Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not

2010-11-08 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
Le 08/11/2010 04:51, Peter Hutterer a écrit : fwiw, I'm not sure arbitrate is the right word here, filtering seems easier to understand in this context. I guess arbitrate would apply more if we emit the events across multiple devices like in the bamboo case. that's mostly bikeshedding though, my

Re: The future of Xephyr and Kdriver

2010-11-08 Thread Feng, Haitao
Hi Jamey, Thank you very much for your reply! Have you noticed Kristian's Wayland project? In an email discussion, Kristian mentioned the Xorg on Xorg idea and discussed its design and implementation. Quoted from the email: I imagine a new module called 'hosted' that lets the DDX drivers

Re: [PATCH] try the newport driver on mips

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 08:30:37 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: Actually, I don't think this is a good idea. Unless I'm mistaken, the newport driver only supports one particular range of SGI graphics hardware. There are quite a few other SGI graphics boards out there and other non-SGI mips

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Xi: split hierarchy manipulation into static functions.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:06:31 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: [...] +static int +remove_master(ClientPtr client, xXIRemoveMasterInfo *r, + int flags[MAXDEVICES]) +{ +DeviceIntPtr ptr, keybd, XTestptr, XTestkeybd; +int rc = Success; + +if (r-return_mode !=

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Xi: rename two variables from ptr to dev.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:06:32 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: They were named ptr when everything was in one function to save one more variable. Now that the stuff is split out, dev makes more sense. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Xi/xichangehierarchy.c | 28

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Xi: if XTEST device creation fails, fail the master devices.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:06:33 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: When getting close to the MAXDEVICES limit, the creation of XTEST devices may fail due to device id exhaustion. In that case, fail the creation of master devices too and return an error to the client. Theoretically, we could

[PATCH] Stop mentioning server's -scanpci option.

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
It got removed in server's 9727db88d57089be6483104de435626cdbad883a (long time ago). Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- man/fbdev.man |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/fbdev.man b/man/fbdev.man index 9c3d24a..bda0ed6 100644 ---

[PATCH] Avoid unused variables when XSERVER_LIBPCIACCESS is defined.

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- src/fbdev.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/fbdev.c b/src/fbdev.c index 4cde790..99672d3 100644 --- a/src/fbdev.c +++ b/src/fbdev.c @@ -284,7 +284,9 @@ FBDevProbe(DriverPtr drv, int flags)

Re: [PATCH] Allow building without XV.

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (07/11/2010): This should probably just add #ifdef XV around that block in src/fbdev.c, so it follows the configuration of the server you're building against (xorg-server.h). In which case, one would have to ship two flavours of the header: one for the normal

Re: [PATCH] Allow building without XV.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 13:41:35 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (07/11/2010): This should probably just add #ifdef XV around that block in src/fbdev.c, so it follows the configuration of the server you're building against (xorg-server.h). In which case,

Re: [PATCH] Stop mentioning server's -scanpci option.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 13:36:21 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: It got removed in server's 9727db88d57089be6483104de435626cdbad883a (long time ago). Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- man/fbdev.man |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Maybe add a

Re: [PATCH] Avoid unused variables when XSERVER_LIBPCIACCESS is defined.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 13:36:47 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- src/fbdev.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital

[PATCH] Perform XV initialization only if the server supports it.

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Use XV from server's xorg-server.h to determine whether to perform XV initialization. Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- src/fbdev.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/fbdev.c b/src/fbdev.c index 99672d3..7e12b1d 100644 --- a/src/fbdev.c

Re: [PATCH] Allow building without XV.

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (08/11/2010): We can just patch that #if XV to #if 0 locally, no need to clutter upstream with such an option. ACK, patch updated. Thanks for the review(s). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] Perform XV initialization only if the server supports it.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 14:24:46 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Use XV from server's xorg-server.h to determine whether to perform XV initialization. Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- src/fbdev.c |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] Stop mentioning server's -scanpci option.

