Florian Festi wrote:
Hi!
More testing fun:
The .whatProvides() method is provided by the RpmSack only. In fact
that method should be used anymore anyway. And - ta ta - I still had
some patches fixing that issue. It also moves the cheaterlookup to
contain package objects insted of pkgtups.
seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 12:07 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Florian Festi wrote:
Hi!
More testing fun:
The .whatProvides() method is provided by the RpmSack only. In fact
that method should be used anymore anyway. And - ta ta - I still had
some patches fixing that
I you want then i will reverse the patch ?
I = if :)
Tim
___
Yum-devel mailing list
Yum-devel@linux.duke.edu
https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:50 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
I you want then i will reverse the patch ?
I = if :)
Still debating this. On the one hand I think someone using cheaterlookup
on their own is pretty unlikely. OTOH who knows what sort of bizarre
crap someone might be doing. What does
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:58 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 16:50 +0200, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
I you want then i will reverse the patch ?
I = if :)
Still debating this. On the one hand I think someone using cheaterlookup
on their own is pretty unlikely. OTOH who knows
