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Edinilson
That looks far better than my quick hack. I would like to wait and use whatever
Edinilson uses, so as to avoid forking. Forking is bad. (as Davide tells us often!)
Thanks for the very clear suggestions. If Edinilson does not make an update, I will
use your reccomendation.
:)
Tony
-
I do not have success with these scripts. Can anyone help? It seems the
AVG engine ins't making the temp file - or something in that area. ANyone
please?
Tony
- Original Message -
From: Edinilson J. Santos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 4:13 AM
It seems that mail will be delivered to a mailbox even if it is over quota,
if that mail is delivered as part of a mailing list. Has anyone else
noticed this?
Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help:
Ok -It's fixed. My foolishness as usual. Reg entry for xmail.exe was
wrong. Thanks for your help.
- Original Message -
From: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: XMail mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 10:39 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Spool Directory
On
37 matches
Mail list logo
