Kenneth Crudup wrote:
...
It could also be that your video card has an interrupt line that is
assigned (check in BIOS).
It's a laptop- I can't check it in the BIOS, but /proc/pci and
/proc/interrupts say no.
The BIOS doesn't contain this setting? (I've yet to meet a laptop
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Kevin Brosius wrote:
It could also be that your video card has an interrupt line that is
assigned (check in BIOS).
The BIOS doesn't contain this setting? (I've yet to meet a laptop
without a BIOS setup.)
I *have* a BIOS setup. I don't have any settings for much,
On Saturday 05 January 2002 18:26, you wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, John Tapsell wrote:
but could you try with the latest 2.4 kernel? just to check - thanks.
Tried *that*, too: 2.2.19, 2.4.4, 2.4.17 . No difference. If I'd had the
right binutils, I'd've checked against 2.5.1, but I'm sure it
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:33:16PM -0800, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Yuri van Oers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
Looking thru a couple of months of list archives turned up nothing, so:
When running 4.1.0 on my laptop
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002, Kevin Brosius wrote:
This is the first time I've heard anything like this recently. How do
you notice the clock shift?
After the machine's been running for a few minutes, and before I start X,
date ; rdate time.nist.gov shows at most a second's difference. 30 mins
after X
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
Looking thru a couple of months of list archives turned up nothing, so:
When running 4.1.0 on my laptop using a S3Virge MX, my system clock loses
at least two seconds per minute.
I've done everything I can to narrow this down, and the bottom
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Yuri van Oers wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Kenneth Crudup wrote:
Looking thru a couple of months of list archives turned up nothing, so:
When running 4.1.0 on my laptop using a S3Virge MX, my system clock loses
at least two seconds per minute.
I've done everything