2010-11-08 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Cyril Brulebois wrote: It got removed in server's 9727db88d57089be6483104de435626cdbad883a (long time ago). Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- man/fbdev.man |4 +--- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/man/fbdev.man b/man/fbdev.man index

Re: [PATCH] try the newport driver on mips

2010-11-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Nov  8, 2010 at 08:30:37 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: Actually, I don't think this is a good idea.  Unless I'm mistaken, the newport driver only supports one particular range of SGI graphics hardware.  There are

Dri2 buffer format

2010-11-08 Thread Russell Shaw
Hi, How should the format of a DRI2 buffer be determined? http://www.x.org/releases/current/doc/dri2proto/dri2proto.txt DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT { attachment: CARD32 format: CARD32 } The DRI2ATTACH_FORMAT describes an attachment and the associated format.

Re: The future of Xephyr and Kdriver

2010-11-08 Thread Jamey Sharp
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Feng, Haitao haitao.f...@intel.com wrote: Have you noticed Kristian's Wayland project? In an email discussion, Kristian mentioned the Xorg on Xorg idea and discussed its design and implementation. Quoted from the email: I imagine a new module called 'hosted'

[PATCH xmessage] man: point to the X manpage for more command line options

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
It was already listed in 'SEE ALSO', but adding a reference in the 'OPTIONS' section is probably easier to find. Reported-by: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net Cc: 505...@bugs.debian.org Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org --- xmessage.man |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3

Re: [PATCH] Fix for bug Bug 13040 'Make the cursor option in xorg.conf useful'

2010-11-08 Thread Manuel Reimer
Hello, at first: Forget the last patch ;-) I completely disassembled the pen for this tablet, assembled it again (I placed the small magnet in the pen in in reverse direction, but I'm unsure if this is the reason why it works) and now pen and puck are working again, the way they should...

Re: The future of Xephyr and Kdriver

2010-11-08 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Jamey Sharp ja...@minilop.net wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Feng, Haitao haitao.f...@intel.com wrote: Have you noticed Kristian's Wayland project? In an email discussion, Kristian mentioned the Xorg on Xorg idea and discussed its design and

[PATCH hyperpen] Fixed indentation, dropped trailing whitespaces

2010-11-08 Thread Manuel Reimer
This patch shouldn't change the way the hyperpen driver works. Anything, it does, is to fix the indentation and it drops some useless trailing whitespaces. Without this, the code is nearly unreadable. I used this as reference: http://www.x.org/wiki/CodingStyle Signed-off-by: Manuel Reimer

[PATCH sgml-doctools] Upgrade xorg-sgml-doctools to Autoconf 2.60 directory architecture

2010-11-08 Thread Gaetan Nadon
Currently the value of sgmlrootdir is hard coded relative to $prefix. In Autoconf 2.60, $datarootdir has been added to define the architecture independent data directory. --datarootdir=DIR read-only arch.-independent data root [PREFIX/share] Relative to that location, a number of

Re: [PATCH] Extract LogFinishInit from LogInit

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net (25/10/2010): diff --git a/os/log.c b/os/log.c […] +void +LogFinishInit(void) +{ +if (saveBuffer) { + free(saveBuffer); /* Must be free(), not free() */ That probably can

Re: [PATCH x11perf] Install x11perfcomp auxiliary scripts in $datadir, not $libdir.

2010-11-08 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:40:20 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net --- Makefile.am |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) They're shell scripts, so this looks like a good change.

