Good grief, this is great!
I read the list every day, and somehow missed this response. I didn't
find it until I was poking around the blog.
Anyway.
These groupings are great; now give me some more good news.
Can I search only my tags? I see that the site changes
/search?all=tag:x to
On Jun 17, 2006, at 16:42, schulzjf wrote:
Boolean doesn't seem too hard. How about
+ AND (status quo)
- NOT
| OR
You can already do this with some little-known search features:
http://del.icio.us/search/?all=tag%3Astatus+tag%3Aquo
http://del.icio.us/search/?all=tag%3Aweb+-tag%3Aajax
On 6/19/06, Joshua Schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, a very small slice of user traffic makes use of
intersections. I suspect that more complicated queries would be even
less used.
I don't know that this kind of extrapolation is particularly valid or
relevant. Of course most of
On 6/20/06, Chris Lott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/19/06, Joshua Schachter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, a very small slice of user traffic makes use of
intersections. I suspect that more complicated queries would be even
less used.
I don't know that this kind of extrapolation
On 6/20/06, Hamish MacEwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems reasonable to extrapolate from the low utilisation simpler
complexities, that greater complexity would be even less used.
Fair enough, except that what is complex is in part determined by
the use. I simply think that positing the use
I'd like to get this discussion going again.
Actually, I'd like to reopen both the Boolean and regex discussions.
Boolean doesn't seem too hard. How about
+AND (status quo)
-NOT
|OR
I'd love to see grouping ex: (blog|blogs|blogging)-search but that
example brings us back to
to evolve our architecture.
Joshua
_
From: ydn-delicious@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of schulzjf
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 1:42 PM
To: ydn-delicious@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [ydn-delicious] Re: Boolean
7 matches
Mail list logo
