On 2021-02-05 Brett Okken wrote:
> I worked this out last night. We need to double how much we copy each
> time by not advancing "back". This actually works even better than
> Arrays.fill for the single byte case also.
This clearly is a good idea in a Java implementation. :-)
I still worry about
On 2021-02-06 Brett Okken wrote:
> Since it is quite easy to read an int from a byte[] in jdk 9, the
> CRC64 implementation can be optimized to operate on an int rather than
> byte by byte as part of a multi-release jar. This shows to be 5-7%
> faster in a microbenchmark of just the crc64
