Eric Anholt wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch is the result of as few extra
inclusions as possible, by creating a dummy file
including just that header, and making it compile.
This was done in the loader directory, and I added
some extra -I for module headers, but including in
the build
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:23:09PM -0200, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
The patch as a whole may not be required to apply, and not
that patch verbatim, as it would require still at least a
review to ensure every sdk header passes the:
ifdef HAVE_FOO_CONFIG_H
#include foo-config.h
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 06:23:09PM -0200, Paulo C?sar Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
The patch as a whole may not be required to apply, and not
that patch verbatim, as it would require still at least a
review to ensure every sdk
cfb29abf144380a45eefd03fa5a80fa5c19cfe84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Cesar Pereira de Andrade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 04:02:44 -0200
Subject: [PATCH] Include sdk header dependencies and protect agains't multiple inclusion.
---
Xext/geext.h|3 +++
Xext/panoramiX.h
