I have to say your use of Yojimbo as
an everyday GTD tool is pretty impressive.
Just the ambition to try and use it that
way is impressive. I don’t really see that
as the purpose of Yojimbo. (It’s really
just considered an archival application.)
The purpose of Yojimbo doesn't encompass
What would happen if the tag collection
had several tags associated with it?
Would you assign all of the available
tags to an item dragged to that
collection?
Absolutely. Why else would I be dragging it to that collection, if not
because I wanted it to appear in that collection?
--
Sounds like you need OmniFocus.
I find it works perfectly with YJ - any detailed notes, saved
documents I have relating to a task in YJ can be linked to from OF by
pasting the item link as a note for the task making the two work
pretty seamlessly together.
T.
On 6 May 2008, at 13:26,
You’re definitely not alone in your
hesitance to use tags. David said
this weekend that humans are spatial
thinkers. Which is why stuffing things
into an established hierarchy makes
more sense than tags. While it’s true
that - some - people are spatial
thinkers, there are also people who
On 5/6/08 at 5:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(The reason David Allen recommends a simple A-to-Z filing system as
part of the GTD method, it seems to me, is less about ease of
retrieval and more about ease of filing.
For me, this is where Yojimbo excels. With the current model, I
don't need