Re: [PATCH] Extract LogFinishInit from LogInit

2010-11-08 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 20:53:40 08.11.2010 UTC+01 when k...@debian.org did gyre and gimble: diff --git a/os/log.c b/os/log.c […] +void +LogFinishInit(void) +{ +if (saveBuffer) { +free(saveBuffer);/* Must be free(), not free() */ CB

1.9.3rc1 Firday

2010-11-08 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
I'd like to round up changes for a 1.9.3rc1 this Friday. I know there are some good input fixes (one of which was delayed from 1.9.2 due to a regression that should now be fixed), and there are probably others. If you think you've got a fix that should land in 1.9.3, please nominate it this

Re: displayid: dubious assignments

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 21:03 +0200, Nicolas Kaiser wrote: Hi there! I noticed two assignments that look a bit peculiar to me. n is assigned MAX_HSYNC and MAX_VREFRESH, but these values get either overwritten or remain unused. I hope that's not a problem? Well, it's not a problem at the

Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Benjamin Tissoires tisso...@cena.fr wrote: Le 08/11/2010 04:51, Peter Hutterer a écrit : fwiw, I'm not sure arbitrate is the right word here, filtering seems easier to understand in this context. I guess arbitrate would apply more if we emit the events across

Re: Smooth scrolling again

2010-11-08 Thread Max Schwarz
Hi Simon, That sounds fine. But how are button events being generated which match a potential only-smooth-scrolling input? I'm not sure I understand your question. I didn't change the generation of button events in any way. They are just emitted in parallel by the old code. You want that

Re: Smooth scrolling again

2010-11-08 Thread Simon Thum
On 11/07/10 18:03, Max Schwarz wrote: Hi Simon, A thing I'm missing is how you're establishing the relationship of smooth and button scrolling? It might just be me since I'm only looking at the diffs. It's certainly subtle ;-) Look at EvdevProcessRelativeMotionEvent(). In case of a change

Re: [PATCH xmessage] man: point to the X manpage for more command line options

2010-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 05:20:29PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: It was already listed in 'SEE ALSO', but adding a reference in the 'OPTIONS' section is probably easier to find. Reported-by: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer i...@selidor.net Cc: 505...@bugs.debian.org Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau

Re: [PATCH x11proto] Add XF86XK_TouchpadOn/Off

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Patch is fine with me. any NAKs? The udev patch to standardise the behaviour is already in, see http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commit;h=a1ca5f60e0770299c5c5f21bd371f5823802412b It requires an

[PATCH 2/2] Remove more superfluous if(p!=NULL) checks around free(p).

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
This patch has been generated by the following Coccinelle semantic patch: @@ expression E; @@ - if (E != NULL) - free(E); + free(E); Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- dix/grabs.c |7 ++- glx/single2.c |3 +--

[PATCH 1/2] Remove more superfluous if(p) checks around free(p).

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
This patch has been generated by the following Coccinelle semantic patch: @@ expression E; @@ - if (E) - free(E); + free(E); Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org --- hw/dmx/glxProxy/glxcmds.c |2 +- hw/dmx/glxProxy/glxext.c | 18 +- 2 files changed, 10

Re: [PATCH] Extract LogFinishInit from LogInit

2010-11-08 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Mikhail Gusarov dotted...@dottedmag.net (08/11/2010): +if (saveBuffer) { +free(saveBuffer);/* Must be free(), not free() */ CB CB That probably can go away, see 3f3ff971. Right, as well as if

Re: [PATCH xserver 1/9] Create/Destroy/Trigger/Reset Fence Sync objects

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:32 -0700, James Jones wrote: +static int +FreeFence(void *obj, XID id) +{ +SyncFence *pFence = (SyncFence *) obj; + +free(pFence); + +return Success; +} Seems wordy, but sure. - ajax ___

Re: [PATCH xserver 3/9] Create SyncObject base type.

