When viewing items you have tagged for someone else (for:x), the
related tags listing gives you an option to view for:x from all
users -- which, of course, you cannot access... unless you are x
(though I'm not sure how you could get to that screen if you were x,
unless you browse to
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 04:52:59PM +0100, Björn Lindström wrote:
I agree. Actually, I tend to think that the for:-tags shouldn't really
be implemented as tags. That is, you should somehow be able to send a
bookmark to another user's for-page, but you shouldn't have to introduce
another tag
On 11/3/05, Prentiss Riddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This highlights a practical dimension to this: Whereas a tag is a tag,
plain and simple, for:x requires knowledge of a(n albeit simple, but
nonetheless) higher order syntax.
This syntax is, presumably, no more complex than the bracket you
Apologies, Matthew Weymar wrote the quote below, not Prentiss Riddle.
Tom.
On 11/3/05, Prentiss Riddle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This highlights a practical dimension to this: Whereas a tag is a tag,
plain and simple, for:x requires knowledge of a(n albeit simple, but
nonetheless) higher
Is there a plan to offer search feeds?
Also since Tag:searching returns items where ever the characters appear, and not the exact phrase...kind of like CTRL-F, is there a way to see a list of tags before the results screen. ie sort your results by tag.
I guess an exact phrase search would also
Sorry I forgot to refer you guys to a post I just did about this, it may clarify what I mean:
http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2005/11/04/delicious-inbox-spliced-feeds-and-wheres-the-search-feeds/
-- John Tropeahttp://libraryclips.blogsome.com
___
I have started playing with the delicious RESTAPI (making a .Net wrapper to use for several potential projects) and I was wondering if there's a way to query another user's posts/tags? Currently it looks as if whoever is authenticated is the only user that results can bereturned for, and the
7 matches
Mail list logo
