Re: Xorg Cross Compiling

2010-10-29 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:45:59AM -, Harsha Sukeerthi wrote: /usr/local/arm-2010q1/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/4.4.1/../../../../arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/ld: r300_dri.so.test: hidden symbol `__sync_sub_and_fetch_4' in

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Deprecation of xf86-video-nv

2010-03-30 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:33:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: this limits nvidia driver usage to specific libc implementation, with specific version. glibc is kind of the de facto libc. What do you expect here? Them not to link to the C library? Provide a second binary linking against

Re: what is XF86VM?

2009-08-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 05:24:43PM +0800, kedahanzi wrote: Dear everyone, what is XF86VM? Extension to change the video mode of the server. Consider games that want to use a lower resolution for full screen operation. Joerg ___ xorg mailing list

Re: X.org release engineering?

2009-06-09 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:20:00PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: Security is handled out of band like any other project. We'll release patches for at least the most recent release, probably do a point release for same, and anyone shipping anything older gets to backport. In practise, this didn't

Re: X.org release engineering?

2009-06-09 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 08:13:03AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Assuming you mean http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXfont/commit/?id=5bf703700ee4a5d6eae20da07cb7a29369667aef the patch is available from git, like all other changes. See earlier part about following git history :) I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.7.0

2009-04-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:47:14AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: (b) Xv doesn't crash the Xserver any more, which is good. When xcompmgr is running, it doesn't show the video though (black window). I take that partially back. With DRI disabled, Xv still crashes the X server. Joerg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.7.0

2009-04-15 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 06:29:33PM -0700, Carl Worth wrote: Compared to the 2.6 series, 2.7.0 has a large number of bug fixes, (see the list below), but also a few significant features, such as: (a) The new check in i830_lvds.c line 1425 disables my internal display. (b) Xv doesn't crash the

Re: Documentation?

2009-04-07 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 02:32:38PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: This is not something specific to core fonts. Fontconfig-using apps do not crash for lack of fonts, because fontconfig has built-in font substitution Are you *really* sure about that? I haven't tried Firefox 3, but older

Re: [PATCH] Fix cast int-to-pointer and pointer-to-int

2009-02-05 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 06:25:40PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: On 02/04/2009 09:04 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:43:43PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: By first casting to long and then to the final type. Of course this assumes that sizeof(long) == sizeof(void

Re: [PATCH] Fix cast int-to-pointer and pointer-to-int

2009-02-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:43:43PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: By first casting to long and then to the final type. Of course this assumes that sizeof(long) == sizeof(void *). If the Win32 folks care enough about warnings, we could make macros for this. Please use either uintptr_t (prefered)

Re: [PATCH] Fix cast int-to-pointer and pointer-to-int

2009-02-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 02:10:36PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:04:05PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 08:43:43PM +0100, Tomas Carnecky wrote: By first casting to long and then to the final type. Of course this assumes that sizeof(long

Re: [PATCH] Include sdk header dependencies and protect agains't multiple inclusion.

2008-12-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:23:09PM -0200, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade wrote: The patch as a whole may not be required to apply, and not that patch verbatim, as it would require still at least a review to ensure every sdk

Re: dolt?

2008-11-06 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:03:56AM -0500, James Cloos wrote: Should we dolitfy the rest of the libraries? If you do, please also fix all applications to consistently use libtool for linking. Many currently don't and fail on platforms without transitive linker like AIX. Joerg

Re: LBX? or faster remote X?

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 01:31:50PM -0500, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: Any alternatives? NBX Maybe you mean NX? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NX_technology Sorry, yes. Joerg ___ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org