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:32 -0700, James Jones wrote: diff --git a/Xext/syncsrv.h b/Xext/syncsrv.h index a805f28..cc104ff 100644 --- a/Xext/syncsrv.h +++ b/Xext/syncsrv.h @@ -53,15 +53,30 @@ PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. #define CARD64 XSyncValue /* XXX temporary! need real 64 bit

Re: [PATCH xserver 7/9] Add XDamageSubtractAndTrigger operation

2010-11-08 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 16:32 -0700, James Jones wrote: COPYING |2 +- Xext/sync.c | 27 +++--- Xext/syncsrv.h | 68 ++ configure.ac| 21 ++- damageext/damageext.c

Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not

2010-11-08 Thread Ping Cheng
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Chris Bagwell ch...@cnpbagwell.com wrote: I think we may be mixing some topics and so I'd like to try to re-frame the discussion. There are two different cases and they may have different answers because of it. I'd like to cover both cases with an unified

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Remove more superfluous if(p) checks around free(p).

2010-11-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: This patch has been generated by the following Coccinelle semantic patch: @@ expression E; @@ - if (E) -   free(E); + free(E); Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org ---  hw/dmx/glxProxy/glxcmds.c |    2 +-

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove more superfluous if(p!=NULL) checks around free(p).

2010-11-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: This patch has been generated by the following Coccinelle semantic patch: @@ expression E; @@ - if (E != NULL) -   free(E); + free(E); Signed-off-by: Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org ---  dix/grabs.c                  

Re: [PATCH xorg-docs 3/3] Add Makefile XML profiling support

2010-11-08 Thread Gaetan Nadon
On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 20:27 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: When I tried building with this series, plus [PATCH sgml-doctools] Set stylesheet to provide XML profiling support I got: runtime error: file /usr/X11R7/share/sgml/X11/xorg.xsl line 254 element call-template The called template

Re: [PATCH sgml-doctools] Upgrade xorg-sgml-doctools to Autoconf 2.60 directory architecture

2010-11-08 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Gaetan Nadon wrote: Currently the value of sgmlrootdir is hard coded relative to $prefix. In Autoconf 2.60, $datarootdir has been added to define the architecture independent data directory. --datarootdir=DIR read-only arch.-independent data root [PREFIX/share] Relative to that

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 5/9] Generalize comment above Sync CheckTriggered funcs

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
The comment referred only to counter sync objects and did not include the new fence sync CheckTriggered function. Generalize the language so it applies to all the CheckTriggered functions. Signed-off-by: James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by:

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 3/9] Create SyncObject base type.

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
SyncObject is now the base type for SyncCounter and SyncFence. Data to be used by both types is stored in the base object. Both SyncCounter and SyncFence can be safely cast to SyncObject, and a SyncObject can be cast to the correct type based on SyncObject::type. Signed-off-by: James Jones

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 2/9] Add XSyncQueryFence()

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
Allows callers to query whether or not a given fence sync object is currently triggered. Signed-off-by: James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner aplatt...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Robert Morell rmor...@nvidia.com --- Xext/sync.c | 49

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 8/9] Add fence sync driver interface

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
-Add devPrivates to fence sync objects. -Add a X sync module screen private -Add wrappable functions to create and destroy fence sync objects -Give fence sync objects wrappable functions to trigger, test, and reset their 'triggered' value. -Give fence sync objects wrappable functions to

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 6/9] Add XSyncAwaitFence() handler

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
-Add the actual ProcSyncAwaitFence() dispatch func -Factor out some more common code from ProcSyncAwait() into SyncAwaitPrologue() and SyncAwaitEpilogue(). Call these from both Await functions. -Check and handle triggers when triggering or freeing a fence sync object. -Fix a few bugs in the

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 4/9] Make Await SyncTrigger functions generic

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
Update all the functions dealing with Await sync triggers handle generic sync objects instead of just counters. This will facilitate code sharing between the counter sync waits and the fence sync waits. Signed-off-by: James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com Reviewed-by: Aaron Plattner

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 9/9] Export SyncVerifyFence() in new SDK header

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
Add syncsdk.h, a new xorg SDK header. It contains SyncVerifyFence() and the helper functions that use it to look up fence sync objects. Exporting this functionality in an SDK header allows 3rd party extensions to look up fence objects in their interop APIs. Signed-off-by: James Jones

