On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:37:39PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
Torsten Kaiser just.for.l...@googlemail.com writes:
With this optimization level gcc notices, that the loop in function
DDCModesFromEstIII() would go
Torsten Kaiser just.for.l...@googlemail.com writes:
My guess would be, that these bits where reserved in the spec and
should never been set.
These bits come from external sources, and often buggy ones at that. We
should probably just compute the index and skip it if it's out of
range. Sending
Hi Keith,
This bunch of patches has all r-bs in place so I may as well get rid of it!!
This adds the udev probing and all the gpu screen bits up to before
the randr protocol.
I'll probably send another pull-req for stage 2, up to the output
slave stuff, then stage 3
up to the offload slave
This depends on the previous pull req and contains all the patches in
it. The pull
below is from the top of that tree.
This is all the randr changes + output slave additions.
The following changes since commit 74b786f7cee5723468bba251a2155a65770b2ad4:
xfree86: add autoAddGPU option (v2)
This builds on the two previous pull requests. Not fully reviewed, but
its had a few users, and ickle has looked over it a couple of times
and bitched at me ;-)
This relies on an unpushed dri2proto change, since krh is no longer in
X land, and jbarnes is playing video games, I'm going to push it
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-24 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 7 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump
this further later without fear.
(original commit message has wrong numbers, thanks to MrCooper).
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump
this further later without fear.
v2: I suck at maths, that is all. Fixed up the maths to match reality.
Signed-off-by: Dave
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump
this further later without fear.
v2: I suck at maths, that is all. Fixed up the maths to match reality.
v2.1: fix typo
On Fre, 2012-07-06 at 11:27 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump
this further later without fear.
v2: I suck at maths, that is
On Don, 2012-07-05 at 17:51 -0700, Connor Behan wrote:
For real this time. This allows the r128 driver to continue having 2D
That this patch is for the r128 driver should be mentioned on the
subject line (even if it was submitted to the xorg-driver-ati list :),
e.g. as '[PATCH xf86-video-r128]
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for now, and we can bump
this further later without fear.
v2: I suck at maths,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload device ids, this means we can
have 6 offload devices, which is plenty for
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Fre, 2012-06-29 at 19:09 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2012-06-29 at 12:58 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net wrote:
On Fre, 2012-06-29 at 12:20
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
So we reserve bits 16-19 for offload
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/5/12 7:37 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
Torsten Kaiserjust.for.l...@googlemail.com writes:
With this optimization level gcc notices, that the loop in function
DDCModesFromEstIII() would go until i=5 and j=1 which would result in
m = (5 * 8) + (7 - 1) = 46, but the array EstIIIModes[] only
On 07/05/2012 05:52 PM, Bartosz Brachaczek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Brachaczekb.brachac...@gmail.com
Which is weird because the piglit test for this case passed.
Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
---
Hi,
I looked at Ian's patch out of curiosity and spotted this typo.
On 07/05/2012 05:50 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:09:13PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 07/03/2012 10:42 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:33:50AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 07/02/2012 11:44 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Peter
On 07/05/2012 04:41 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:19:33PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 07/03/2012 11:03 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 11:40:25AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 07/02/2012 11:44 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
evemu doesn't export this
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com writes:
I've added my r-b to the patches on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/45623
Merged.
9e4b8b7..7c9d8cb master - master
(for future reference, applying patches from bugzilla is a huge pain.
Please use git send-email to send patches to the list if at all
On 07/06/2012 09:01 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 07/05/2012 05:52 PM, Bartosz Brachaczek wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Brachaczekb.brachac...@gmail.com
Which is weird because the piglit test for this case passed.
The test failed to catch this error because it creates a context with
the
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
Dave Airlie (9):
xf86: cursor code got mangled by indenting
xfree86: use udev to provide device enumeration for kms devices (v10)
screen: split out screen init code. (v2)
dix: introduce gpu screens. (v5)
xf86: cleanup
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
I'm just going to do review here, reading from the git tree diffs.
randr: add provider object and provider property support (v6)
Given that the _rrProvider structs are per-screen, any devPrivate stuff
could live in the screen private instead;
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
dix/xf86: initial offload slave tracking (v1.1)
randr: add hooks for offload sink provider protocol
So familiar by now.
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
xf86: store scanout pixmap in the xf86 struct as well.
xf86:
On 7/6/12 6:11 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
This depends on the previous pull req and contains all the patches in
it. The pull
below is from the top of that tree.
This is all the randr changes + output slave additions.
Looks good. For the series:
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com
- ajax
some comments inline, I've removed anything I agree with and have
fixed up patches
(Hrm, would also be nice if this patch created provider objects for the
screens so that we could test the protocol support here)
the ddx has to create them at CreateScreenResources time, just like
crtc/outputs,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
dix/xf86: initial offload slave tracking (v1.1)
randr: add hooks for offload sink provider protocol
So familiar by now.
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
Okay with lots of r-b's and lots of fixes for comments,
Dave.
The following changes since commit 4d24192bd24fb20d16d0054d77bffda883faeb79:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'airlied/for-keithp-stage1' (2012-07-06
12:17:17 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
based on the v2 output slaves,
I may have smashed an ajax r-b on one patch a bit early, but he might
have r-b more of them, I've explained hopefully the patches you
haven't r-b so feel free to smash it on, as I'm going to bed now.
Dave.
The following changes since commit
On 7/6/12 6:16 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
This builds on the two previous pull requests. Not fully reviewed, but
its had a few users, and ickle has looked over it a couple of times
and bitched at me ;-)
This relies on an unpushed dri2proto change, since krh is no longer in
X land, and jbarnes is
On 07/03/2012 05:30 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
When a touch begin is pointer emulated, do not include touch state when
calculating the button state for the initial motion and button press
events. This ensures the logical state of the buttons prior to the
events is set properly.
This doesn't
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Really if next server I'd really like to shove the scanout pixmap into
the crtc set calls and break the ABI properly, for per-crtc pixmaps it
would make life a bit easier I expect.
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
the ddx has to create them at CreateScreenResources time, just like
crtc/outputs, the startup ordering demands it :)
oh, so you'd have to wrap CreateScreenResources... Yeah, not worth the
pain for an intermediate state like this.
PixmapSyncDirtyHelper
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
dix/randr: add a hook into screen to replace scanout pixmap
Yeah, this looks fine if a bit kludgy.
Reviewed-by: Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com
dri2: add initial prime support. (v1.2)
Still not happy with the 'prime_id' generation. Allocate
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote:
Really if next server I'd really like to shove the scanout pixmap into
the crtc set calls and break the ABI
35 matches
Mail list logo