[PATCH xserver (rev2) 7/9] Add XDamageSubtractAndTrigger operation

2010-11-08 Thread James Jones
XDamageSubtractAndTrigger behaves exactly like XDamageSubtract except it receives an optional fence sync object. If the value of this object is not None, it is triggered by X once all the rendering associated with the damage regions being subtracted has completed. Signed-off-by: James Jones

Re: [PATCH x11proto] Add XF86XK_TouchpadOn/Off

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:32 -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Patch is fine with me. any NAKs? The udev patch to standardise the behaviour is

Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not

2010-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:54:51PM -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Benjamin Tissoires tisso...@cena.fr wrote: Le 08/11/2010 04:51, Peter Hutterer a écrit : fwiw, I'm not sure arbitrate is the right word here, filtering seems easier to understand in this

Re: [PATCH x11proto] Add XF86XK_TouchpadOn/Off

2010-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:17:23PM -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:32 -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Patch is fine

Re: [RFC] Multi-Touch (MT) support - arbitration or not

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:54:51PM -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: I think we may be mixing some topics and so I'd like to try to re-frame the discussion. There are two different cases and they may have different

Re: [PATCH x11proto] Add XF86XK_TouchpadOn/Off

2010-11-08 Thread Chris Bagwell
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 21:17 -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 16:32 -0600, Chris Bagwell wrote: On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:24 PM,

Re: Smooth scrolling again

2010-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 02:56:22PM +0100, Max Schwarz wrote: I finally found some time for smooth scrolling. I've got rebased patches against git versions for xserver, xf86-input-evdev, xf86-input-synaptics in my github repo at https://github.com/x-quadraht/pscroll. Would you mind checking

[PATCH] xfree86: remove user-configured AllowEmptyInput

2010-11-08 Thread Peter Hutterer
An estimated 100% (rounded down to the nearest percent) of those who have this in their configuration don't actually know what this option does. Protect the users from themselves. IIRC, AEI on was useful for some time between 1.4 and 1.5 and never since. Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer

Re: [PATCH_v2] use CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE posix timer instead of CLOCK_MONOTONIC in Xorg

2010-11-08 Thread ykzhao
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 18:51 +0800, Daniel Stone wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 05:32:55PM +0800, ykzhao wrote: On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 10:15 +0800, Daniel Stone wrote: On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:20:59AM +0800, yakui.z...@intel.com wrote: Limit the CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE posix timer to

Re: [PATCH xserver (rev2) 1/9] Create/Destroy/Trigger/Reset Fence Syncobjects

2010-11-08 Thread canbaby
On 11/09/2010 10:07 AM, James Jones wrote: } @@ -2073,6 +2244,7 @@ SyncExtensionInit(void) } RTAlarm = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAlarm, SyncAlarm); RTAwait = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAwait, SyncAwait); +RTFence = CreateNewResourceType(FreeFence, SyncFence); if

Re: [PATCH xserver (rev2) 1/9] Create/Destroy/Trigger/Reset Fence Syncobjects

2010-11-08 Thread canbaby
On 11/09/2010 10:07 AM, James Jones wrote: @@ -2073,6 +2244,7 @@ SyncExtensionInit(void) } RTAlarm = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAlarm, SyncAlarm); RTAwait = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAwait, SyncAwait); +RTFence = CreateNewResourceType(FreeFence, SyncFence); if

Re: [PATCH xserver (rev2) 1/9] Create/Destroy/Trigger/Reset Fence Syncobjects

2010-11-08 Thread Alan Coopersmith
canbaby wrote: On 11/09/2010 10:07 AM, James Jones wrote: } @@ -2073,6 +2244,7 @@ SyncExtensionInit(void) } RTAlarm = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAlarm, SyncAlarm); RTAwait = CreateNewResourceType(FreeAwait, SyncAwait); +RTFence = CreateNewResourceType(FreeFence,